all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This smells like an advertisement. Nobody's even played the game how can we know it over delivers?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Really shows that people don't read past the headline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    If the headline looks like an ad I'm not going to waste time reading the article. As much as I too don't like discussing an article without actually reading it I do have to decide if I want to spend my time reading it. Basically I think the title is bad and if that's not what the article is saying they should change the title. Could've been something like "Take-Two CEO Admits GTA 6 Could Have Cost More Than $80, but Rockstar Chose Restraint and Hopes To Overdeliver On Value". Make it seem like it isn't set in stone that GTA 6 is more valuable than the price.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Ah yes, Take-Two, notorious philanthropists in modern gaming.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    No, you're thinking of Double Fine. Perhaps /s is in order?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago*

    They haven't delivered shit yet; the game ain't even out. I'm still not even sure this one will be half as good as the previous games because the main writer left the company and didn't work on 6. And 5 was already kinda sloppy, story wise. Kinda hard to do parodies of action movies when the action movies of its time were also going downhill.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    Such a sacrifice! All hail!

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago

    That is a weird title, it talks about an upcoming release in the past tense.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This is why we shouldn’t quote CEOs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Translation: We know we're going to make billions on Shark Cards and don't really care about the drop in the bucket that the box price represents.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    They could price it at $5 and I still wouldn't buy it. Take-Two and Rockstar can piss off.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Value for shareholders that is.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Since people don't read anything past the headline, which is why we can't have nice things, in an interview the CEO started the following:

    So, we've established an $80 price point and a $100 price point for the regular edition and the Premium Edition of GTA 6. And I think most people felt that if we wanted to exert it, we had a great deal of pricing power. 

    This is basically the CEO trying to justify the new, and very much sounding temporary, price floor for games. Taking what Nintendo started and trying to provide more bullshit to solidify the new price.

    Probably going to be the new temporary price floor considering gamers are reportedly buying the 100 USD premium edition that has sliced content from the main game. Consumers give an inch, these assholes will take a mile and gamers are more than willing to take the abuse.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago