top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 78 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Of all the hypocrisies, I think I'm most bothered by the fact that conservative strategy these days is nearly 100% identity politics

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm more concerned about the current oligopoly of Christians in office.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The worst part is it works on a not insignificant amount people who identify with both parties.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Still reeling from a moment from a McCain rally where it more or less went:

    Woman: "But Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim!"

    McCain: "No ma'am, he's an upstanding American. I don't agree with his policies, but he's a good man."

    The implication of course being that those are mutually exclusive things.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    You could read it that way, you could also read the "no ma'am" as a rebuke, like "no, that's uncalled for, we aren't doing that here"

    I was never a McCain fan and I personally think civility politics are stupid (I want to go back to having brawls in Congress), but I think this is a case of uncharitable interpretation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (3 children)

    That's an interesting take I hadn't thought of. It's a shame he didn't elaborate so we can only speculate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's not a mystery, McCain was big into civility. We can intuit his meaning here, instead of picking the words apart

    I was nicely saying you were being an uncharitable reader/listener

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Some people just can't take an admission that they're probably right without twisting the knife.

    Here's me nicely saying I don't care what you have to say any more. Enjoy the block!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It isn't about who's right, it's about learning. Once you decide you don't need to, the rest of us will be better off with you dead

    Your block means nothing to me. A heartfelt expression of an emotion, any emotion, might move me

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I am from MI and still have alot of friends family, and aquentinces in MI. I can confirm the lonely, rural, BFE, swear he is a Muslim from Iran despite being a doctor from Dearborn, MI. They are terrified

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Good. They should be. Their entire world view on socialism, caring for others, and brown people doing nice things is about to completely implode in real time. Everything they've been told, everything they've believed, everything they completely commit their every life to is about to change. They may have to gasp have some introspective on how they view the world outside of their bubble.

    That must be fucking terrifying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    I read something somewhere... Sometime. The gist of it was that, to some people, their personal beliefs, they are so heavily vested in them, so completely inside a bubble, that anything that threatens that bubble evokes an emotional response akin to a fear of death, because in a sense, if they give up everything they ever believed in, they die. That self has to die to accept reality. And for some, for many, that deal is simply too tough to take, so they double down. Humans get set in their way, and sometimes with extreme stubbornness, and the older they get the worse it gets. At some point, you've invested so much of who you are into your whole life that is has become you. If anything threatens the cohesion of that maze of emotions and thoughts, they react with visceral fear, or aggression, to protect the integrity of their whole sense of self and personality.

    Death of ego is a scary thing. Especially in a group, and one you depend on for your survival.

    Shit, sorry if I'm rambling, there was an interesting thought in there, it's a bit Freudian but it's a thought I've mulled over for a long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Oh no, you summed up what I was trying to say far better than I did. I wasn't entirely joking in my comment. I was 100% serious (albeit with sarcastic undertones). But it's genuinely a real thing. People would rather die than change or believe anything outside of what they have known or been told to believe for so many years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Admitting you were wrong is a bitter pill to swallow under the best of circumstances.

    Imagine if your life depended on keeping the lie alive...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    What Lie? When did I admit I was wrong?

    Are you even replying to the right person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    I was continuing the conversation. MAGA can't admit they were wrong, ever, because admitting you are wrong is very hard even in simple cases. We all know that, we all feel that. Apologizing is hard, and a true life skill.

    But imagine if everyone around you is also MAGA, and all your best friends are MAGA, and your store clerk is MAGA, and your child's teacher is MAGA, and all your church members are MAGA.

    Then it becomes a matter of survival to stay MAGA, because imagine if you're the odd one out. You might as well come out as baptist in a Calvinist enclave, you know. It's a cult. You can't be wrong, because if you are, your life might as well be over.

    I hope it clears up my comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Republicans straight to point. It wrong, but straight.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Except when their Grindr match notification sound goes off, then not so much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    The match rarely goes off, mostly just hounding, even if you have a completely blank profile, some 60 year old dude will message you, like no even if I were desperate, I could literally just holler in a Walmart parking lot for a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    And now on to our most important kitchen table issue: do you condemn Hasan?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    That's kinda underselling it lol, he (and his massive audience) actively campaigns and phone banks for lots of leftist candidates. Fox News can't stop talking about him, they're terrified (and probably incredibly aroused) by him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Me: republicans are fascists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    I'm a straight guy, but his promises are really turning me on.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    As long as they aren’t evangelists I dont give a shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    they tried that with mamdani, its not working anymore. people, that live in the real world know, that Muslims arent scary. Also its getting very old and overused.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Is it a good thing that this is all they have.

    Or is it a bad thing that it will work.

    I keep remembering that even as Germany and japan were being pounded into the ground during WWII, and unimaginable suffering was occurring, large portions of their populations still widely supported Hitler and the emperor. And were ready to die for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (57 children)

    So? He can't fucking screw things up worse than you christians.

  • source
  • hideshow 57 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (56 children)

    Islam has its flaws: it oppresses women, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 56 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    That's patriarchy, not Islam. Inform yourself about christianity and you'll find much the same. It's just a different flavour of misogyny. In medieval times, arabic/islamic countries were the educated centers of culture and christian Europe was the barbaric part of the world. Now the scale looks tipped the other way. All the while, evangelical misogynists kill women by denying them life-saving treatments when they are suspected to be pregnant.

    All religions are fucked up. If any of them was truly about belief, and not controlling people (and especially women's bodies), there'd be zero need for an institutionalized belief system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    We're talking about now.
    And don't use the "no true Scotsman" thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    yeah, right now Christians, especially in the USA, opress women. row v wade was overturned as one of veeeeery many examples, they're hell bend on stripping rights and bodily autonomy from women. for most Christian idioligist in politics women are reduced to breeding machines, totally dehumanizing them. so, what's the track record of Muslims in american politics? or are you just scared?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

    idioligist

    ideologist*

    And about your message:
    Should the USA trade bad for worse?

    P.S. One of you, poor bastards, went to all my recent comments in other posts and downvoted them.
    One could only aspire to this level of pettiness 😀
    @EmptyAsparagus@piefed.social , was that you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (11 children)

    no, wasn't me, I have faaaaar better things to do. also, what would even be worse then a religious extremist group controlling multiple states and influencing the president to opress non believers? Muslims have the potential to do similar things, but Christians are right now doing it. which is worse do you think? maybe you are just scared of things you dont know

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    Muslims have the potential to do similar things

    I think they fully revealed their potential in, for example, ISIS and Afghanistan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    yes. and that is different from Muslim. evangelists are not just Christians, they're extremists. As are islamists. it's an easy concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    And root of all that evil is religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    if thats what you believe ... its more the core of moral values and it gets exploited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Wouldn't that be great to uproot one of the sources of such rot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    yeah sure and take every sort of extremism with it. sounds easy, but it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    First step is to consider religiousness of a politician a negative factor.
    Especially if said religion is a steady source of extremists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    right, Christianity totally doesnt have these problems :D they not only also opress women, they also diddle little kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Do you think I would defend Christianity? I'm not a fan of it by far.

    they also diddle little kids

    In Islam the very prophet of it had a wife of 6 at marriage and 9 when the marriage was consummated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    you didn't defend Christianity. but you're still attacking a fundamental religious group which has nothing to do with the candidate. why would you do that, when it gives the impression of conflating Muslim believe and Islamism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Because religion is a cancer.
    Religious people tend to extend their restrictions to non-believers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    and your solution is to restrict peopled believes? same thing bud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    To restrict religious beliefs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    so to restrict because of your believe system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    it's not a paradox to not mix two distinct religious groups with very different attitudes together. would you like to also say, that every christian is an evangelist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I don't see anything about Islam or women in El-Sayed's platform though, so that's irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I was addressing the OC point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Again, this only becomes relevant to policy if El-Sayed has said he plans to vote according to this or that Islamic ruling. To my knowledge he's said no such thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think we can separate a politician from their beliefs and preferences. Even if said politician isn't mentioning it in the agenda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (17 children)

    there's nothing in Islamic scripture that says "thou shalt oppress women". there may be cultural oppression but that goes for many societies irrespective of their religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (16 children)

    "no true Scotsman..."

    there may be cultural oppression

    Religion is a cultural phenomenon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (15 children)

    Nice changing the goalposts.

    You said Islam oppresses women.

    If your point is the cultural oppression of women why didn't you open with that rather than rely on lazy stereotypes about Muslims?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (14 children)

    My point is the same: Islam oppresses women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (12 children)

    It doesn't though, some Muslims do. Just like some Christians do. You got mad when someone else used a No True Scotsman argument, but "Islam oppresses women" implicitly uses the exact same argument. "Islam oppresses women, therefore any "Muslim" that doesn't, isn't practicing real Islam."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (11 children)

    It doesn't though, some Muslims do.

    I think they got the idea from islam.
    What do you think?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    You think they got sexism from a book??

    I think they got it from their stupid lizard brains just like all the Christian misogynists and secular misogynists and Jewish misogynists and Hindu misogynists and Buddhist misogynists, etc, etc. I think this all started a long time before we had the capacity for complex language or self-realization. Your line of thinking can only lead to more prejudice and hate in the world, you should abandon it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (9 children)

    It seems, authors of islam had stupid lizard brains too. And transmitted their stupid lizardness via their religious teaching.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (8 children)

    Yeah, that's what I just said. "Islam" has nothing to do with it, it's just a different color window dressing for prehistoric misogyny. The difference between something like Islam and something like fascism is that millions and millions and millions of Muslims are very good people who treat everyone with respect. So the paradox of tolerance doesn't apply, because being Muslim doesn't inherently mean being intolerant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (7 children)

    millions and millions and millions of Muslims are very good people who treat everyone with respect.

    Especially in ISIS, Afghanistan, Iran and UAE, for starters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

    You're talking about Islamists, not Muslims. I guarantee there are millions of good people that call themselves Muslims in those countries. That's how humanity works, most people are actually pretty decent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    So you agree you're a bigot! Great! Now stop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Don't use children's rhetoric, please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Just trying to get on your intellectual level. If you don't like it, stop behaving so childishly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›