lol how about y'all actually make competitive cars people want to buy first?
post
"Chinese-made". We had this exact conversation over 40 years ago. The result was Honda opening their factory in Marysville, OH. Under the laws at the time, cars manufactured at this factory were American-made, and not covered by any trade restrictions.
Now you might be thinking they'll use a different definition, like company ownership. Except Chinese companies already own minority stakes in several western brands. And since companies can own other companies, or stakes in other companies, it's trivial to setup a chain of shell companies. Chinese brands can own a company in Sweden that owns a stake in (e.g) GM.
Maybe if the US auto industry spent the last 10-15 years innovating and reinvesting instead of paying dividends and stock buybacks, it'd not be dying on its arse right now.
Made their own bed, and expecting the US consumer to keep buying overpriced swill.
What are you talking about? The American auto industry has done plenty of innovations over the past decades. They've innovatively made trucks that are 6' tall at the hood, and also have turned every brand of car into a SUV.
don't forget the advances in headlight technology. traffic will be a solved problem once cars can vaporize each other with their high beams
un-friendshape-maxxing
I do not know where all the friendly bubble-shaped cars went. I don't want an angry cube shaped like a battering ram, I want 4 armchairs with the most smooth, slick shape for low drag and impact softness wrapped around it.
If I could just buy a chinese EV I'd buy the Li Mega but its simply not allowed.
Reminder we bailed GM out AFTER they crushed thousands of cars that people wanted to buy
So car manufacturers want to block their competition?
I am shocked I tell you, shocked!
Or you know, the government could just match Chinese industry subsidies so they're competing on level playing fields.
China's government is using government power to invest in critical and necessary industries that benefits everyone, like renewables and EVs, driving down their costs.
The US instead spends it's money investing in fossil fuel companies, and letting billionaires hoard it, and then complains when Chinese EVs are cheaper. You're the richest fucking country in the world. Stop fucking whining and start using your wealth to produce competitive EVs. It's not that fucking complicated.
You forgot to mention investing in the MIC (Military Industrial Compex).
I would argue everything they do for oil and anti-electric legislation is US car subsidies.
They would have to go back in time and apply those subsidies 15 years ago. Chinese are so far ahead at this point, US stands little chance of catching up. Couldn't hurt though.
The best time may have been yesterday, but the second best time is today.
So far ahead in what way? We're talking about powering electric motors not building pico-scale computer processors. The difficult advancements in EVs is with the battery technology and battery technology is not specific to EVs themselves. We've been building cars for over a hundred years at this point so the rest of the car building process is already well established here.
Just like every other manufacturing industry where China has come to dominate, a big part of their strength is also developing the supply chain, suppliers and to foster competition. There’s an entire web of industry to support car building and scaling demand to make it work.
The money would be used for huge bonuses for the executives and US cars wouldn't be any cheaper or able to complete in the end.
Or you know, the government could just match Chinese industry subsidies
The problem is we did. The last 2-3 decades had billions in subsidies toward battery technology and battery electric vehicles. Then they got canceled. Then reinstated. Then canceled. At this point Chinas biggest advantage is being able to stay the course
Such a commitment to the Free Market.
You think that nationally subsidised and otherwise loss-making companies is the free market?
I appreciate capitalism isnt popular on lemmy but let's at least base the discourse in reality over propaganda.
The free market is about having little to no government control. Therefore any market that includes the Chinese market can not be described as a free market.
I would argue that banning Chinese companies would demonstrate more, not less, commitment to a free market.
Pretty much most if not all major US corps are being nationally subsidised.
From "bail outs" to tax breaks to grants where the company doesn't do what they are supposed to for said grant, but also don't have to pay it back.
It's just like how lobbying is just "legal" bribery.
It's all just bullshit.
nationally subsidized
Like when american auto manufacturers needed a bailout around 2011?
... Are you stupid? A free market allows for ANY competitors regardless of how the company is run or its location. By banning an entire countries products you are making the market less free for the buyer by lowering the competition for American cars.
And let's be honest US cars suck dick. I'm driving a fucking Dodge Laramie and its a piece of shit, the tech is all over the place with no normalized menus and and annoying as fuck central IPad for a dash.
Screw these guys. US automakers have basically abandoned any attempt to build an affordable, small, electric car leaving a giant gap for the Chinese to fill, and we would all be better off if they did.
I've owned a Chevy bolt for 4 years and love it, but Chevy/GM keeps trying to kill it (2nd cancellation in mid 2027) and move everybody to an electric Equinox. If they don't want to build small affordable (hopefully electric) cars, screw them, no sympathy. They clearly know people would buy these Chinese electrics.
The beatings won't stop until you buy an American car.
There's a commercial on the radio in GTA:VC. A baby is crying and the voiceover says, "This American baby is starving because you bought a cheaper, higher-quality Daihatsu!"
The US auto industry is so much more vast than US companies. We only have a few remaining ones, but everyone pretends like American brands are all that exist here in discussions like this.
rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance
I have faith in America, there's no way we're losing to china in patterns of unfair trade, subsidies, IP theft and surveillance.
The CEO of Ford publicly keeping his Chinese car tells you everything you need to know. They’re afraid of the competition
People call for reasonable Healthcare and an end to fascism. Guess which of these calls is more likely to get answered.
Skim read that as 'cheese made cars'. That was a confusing couple of seconds.
Something something free market.
The degree to which pro-capitalists are right about the benefits of competition is exactly the degree to which actual capitalists pay politicians to stifle it.
Are Chinese made cars that good, that the auto industry is scared? I say bring them on.
It's more that American cars are that bad, or at least that they're that expensive. New cars keep getting more expensive as the oligarchy realizes that they can soak people on financing.
They are also getting more expensive to repair and mechanics are quitting dealerships in droves because they don't want to a) buy specialty tools to do b) repairs that are needlessly time consuming and c) happen way too frequently to e) be paid a fraction of the repair time.
So, yeah, if someone was selling cars as good as a 2000-era Honda at a 2000-era price, they'd destroy the American market.
I don't think "good" is the problem. China can pump them out and undercut the bloated costs that US companies charge, cutting into their bottom line. That's all they care about.
Someone on slashdot (I’m really old) had a link to a yt video showing the Chevy Bolt production line and likened it to a grandmother knitting stuff for Etsy.
It's actually incredible how a >100 year old industry are being overtaken by China in just over a decade. They never learned how to manufacture. Make 12 models? Design 12 different door handles.

Found it and yeah, compared to what everyone else is doing... Yeesh.
"most desirable by the consumer" and "good" are the same thing in a capitalistic system.
There are different brands. The cheaper ones are already exporting to Latin America and other Asian countries. The couple of really highend brands are close to European ones and can definitely compete in the North American market.
They're decent enough and cheap.
It's made to compete with european made car, feature very much up to par or better with the likes of volvo and vw. They also sold cheaper compared to the competition. Reliability though, i'm not so sure. I've tried a few of them from geely, they drive pretty great, but a PITA to fix.
Of course they did. They know that they can't compete. Chinese EV and battery tech would take out the whole industry.
I'd prefer protectionism to the extent of making small, electric cars more attractive than all other cars; and to the extent of making public transit, pedestrian- & bicycle-friendly architecture more attractive than all cars.
There's a parallel universe where the US continued supporting its own domestic EV industry with more tax credits, more charging infrastructure, more grid investments and stricter corporate fuel economy standards. Maybe in that universe the automakers would attempt to compete with Chinese EVs instead of whining. Instead we elected orange man. Oh well.
rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance.
Why are they describing the US auto industry?
Congress needs to make a law/bill instead to require stringent checks that verify zero remote telemetry, crash testing/safety scores and equipment, fuel efficiency requirements, lighting/functionality requirements, etc.
Then if the Chinese ones pass, cool. If they don't then the "ban" is in place like they wanted.
My guess is they won't because the "big three domestic" manufacturers won't pass either.

all 10 comments