Maybe we should start reviewing churches the same way: Nice church but the guy at the front was talking funny about his imaginary friend... Only two stars.
post
when people flat out refuse to consider facts, evidence, reality in forming their worldview, then the only thing left is mockery and ridicule, lest other people buy into the stupid bullshit
religion is a fucking cancer on the human species--it's causing preventable deaths ("nO iNsULiN fOr BaBy!!! PRAYING WILL FIX IT"), and it's long past time for it to be relegated to the embarrassing/shameful/fucking asinine drawer of history files
Now remember: These people are still allowed to vote...
And worse they exist in sufficient numbers for political parties wanting to cater to their views and ideas, changing the political landscape. Influencing policies, law making.
(This is a pretty echoey comment I guess)
They captured the religious racists in the south with the "Southern strategy" then Jerry Falwell captured the "religious" right with his anti-abortion message. From there we slithered into the Republican utopia of corporate dictatorship, poverty, ignorance and unaffordability.
echo "In fact, sometimes you get the impression they’re the only ones who vote." echo "" > this.nation
Religion is indeed a plague on humanity.
The problem is they turn the ridicule around to "confirm" their beliefs and push themselves further in.
Cult behavior
“God put those fossils there to test our faith!”
Always gets me.
They’d sooner believe that their god would lie to them rather than that they’re wrong.
The sad thing is that even mockery probably won’t help much, because this type of person, unfortunately, defends their ignorance with the very same, utterly idiotic strategy that allows those who control them to shield their outrageous nonsense from rational arguments: They convince their deluded followers that they belong to "the select few" who know the truth—"the enlightened", or whatever they call themselfs. Thus, they proudly flaunt their absurd ignorance, paying no heed to arguments or ridicule, since they are genuinely convinced that they are the only ones who cannot be deceived.
However, these people cannot—and, above all, do not want to—realize that the deception lies precisely in their leaders’ strategy, for that would mean, of course, that they have wasted half their lives on some charlatan who has not only shamelessly exploited them but has also made them the laughingstock of society. Their idiocy is an integral part of their self-image and their personality, which is why turning away from it often means turning away from everything by which they define themselves - and that surely is a hard thing to do.
These are the typical tactics used by cult leaders. Unfortunately, there is an frighteningly high number of people who are susceptible to them—and not just in matters of religion, as the MAGA cult makes abundantly clear: It operates according to the same logic—an in-group is formed and sworn to the cult leaders’ goals, with the immediate understanding that rationality must be replaced by slavish faith in the leader or some kind of promise of salvation, because otherwise the cult members would, of course, immediately see through all the crude lies.
It's truly amazing that even in an age when almost everyone carries the entirety of human knowledge in their pocket, it still works, but unfortunately, the internet also has the effect of bringing like-minded people together in their absurd worldview, as is the case with Truth Social, for example—though the name of this deranged platform already makes it very obvious that it is a tool designed precisely and exclusively to fulfill the aforementioned cult tactics.
Edit: Of course, you’re still absolutely right: scorn and contempt are the only things one can show toward people like this—they themselves are probably beyond redemption anyway, but openly rejecting them makes it harder for them to recruit new members for their cult. These people should be treated for what they are: a danger to society, even if they themselves are often nothing more than foot soldiers who may even be unwittingly advancing the interests of their evil masters.
It's probably corny to reference Star Wars here but Andor really nailed it with the Mon Mothma speech when she said the distance between what's said in the senate and known to be true has become an abyss and that the loss of an objective reality was perhaps the most dangerous thing to risk in a democracy. There is no common ground to have with these nutjobs because every time you offer them an inch, they'll ask for a mile more.
It's wild that some people do genuinely believe the earth is only 6000 years old.
There are human-made artefacts you can go look at in a museum right now, potentially even touch with your own hands, that are older than 6000 years old.
Even if you refused to accept other archaeological evidence, recorded human history goes back about 10000 years. So are those 4000 years worth of humans just non-existent?
((Edit - @Danquebec@sh.itjust.works is kinda right. The very earliest of proto-writing, for when one could even argue that recorded history begins, is around 6000-6600 years ago. So that actually would be within the Christian faith timeline, but just barely. And I seriously doubt the Christians had these people in mind as their earliest ancestors.))
Like it really must take some proper mental gymnastics to deny something you can see with your own eyes and say some demon made it all up specifically to fuck with Christians.
Quite easy to explain: 6000-6500 years ago, when god created the world, it put those things there during the creation process for... reasons.
Checkmate atheists!
Because he's a trickster! Haha! And if you fall for one of his tricks, he sends you to hell! For eternity!
The sanest worldview.
No, you see, the devil, who is a trickster and definitely not the same entity as God, created those fake artifacts to own the libs
And God, all-powerful and in control of everything, just let him do it. He could stop the devil but he just...doesn't.
So when someone complains like this, you ask them if they are saying God can't create 300 million year old caves when he created the world?
“I do not understand,” reads an ancient line of pictographs depicting the sun, the moon, water, and a Sumerian who appears to be scratching his head. “A booming voice is saying, ’Let there be light,’ but there is already light. It is saying, ’Let the earth bring forth grass,’ but I am already standing on grass.”
“Everything is here already,” the pictograph continues. “We do not need more stars.”
(thank you for sharing the link. i hadn't read that one yet and it's very good <3)
In North Africa 40,000 years old tools have been found as well
There is also hand stencil art in places like Indonesia and Australia from 67,800 years ago
And as I understand it, the aboriginese can actually "read" the stensils and paintings. A continuous culture over 40k years old....
It would be like we could read and understand the Lascaux Cave paintings like modern signs. And they are freshly painted compared to the Australian stuff at a mere 20k years old.
This does not get the attention it deserves
We've found 28,000 year old dildos.
To be clear, yes there are sex toys older than Christians think the world is old.
Like it really must take some proper mental gymnastics to deny something you can see with your own eyes and say some demon made it all up specifically to fuck with Christians.
Well, you can't see the age of a thing. And young-earth creationists certainly don't understand how we know the ages of things. So instead, they believe what they're told by people they trust, and those people say shit like "were you there?"
And honestly, my response (if it ever comes up) will be this: "Yes. I was there. I am God. I was there before there was. I formed this world from nothing. I am your God. Worship me." And if they question any of that, I will respond with "WERE YOU THERE?!! CUZ I FUCKING WAS!!! AND I SURE AS HELL DIDN'T SEE YOU THERE!!!" followed by "PROVE ME WRONG"
Thank you, have a nice day/night <3
We can count tree rings to 12000 years ago with our eyeballs. You don't even need any fancy tools.
For a lot of people, science is just a matter of believing in something someone tells you, no different from religion...
Well I'm pretty sure you can boil ALL science down to a simple equation. 1 + 1 = 2. Then science is built up from that. Until 1 + 1 isn't equal to 2, I'll go ahead and trust in science.
While that is a valid argument for someone to make, I'd counter by saying that science is fundamentally built on the idea of empiricism and falsifiability.
With enough time, money, and the right equipment you could theoretically retrace every discovery science has ever made, from the stone age to the modern day Dr. Stone style.
Whereas the same really cannot be said for Religion. You can't test for God. You can't discover a miracle. There's no hard evidence, only belief.
Now try explaining that to someone who thinks science is a matter of belief. Spoilers: they will stop paying attention after you say "empiricism and falsifiability".
Yeah. Fair enough. That counter only really works against someone playing devil's advocate or who would actually hear you out.
It'd have to be a bit snappier otherwise. Probably just "Every scientific discovery ever made could be retested and remade if you had enough time and money. There's no test on Earth you can do to actually show me God"
Recorded human history doesn't go back 10'000 years. It's closer to 5000 years.
You're very much right. Complex writing systems like we have now begin around 4000-5000 years ago. You can get closer to the right number with proto-writing systems, but unfortunately just barely within what the Christian faith allows.
I guess the Christians can take the W on that one, discounting all over physical evidence of humanity's existence beyond 6500 years ago.
Humanity in 6k years would be quite the speedrun at a humorous glance.
Any other perspective arguing this is absolute lunacy.
Exactly. By the time you get to 6500 years ago, humanity has already been doing settlements and agriculture that we have archeological evidence of for 1000s of years.
Judging from the estimated timeline of humanity, 6500 years wouldn't even be long enough for us to migrate beyond the hunter-gatherer system and stone tools.
Our ancestors had 100,000s of years, and we only got to settlements and agriculture maybe 10-20K years ago.
Also mind biological changes aren't really quick (but sometimes spontaneous, yes) and even I can now talk about things that happened in two different centuries. So a few thousand years aren't even that much generations (even if you count shorter lifespan but that is mostly a statistical thing due to high death rate of babies).
This exact thing happened to me when I was visiting Luray Caverns in Virginia. A kid kept interrupting the tour guide to spout this nonsense, while his parents looked on proudly. The rest of the group eventually audibly groaned whenever the kid opened his mouth. Besides the absolute nonsense the parents were happily teaching this kid to be a rude dickhead.
They are trained to act when some words are said. The parents reward this behavior because it "brings more souls to salvation". In the end it just annoys professionals and makes them unable to teach in class or to even give a tour.
Worse is it's almost guaranteed these insufferable types will suddenly clutch their pearls if you tell them to stop talking "you're interrupting my presentation" "you're suppressing the word of God. I'm the victim here, not these people I'm repeatedly annoying"
"You are using the Lord for your own Vainglory, you claim your words for His, that is Heresy at best and Apostasy in truth. You have turned your back on The Lord and thus must be silent on his workings Apostate."
I've found this tack works real good for shutting up most crazys in public spaces, I don't recommend using it in private or with people you have to interact with regularly/repeatedly.
They got lost, never to be seen again, and the rest of the tour group has no clue where they went? What a shame.
Imagine being confident that its not 300m, but unable to pin it down to the exact number of years. It was only 6000-6500 years ago, did you lose count?
Both views can be right, assuming big enough errorbars.
Earth is 6000 years old ±14 billion years.
Earth was actually created last Thursday.
Actually, no. The earth was created this morning, when I woke up. I was dropped into it in media res, complete with a backstory and the lore. It will be deleted when I go to bed tonight.
The earth will actually be retained for quality and training purposes, and your personal data will shared with our 6000 intimate partners.
Earth, the roguelike edition!
Actually all that exists runs entirely in RAM. But it's virtual RAM so nothing really exists. This is all just an illusion of existence, a false reality. Persistent potential state that is never realized.
With these errorbars, the earth was created 13 billion years in the future
The author of that review also doesn't know how to use punctuation.
"They gave inaccurate information from a Christian perspective," is most straightforwardly read as if the person giving the information is Christian.
Whereas, "They gave inaccurate information, from a Christian perspective," is what they meant, that the receiver of the information is Christian.
that immediately annoyed me as well. I was ready to discount this person's opinion before I even finished reading it.
Yeah, I had originally read it as if the tour guide was giving incorrect information, like by using religious terminology instead of B.C.E./C.E.
What if the tour guide says "300 million B.C.E."?
lol, in my defense I had that thought after only reading the first 2 sentences, and I could see a cave tour including information like "This cave was discovered in B.C.E./C.E." But "300 million B.C.E." would certainly get me to literally laugh out loud if a cave tour guide said that.
The Venn Diagram of People who believe a literal interpretation of the Bible & People who don't know how to write well, is pretty much a circle within a circle.
That makes me think. Has there ever been a person who actually wrote a lot of fiction, like a novelist or something, who read the Bible and didn't see signs that the authors were mostly either making shit up or retelling a story that they heard? Like, if it really was the inspired word of God, like God is just whispering in people's ears, you'd think an author would sense something unusual or different about the quality of the writing, but it's really no different from any old shit that some human might write.
So, it may in fact be that the only people who can believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible are people who cannot write well. Once you learn to write well, you lose the ability to believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Well, that ignores the real problem of compartmentalization, but it's an interesting idea, I think.
Yeah that confused me, but it didn't annoy me until you pointed it out lol.

top 91 comments