Photo of Emma Stone at the Paris Fashion Week in a dress reminiscent of Philomena Cunk. Comment under the photo reads "Why does she look like she's gonna ask a historian if King Arthur came a lot".

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago

    Groovy jacket, baby! Yeah!

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Emma Stone was born in 1988. Which means she missed the premier of the 1986 BBC sitcom 'Brush Strokes'.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    Have we ever seen the two of them together?

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    A Philomena Cunk reference? In this economy?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    I remember some toxic user recently said she was "not pretty, she's third or forth tier Midwestern at best" or some shit. People are strange.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    It's sorta true though for a lot of celebs. There are plenty of people you could pluck off a college campus and put a style team and personal Trainer / chef behind and would look as good as she does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I'm sure people would be so denigrating to a man about his looks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Obviously society has a more extreme and ingrained beauty standards for women but I think my statement holds for both sexes equally.

    For every movie star there are 10,000 Instagram influencers who are just as good or better looking by traditional beauty standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    What I was pointing out originally is that I think it's toxic to go out of one's way to shit on a woman's looks. The fact that it came up is the point, not that famous men or women may not be as attractive as they appear on camera. To me that very much goes without saying.

    The fact that someone found it noteworthy to point that out and then exaggerate it to say Emma Stone is not attractive seems like a pretty shitty thing to do and additionally they wouldn't have done it regarding a man. It seems like you're defending that person? I don't know, I'm not really sure what point you're making.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    sir please put your tray up the plane is about to land

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    she looks like Philomena Cunk

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Check the community you're in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Only 4 posts in past 6 months :-(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Wait ... what? Who, me? Why does it matter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    I didn't know this was here, but I support it. In spirit, not financially.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    Okay, I know the lady they are saying she looks like, but not who she is. Every time it's always a meme that references her to people who already know her, so there's never a name. Who is this red haired woman so many people know??? I gather she has some kind of show on British TV or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 months ago* (12 children)

    Diane Morgan is an actor from the UK. She got a small recurring role in some of Charlie Brooker's shows (Screenwipe, Weekly Wipe, etc) as a vox pop interviewee, alongside Al Campbell, the director.

    Her character (and Campbell's) originally had different names for each appearance, but Morgan's eventually settled as Philomena Cunk. It's meant to be an absurd name; Campbell's recurring name was Barry Shitpeas.

    Cunk's character got a couple of spinoff mockumentary specials in around 2016 where she was the presenter, and then a couple of miniseries later ("Cunk on Britain" and "Cunk on Earth"). I imagine Diane Morgan has had increasing control of the writing and the character as it's gone on.

    The shows are very funny but won't vibe with everyone's sense of humour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The overall joke of Philomena Cunk is, BBC documentaries try to be highbrow and prestigious, so what if one was hosted by someone who is thoroughly unsophisticated? My favorite individual joke is, beholding a baroque masterpiece painting, interviewing the resident art expert, she gestures to the painting and asks "What the fuck is this?"

    It's basically the same joke as having Larry The Cable Guy host an episode of NOVA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It was also like Colbert in the early days at Comedy Central, where the guests didn't realize they'd been booked for a joke interview.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I've taken it as a lampooning of documentary makers/presenters. Especially history ones. There's a definite vibe of "aren't I all fancy and knowledgeable?!" about many UK docs in recent years. The whole Brush Strokes/Technotronic thing is a jab at them trying to look cool & with the times, but missing by a mile, because they're history or science nerds! Having a dipstick presenter here adds a comedic counter to the fancy/highbrow presenters of real docs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    The shows are very funny but won't vibe with everyone's sense of humour.

    Is this a necessary detail to include? Humor is subjective, and I don't recall the character or shows ever generating controversy/backlash. Also, your statement describes all comedic content ever created...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    British humour is sarcastic and crude, much cruder than most people's taste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    On the basis of what?! Yes both aspects exist in British comedy, but there's plenty of depth too. If you're American, I can say that I'd take anything British over US comedy given what we get of that here! If you only get some of our stuff then you're not getting the full range (& vice versa).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You think I'm American when I spelled humour with "u" after "o"? I live across the Irish Sea so I get the full range of British humour. When i said crude, I don't mean unrefined, what I mean is that there is plenty of very edgy and "toilet humour" jokes. I'm saying that people not familiar or did not grow up with British humour would be taken aback and find it distasteful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Ah well I didn't assume anything, hence why I said 'if'. There's a large portion of Americans on Lemmy & my point was about how imported media is not a full representation. That said it is a moot point given your reply! (And I didn't notice the spelling, too tired at the time!).

    I see what you mean re the crudeness, & therefore why other nationalities may not take to it. Humour can be very different in other parts of the world!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Cunk on earth is amazing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Its because, like me, she was raised in Arizona and our schools were terrible. Terrible to the point where our lack of basic knowledge is apparent at a glance.🫠😜

  • source