I (struggle to) use arch (in disposable VMs, not my actual machine) btw

top 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

If you ever want to sweat and earn some knowledge that manual install process is a way to use up two weekends doing just that if it's your first time.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Dammit, that makes me want to steal a laptop just to fuck with arch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago

    ... The whole source of the meme is that I'm just dumping arch into VMs. Download an easy to use VM manager like gnome boxes or virt-manager and use the snapshot functionality to come back to it later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    You don't have to be 1337 to install arch, but you do need to be pretty 1337 to keep it running. I use arch btw, but I also use Mint because I don't always have time for Arch's shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    "Hey, I tried the recommended GUI package manager and everything got messed up. Is anyone looking into this?"
    "lol just use pacman -Syu in terminal"
    "...k, guess I will, but I'm not about to recommend this to anyone else"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Who the hell not manually partitions their system? You guys have empty hard drives?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well if you're moving from Windows, you can just nuke the entire thing with automatic partitioning and it feels so damn good

    But since that was a long time ago, these days I keep my / and /home on not just separate partitions but separate drives since all my SSDs are only 1 TB. The installer can do whatever the hell it wants to / but /home has to stay untouched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    What junk can you possibly fill multiple TB drives with? I have a mini desktop with a TB drive and it's only got about 7.5 GB on it. And I think that's a lot. My pathetic little home server is a measly 500GB and has just 37GB on it. I even have another computer that I use with 125GB drive. Barely 1/3 filled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Me. Not worth my effort. I've reached a point where I just can't be bothered to be 1337 anymore.

    Everything that matters is backed up to 3 different places, my pathetic little repurposed laptop home server and 2 cloud services. And one of those is literally on the other side of the planet from me.

    I sleep well. As much as the doctor prescribed medications and cpap machine allow for anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I definitely agree here. But if you want to better learn how the system works, I suggest getting a cheap used laptop and just hammer at installing arch using the install guide, not the installer tool. The tool is nice and all, but you still need to know what is going on under the hood and to understand most of it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    I struggle to see the hype of Arch.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It does have its merits, but the hype is pretty much "cool kids go hard"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    If they really wanted to go hard, they'd be running Gentoo or LFS. Possibly Debian or Slack if they were truly hardcore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    True, but Gentoo and LFS are too hard for them, and Debian/Slack too old and uncool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I ain't got the time to wait for Gentoo to finish compiling. I'm old and don't have that many years left to live. And LFS, well madness lies on that path. I have seen it and barely escaped.

    Debian is kind of cool again in a hipster sort of way if you aren't running a bunch of servers. I do wonder why Slack has faded so. It was the Arch of it's day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    my jokey response was already said by Allero, so I'll tell you what I think draws people to it.

    1. Early packages. As soon as the packages are shipped, arch tries to get them in the repo, stability and interoperability be damned
    2. Related to the above, AUR. You can't be bothered to build something? Get it from the AUR from someone who an be bothered to build it, but can't be bothered to be the maintainer of that package. This then leads to the issue recently with malware.
    3. Minimalism. Arch only gives you what you need and you need to set up everything else.
    4. No automated help, thus, total control and responsibility over your system. Installed a flatpak? Set up the executable in the application launcher yourself. (NB : your mileage may vary, I'm comparing LXQT arch with LXQT debian)

    I'm using it in VMs only, and because setting it up is faster for me than setting up debian, which is my daily driver. Like I said many times in this thread, I slop it on using archinstall since it just needs the initial config, and I just walk away. The deb installer uses a wizard that "does stuff" while I go through it, so I have to stop and start. I'm only doing defaults anyway , so I don't have to change much in the installer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, my quip is meant in the same vein. Every person is entitled to their own choice in the road to Hell they want to take.

    In a more serious personal opinion, you can get nearly the same undercooked packages from SUSE Tumbleweed, with just with a bit more seasoning and testing. And if freshness matters with even better seasoning and testing Fedora can fill that role. And both take less effort and have less risk.

    I stopped giggling and laughing about the flaming wreckage of my installs a decade ago because I'm just too old and lazy to fix things anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I think I tried OpenSuse, but I'm not sure how I felt.

    Does it have the easy archinstaller?

    EDIT: They really fucked up the naming convention with Tumbleweed, which makes me think of a deserted place, when it's actually the more up to date one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I've tried Tumbleweed several times and liked it, but the package management and a couple of other things about it just didn't vibe with me. I do like the name of Tumbleweed. Tumbleweeds never stay still as long as the wind blows. The wanderlust is real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

    Not using installer more often than not is a good indicator of being tryhard and not something to brag about (like who cares how exactly have you installed OS, something that you do once in a few years).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I think I get what you're saying, but you might want to fix up the way you said it to be clearer, for your own clarity of expression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    My current copy of arch on my laptop was manually installed by using pacstrap running on my previous nixos installation because i didn't have a usb drive with me. i don't really recommend that route it isnt very well supported

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    It was* (before archinstall) usually bragged about in a tongue and cheek way...I thought. Be pretty stupid to brag you're literate enough to just follow directions. Waste of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I've never bragged that I managed to install Arch (Or Gentoo for that matter), buuut let's be honest, most people aren't literate enough to follow directions. Complex words outside of their domain of expertise frighten and confuse most people.

    But then the people who understand the complexity involved to understand the brag are precisely the people who themselves could easily install follow said instructions so it becomes kinda moot anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • Arch has good documentation. Read it and you'll be ok.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Which version of windows is arch?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Well, what a fest of dumb elitism and delusional farce in the comments. I need more popcorn and that you deeply for posting this

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Tbh gatekeeping Arch by keeping an area of pestilent neckbeards around it is good actually. I mean there's nothing hard or elite about Arch really but newbies should never be exposed to the AUR (see recent events) when they have no clue what they're doing and the risks associated with AUR use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    We could do the same by properly informing newbies about what Arch is and what it expects of a user... but who am I kidding. A negative deterrent is anyway needed, you are right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Better use cachyos, compilation flags will give you a performance boost.

    And for disposable distro use distrobox.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    An illegal site that you should totally never use as there you can find free movies, series, and other stuff to torrent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I was gonna ask why and say something but now i am unsure if it is sarcasm lol. Also I am assuming it is 1337x.to? That's what appeared on a quick search. But is that really what the image reffered to? how is this related to... installing arch? Unless that's also part of the joke if it is a joke. Does it just gather the stuff from other sites so that it is easier to find anyways??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment