all 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 2 months ago

They aren't concerned about being owned by Trump's family too?

  • source
  • [–] 87 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    Surely, they’ll approve a 9/11 flight simulator.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Could you explain what you mean?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Bosses cashed out and left the carcas to rot

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago
    [–] 35 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I’m going to get downvoted to oblivion, I’m fully aware.

    There are many things I don’t know anything about. But I do know a fair bit about this area.

    And with great respect to the worriers, this just will not happen.

    The investment team that’s bought EA have many other “western” investments they’ve never interfered with, even though they do a great deal of things that the orthodoxy in Saudi Arabia would disagree with. The layers between “what I [claim] to believe” and “make me the most amount of money” are many and includes people from all over the world. If anyone thinks Saudi royalty will sit and make determinations about what games EA will ship they can stop worrying right now. The Saudi monarchy is worrying about two things only: As much money as possible and staying in power.

    This is an investments like so many others. It will be ordered to profit-maximise - and if that requires one-upping Doom in gore, and shipping a new edition of Gay Paradise 2000 every 6 months - they will do exactly that.

    This is a complete storm in a tea cup.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The Saudi monarchy hates Islam and is shackled by it. Saudi Arabia had been on a "liberalization" plan under MBS, and it'll be western soon enough.

    They're following UAE's doorsteps, and they're even worse. You can now buy alcohol in public in UAE. You need a license (pay money and don't be Muslim) or be a tourist, but it's otherwise unrestricted. You can already wear almost nothing and you can literally be a Zionist who calls Muslims snakes and terrorist and you'll be welcomed on a red carpet.

    Saudi wants that, they just don't have control tight enough over their population to get away with that yet.

    So yes, they will not enforce Sharia on EA games, they're hoping one day they don't have to do any "moral' restrictions on content domestically. As long as it brings in money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Yeah the Saudi elites are hedonists behind closed doors. The monarchy needs to have the blessing from the clergy to stay in power so they need to be pious in public. Like it’s a open secret that the Saudi elite men fuck western prostitutes on the regular on their yachts in international waters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    You did say two contradictory things here. You said they won't interfere, but also the only thing they care about is staying in power. This isn't exclusive to them, but they will use it to maintain their power if it's useful for that. If a game was going to be critical of them, it probably won't be made. (It probably wouldn't have been anyway, because the only thing that could come from it, for the former owners, is losing investments.) Yeah, they don't care about Islam. That's fair game, but they aren't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The bigger threat is that they have no idea how to run a game company. EA was already hated for the various things they were doing to try to squeeze more of a profit out of gamers. Have a private equity company run it and that's only going to get worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    This will 100% happen. Hell, I couldn’t even leave a critical google review of a nearby middle eastern hotel because of government censorship.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Google suppression is the more prolific cause of censorship, not the least in criticisms of large firms.

    They are in effect running a protection racket. If a company pays them to not show search results, they won't show them. Ie, best buy's now since 2021 defective electronics. The only hits on social media that are even close to what you are asking for, are forums run by the manufacturers that sold you the defective merchandise.

    There is no bottom to this path we are on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

    That's not how it works. You can't pay Google to suppress links. You can only file DMCA take downs iirc. Please send me the link where I can go pay Google to remove information. I'll wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    YOU can't. I imagine large corpos have a better portal than you or I.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I've worked for large corporations. This doesn't exist. It's 100% misinformation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    As if you would know, that you think they would let you in on that part of the business destroys your credibility in truth.

    You are either quite mistaken and not able to see through bullshit, or covering for them. I suspect the former but idk it's 2026 and mechanized influence ops are everywhere, including fully autonomous ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Still waiting on any proof other than "because I said so".

    Google removes billions of links yearly, these are through government laws, court rulings and DMCA. They maintain a transparency list of these removals. You don't need to bribe Google, simply have your lawyers figure out a way to have it legally removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    What game is it that they've got in mind that is likely to be killed off? If we were talking about the EA of old then sure they would have had a point but the new corporate EA that's been around for the last two decades doesn't have anything that could be considered controversial.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The Sims has gay people in it. Saudi Arabia really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really doesn't like gay people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Women being allowed to be in public without a male guardian is controversial in Saudi Arabia, dude. It's not going to take much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Maybe the next Sims won’t fuck anymore? Or the women won’t get to be as extravagant as in previous versions ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The female sims will have a fulfilling existence, just limited to the confines of their home and subject to their husband's authority. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I doubt they can make EA any worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    But that's a good thing, because it will go down in flames the way most of us have wanted to see for over a decade.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    EA is loaded with so much debt I doubt it will even matter. They‘ll be dismantled.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It is so funny to me that the Saudis would invest into a creative industry that thrives on letting artists make what they think is right and then forbid them from doing that. And also expect that industry to then operate profitably, even though they just removed the basic foundation of that industry.

    But there is no talking and arguing with people like that, so we can just get popcorn, watch and enjoy the Schadenfreude.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    My take is that the Saudis were incredibly fortunate to be sitting on a resource that has had inelastic demand for decades. So fortunate in fact that they didn’t get good at anything else that wasn’t related to oil.

    They’ve known for some time that the oil reserves can’t sustain them forever so they’ve dabbled in investments in various industries with lacklustre results.

    Their recent foray into gaming is symbolic of this. An industry that bleeds cash without the creative talent that underpins it. I mean Microsoft is a good example of when ‘business’ intersects with the production of art.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Assholes like this have zero, ZERO, concept of why creative work is popular. Even "corporate created" work. On an extreme end, as far as they are concerned they could turn The SIMS into "Saudi Life Simulator" and people will still buy it because "Its The SIMS."

    They don't see the creativity or the why, they just see "popular brand".

    There are plenty of other examples of this out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's how the whole AAA level of the games industry already works: the people at the top greenlight what they want to greenlight.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    It's just adding a new layer to the mix when the people at the top are literally the royal family of an oppressive monarchy with openly fucked human rights practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    (looks at the current CEO's of most the big companies.)

    I mean, I get where you're going.... but it's assholes all the way up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    You're not wrong, but I feel like there are subtle levels to these things.

    If I start up a game and a logo comes up for Namco or Square Enix or whatever, most of them don't make me think, "oh, I remember that time their owners assassinated a journalist, it made the international news, and they fully got away with it anyway." That's no longer the case for an EA logo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Imagine buying an EA game. Smooth brains only.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've had a personal EA boycott going for over 10 year snow. One of the best decisions I've made and I've never regretted it once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The only time I "regretted" it was when I bought KOTOR 1 off steam, then I saw the EA credits and I used the refund policy to say "I bought this against my boycott and I didn't know EA was involved".

    I got my money back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Never been a big EA fan. .. only titles I've played is the first couple need for speeds. Battlefield, dead space and NCAA football. Before it was discontinued I'd buy it almost every year.

    I purchased the first year it came back but haven't purchased one since.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    If I was an EA employee my biggest fear would be to be cut up into tiny pieces for disagreeing with the boss. Like jamal khashoggi

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Lol Lmao even

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Imagine a game like Lara Croft, but the main character wears a Burqua.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    The Steam Reviews are amusing. Like one positive review is like "Oh, and there is a secret Zombie Survival mode!"

    And a negative review is all "There is a lame pointless Zombie Survival Mode."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Time to work for someone else..

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Sounds like an EA problem to me.

    Having not playing an EA game in over 2 decades because they are a shitty company with shitty practices that make shitty games, fuck 'em.

    Let's hope they get what they deserve.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Surprised Pikachu!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    The gay Sims are going to have a really bad time when the public beheading update comes.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Then find a new job??? If they're allegedly so morally opposed to their new bosses then why the fuck do they still work there? Let EA rot, jump on board a new studio.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Open market is great, this is what we want - money rules all

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Just keep re-releasing sport games every year with updated lineups like you've been doing and you'll be fine.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I've been worried, especially for the Sims, The Sims has been an LGBT Friendly game series since the beginning. Saudi Arabia is not very LGBT Friendly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They'll just make a new Call of Duty series where you defend Aramco oil assets from terrorist invaders.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Maybe, but I don't think the Saudi rulers are lead particularly by belief. That's just some physical world nonsense to keep the plebs in check.

    What leads them is money, and the fear that all that oil money they've relied on for the last 100 years or so is going to run out at some point.

    That's why games like It Takes Two and Mass Effect will be culled. That's why it'll be wall-to-wall live-service war-slop and sports-slop until the day everyone with even a hint of creativity quits, and then it carries on anyway in a shambling AI form. And people will still lap it up.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Quit all at once and start your own company.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Could you imagine? Having art and media freedom hindered by the bigoted, imperialistic values of an authoritarian regime?

    Anyway, hope this doesn't effect the Battlefield series. 😔

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Isn't EA the company recently making headlines for being a power and money-hungry greed machine pushing the inshittification of the digital world and subscription-based life?

    Gosh it sucks when someone with more leverage institutes unreasonable and unprecedented restrictions and demands, huh? The narcissism mind-virus is insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Projects won't get signed unless they project a 10000% ROI

    Remember that they paid 53 bil plus a huge loan that ea itself will have to pay, for something that has a 300 mil yearly profit

    Basically ea FC (or what's the name now?) will become a gambling machine to hook some whales

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    I would be surprised if EA can make anything at all after any of its current projects. They need to make more money in profits than they currently make in revenue to survive.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    in other news: water is wet.

    but i haven't bought an ea game since battlefield 3. so sounts like a them problem...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    well duh

    so quit

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    My wife is glad Paralives is out so she can ignore The Sims.

    Its way better and more inclusive.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Woaw, never coulda seen that coming.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    they will never revive CNC, especially generals which has the GLA.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*
    [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    EA? This company most people boycott now? Color me surprised...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've been boycotting EA for decades now, but I always felt like I was the only one when I talked to people outside of specific circles. Have people grown their spines or has their quality dropped enough that no one wants their shit anymore?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly, I expected rapid enshittification when Scopely bought Pokemon Go, but it's been better than when Niantic owned it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    EA has employees?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Compared to taking orders from Sweet Baby Inc of course

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago

    Isn't what woke does?

    Doesn't woke defend Islam?

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post
    12 comments in c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world view that post