all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 71 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Predictable.

They pull this shit all the time with laws. They keep renaming, rewriting, and resubmitting bills. Also, they hide shit in other bills to sneak it by voters.

Power corrupts and one mitigation is term limits at every level. We also need to demand corporate money be removed from politics, and enforcement of existing corruption laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    The protection of privacy is not a sprint, it's a marathon.

    When so many business models rely on invading it (looking at you big tech), the obvious solution is regulation, and preferably establishment of a right to privacy.

    ETA: That said, I highly approve of what's happening to Flock.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    Axon's Fusus is another tech on my radar that has been concerning me for the last few years.

    Essentially it takes Ring cameras and any camera stream really to build the info-dragnet for authorities. You can take down the most visible cameras but that doesn't change the need to address the root of the problem which is how the image data is used and shared without your consent.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    The real problem is the proliferation of cheap camera's and wifi. We've already had those wifi doorbell camera's for almost a decade which they can access if they really want. If we take down Flock they'll find another way to put up cameras that are just like them.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Meet our new product line: Fluck Cameras - Get Modern, Get Flucked!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    They'll fix it in software as soon as it becomes an issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    According to the researcher in the above project, model weights on flocks at least are local and not remotely updateable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Tryhackme has a course that teaches you the basics on how to develop such patterns tailored to the model you want to trick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Yeah it was the branding that was the problem. If this leads to multiple smaller companies replacing them, though, that is, arguably, a marginal improvement. If all of the tracking data is not centralized through one company, then it is more difficult to combine all of that data trackers to get one cohesive record of ones movements over a larger area. But that is really only a temporary fix until they all work together to streamline datasharing.

  • source
  • 58 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 68 points 1 month ago* (20 children)

    San Diego approves smart streetlight cameras

    San Diego police will soon be able to rely on surveillance cameras and license plate readers attached to 500 streetlights citywide, after the City Council approved their use Tuesday.

    Also, we have this style, mounted high up on poles at the major intersections in my town, well out of reach of vandalism.

    Yes, I know these are likely not used for the tracking people, or at least weren't originally installed for that. But, what's to keep them from upgrading or replacing them with ones that look the same to serve the same function as Flock cameras? No one would even notice. Sensor resolution, and optics for small cameras keeps improving.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    But not out of range of a paintball gun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I was personally thinking a pseumatic gun with a solid projectile shot, would probably take a lot of testing to get the right range, accuracy, and power though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Crazy how .50cal airguns aren't federally classified as firearms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well for one there's ideally no fire involved. But also we are talking about something that has limited manufacturing and hasn't been used for anything large scale yet so yeah. Also would you really trust the current federal government to classify a sandwich? Let alone anything more complex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Do you mean one of the many pneumatic airguns you can buy for hunting and the like? The ones that aren't classified as firearms and thus aren't nearly as legally restricted or regulated as firearms despite being able to deliver similar accuracy and kinetic force?

    And yes, the fed hasn't been super great at making logical distinctions between objects in general commerce. They're silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    Paint doesn't typically work on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Why not?

    If paint is ineffective and those bubbles are made from plastic, there is very likely a solvent that would permanently make the plastic hazy by partially dissolving the surface. I think acetone or MEK would do the trick to polycarbonate but you'd want to test at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    You ever seen videos of people trying to spray paint the doorbell cameras? They're coated so the paint just falls off. Same for paintball paint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Every plastic has a solvent that will eat through it. Even glass can be etched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    If anyone's passing through and thought "huh glass etch? neat!", just be aware that glass etchants contain HF, which is one of the nastiest chemicals a normie can buy. It will happily penetrate through your skin. It might penetrate your PPE if you chose unwisely. Does it burn? Nope. It just dissolves your fucking bones. If you buy glass etchant, also buy a tube of calcium gluconate and keep it nearby while using the glass etch. If you spill some etchant on you, rinse the area for a few minutes and then apply the calcium gluconate to attract and neutralize the HF.

    Source: I used to fill and train others to fill 40L tanks of 50% HF for cleaning semiconductor wafers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Surely the pole it's mounted on connects to something..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well, yes. Usually mounted on extensions to a traffic light pole. You're not cutting it down with a hacksaw, at least.

    Imagine this on top of a traffic light:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    To be fair, there's a lot of those that are just traffic light cameras. They look for a car to pull up before they let the lights change. Cut them down and the traffic lights stop working.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The nearby city had a whackadoo mayor whose plan was wifi APs at every Xth streetlight: residents could use the free city wifi while they drove down the highway.

    What didn't happen? Streetlight APs.

    What happened? An amazing shift forward to laying fibre under every construction project and connecting the parts later, to cover a sizeable portion in city-owned fibre infra. They're gonna cover everything and start connecting people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago

    Cop cars have ALPR’s mounted on their trunk lids too. America is hung up on “Flock” instead of the states and federal government surveillance everyone, legally innocent or guilty, for everything.

  • source
  • Within seconds, Axon Outpost, a compact, solar-powered ALPR camera perched quietly on a nearby pole, flags a match: silver SUV, roof rack, visible bumper sticker. It sends the alert to AxonFusus, which instantly cross-references the livestream with a dozen other nearby feeds, pulls the path of travel, and pushes it straight to officers in the field. Within minutes, the child is found safe

    Correction: within minutes, heavily armed trigger happy police murder a black man to discover there is no child, and that the AI powered system made another false-positve

    They call paramedics to collect the dead body, and immediately drive away in a frenzy to attack the next innocent person due to the near constant steam of alerts from this hallucinating system.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago

    If it looks like a flock, acts like a flock... then it's a flock camera. Different names doesn't mean anything. They should all go away.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago

    Fortunately sledgehammers and angle grinders are cross-platform compatible.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They are adamant about being able to watch us at all times. This doesn't end with flock.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    They're testing to see if we're dumb enough to fall for such a switcheroo.

    I suspect most of us are.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I'm going to take this opportunity to ask: what actually reduces crime and improves public safety?

    I feel like I should know the answer to this already (education and universal healthcare) but yet the discussion of crime reduction always revolves around increased police presence and surveillance technology.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    it's not about reducing crime or improving public safety. It's about finding "riff raff," like protests, nevermind the right to peacefully assemble is in the Constitution. But also, these are warrantless searches on our private property. Yeah, annotating our car, model, and its dings; that's private property.

    Effectively, it's an unlawful autonomous police member.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago

    I feel like I should know the answer to this already (education and universal healthcare) but yet the discussion of crime reduction always revolves around increased police presence and surveillance technology.

    They will spend more to fight socialism than it'd cost to actually impliment socialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    And guess which company gets product placement in The Rookie with both name and logo every time there's body cam footage in a scene (which happens every episode, usually several times per)?

    That's right, Axon!

    That and all the copaganda REALLY gets in the way of enjoying the charm of Nathan Fillion 😮‍💨

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    I fully expected that. Flock gets to be the sacrificial lamb for the surveillance camera industry.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

    Every time an article like this comes and you are tempted to reply to the seemingly inevitable creeping surveillance apparatus with "well, it can't stop a paintball/hacksaw/.50 cal/etc. etc." you need to stop.

    Stop for a moment and listen to yourself. Look at the bigger picture. I admire the bravado and pushback but does this really sound like a reasonable solution to a systemic issue? That's like saying "if I think there's cockroaches infesting my house, I'll just step on everyone I see" Like that is going to solve the problem.

    (And honestly, are you really going to get off your lazy ass, go buy a portable angle grinder and go cut down a light pole in the middle of the night? Really? How many beers does that take?)

    So, next time you want to post something like that, instead, just post a link in support to the person, be it a politician or advocate, who is willing to legislate against this encroachment of privacy.

    Oh, you don't know of any?

    Well maybe that's actually getting to the heart of the problem.

    This is true everywhere, but especially in the US, if you are looking right now at current events aghast with a feeling of doom rolling over you- that is the sign.

    It's time to stop being a passive acceptor of circumstances. It's time to act.

    We have to dig political aspirants out of the woodwork and push them onto the stage. There is somebody in your area that is capable of advocating for your rights. You need to find them.

    If you can't find a local group. Start a discord, IRC, hell facebook page, what ever, just start connecting people in your town, in your neighborhood. All it takes is a few minutes a day to start.

    You have to be politically active. Or else your future is going in the meat grinder. Nobody is coming to save you.

    There is no group who has an interest in keeping you, your society, your children, your futures, free from fascist control. Not the DNC, not the State government, not city hall. There is only you and your friends. You have to fight for it yourselves. When the garden is left untended the weeds take over. The weeds have taken over. It's time to return to the garden.

    It can be done. The people hold all the power - Provided They Are Given A Plan of Action To Follow. You need to help craft that plan. Organizing and agitating gets results. Facts.

    Stop posting bullshit on Lemmy and start posting real shit in your local advocacy group.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You do both.

    As you've noted, we've unfortunately entered the era of "hard work" in defense of our own liberty. But as you've also noted, there's few champions. So you can vote conscientiously, support grassroots efforts when you find them, but also maybe clip a camera pole with the work truck while you're going about your day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    That's the way it is but not the way it should or can be.

    The American people have largely abandoned their civic duty and disengaged from the process. We are reaping what we, and our parents, have sown and it's not pretty. Complacency, escapism, consumerism, feelings of disempowerment, having taken their toll.

    Contrast that to a literal workforce that runs 24/7 backed by billions from special interest groups who have been seeking to undermine the republic for decades now. Decades. It's no wonder the system is corrupt and the democratic process fails to serve the people. We've allowed it to happen, but we can also undo the damage.

    It's an uphill battle but the garden belongs to the people. The fruits of our labors belong in our baskets. This miasma can be dispelled the moment people say they've had enough and stand up en masse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    You're not wrong. America is just about as imperialist as they come in the modern sense. The bulk of the 'glorious history' of Americanism is simply being in the right place at the right time in world development and a whole lot of Hollywood. It's been bullshit from the very beginning. The same as any large and expanding country since the beginning of time.

    That said, there are only two options for humans, sit down in defeat, weighed under the crushing conformity of tradition. Or set a new course and brave the inertia and violent established interests.

    You and I are more alike than we are to our respective leaders. Thus, the common man must join forces with all neighbors to climb on the back of our wolves and hold on tightly by the ears. A government unchecked by its people is a dangerous and rampaging beast. It's our responsibility to hold our governments to higher standards. By force if necessary, but it must also come by working through and changing the system wherever possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    halloween is coming, just saying

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    High vis vest, hard hat, mask, telescoping pole and a plastic bag with glue could be used for "maintenance".

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    That's OK I'm sure our reciprocating saws will work in both.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Maybe me think of that guy that was interviewed who was like "we ain't putting them back up immediately. We'll wait a while and everyone will forget and move on, and we'll put them back up then"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    There are officials responsible for approving the installation of these cameras. The only thing that will stop this is to make them fear the consequences of doing so.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Inevitable. The next generation will be imperceptible and thus impossible to vandalize.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    No. This too can be covered in spray paint and be cut down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I appreciate the enthusiasm, but how will you cut this down? This is where they'll be mounted next:

    Also, the only reason there's been any success is because of social awareness. I have no doubt those types of posts are now being stifled. Perhaps you can fly a drone up and paint a lens, but almost no one else will even if you do. That's beyond the skill set of most people.

    Vandalism isn't going to work, it needs to be addressed at the policy level, that means protests, attending city council meetings, and paying attention and voting in local elections. Not nearly so fun to post videos of this for likes on social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I appreciate the name of the new company being included right in the headline. I hope vigilantes get down to business cutting down these awful Jalopnik cameras!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Surely this will confuse people enough that they won't know what cameras to smack.

    I'm kinda shocked they don't either put them on next to the streetlights out of reach or pay the DOT to replace their lane activity cameras with what they need and pay them to deliver the footage back

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    That's more difficult from a jurisdictional perspective. For instance, you may an intersection of 2 streets that are owned by the city and the county with signals owned by the state but under control of a regional transportation authority formed by an interlocal agreement of 20 separate jurisdictions.

    We just did a contract in my city for a new traffic monitoring system for 3 signals in town and it involved the city, county, state, and 2 neighboring cities.

    ALPRs are poisonous enough right now you wouldn't get all 5 of those entities to sign on at once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    You just wait, soon they will be replaced with Gopnik.

  • source