cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50292078

Crossposted from https://lemmy.world/post/50292024

“Today is August 4, 2026”

Text transcript available at the bottom

Transcript

There Will Come Soft Rains

By: Ray Bradbury

In the living room the voice-clock sang, Tick-tock, seven o’clock, time to get up, time to get up, seven o’clock! As if it were afraid that nobody would.

Seven-nine, breakfast time, seven-nine!

In the kitchen the breakfast stove ejected eight pieces of perfectly browned toast, eight eggs sunnyside up, sixteen slices of bacon, two coffees, and two cool glasses of milk.

“Today is August 4, 2026, the city of Allendale, California.”

Somewhere in the walls, relays clicked, memory tapes glided under electric eyes.

“”Eight-one, tick-tock, eight-one o’clock, off to school, off to work, run, run, eight-one!” But no doors slammed. It was raining outside. The weather box on the front door sang quietly: “Rain, rain, go away; rubbers, raincoats for today…”

Outside, the garage chimed and lifted its door to reveal the waiting car.

After a long wait the door swung down again.

At eight-thirty the eggs were shriveled and the toast was like stone. An aluminum wedge scraped them into the sink. The dirty dishes were dropped into a hot washer and emerged twinkling dry.

“Nine-fifteen,” sang the clock, “time to clean.”

Tiny robot mice thudded against chairs, whirling their mustached runners, Kneading the rug nap, sucking gently at hidden dust. Then, they popped into their burrows. The house was clean.

“Ten o’clock.” The sun came out from behind the rain. The house stood alone in a city of rubble and ashes. This was the one house left standing. At night the ruined city gave off a radioactive glow which could be seen for miles.

“Ten-fifteen.” The garden sprinklers pelted the windowpanes,

running down the charred west side where the house had been burned evenly

free of its white paint. The entire west face of the house was black, save for five places. Here the silhouette in paint of a man mowing a lawn. Here, as in a photograph, a woman bent to pick flowers. Still farther over, their images burned on wood in one titanic instant, a small boy, hands flung into the air; higher up, the image of a thrown ball, and opposite him a girl, hand raised to catch a ball which never came down.

The five spots of paint – the man, the woman, the children, the ball –

remained. The rest was a think charcoaled layer.

“Twelve noon.”

A dog whined on the front porch.

The front door recognized the dog voice and opened. The dog, once huge and fleshy, but now gone to bone and covered with sores, moved in and through the house, tracking mud.

The dog frothed at the mouth, ran wildly in circles, biting at its tail, spun in a frenzy, and died. It lay in the parlor for an hour.

“Two-fifteen.”

The dog was gone.

In the cellar, the incinerator glowed suddenly and a whirl of sparks leaped up the chimney.

“Two thirty-five.”

Bridge tables sprouted from patio walls. Playing cards fluttered. Martinis manifested while music played.

But the tables were silent and the cards untouched.

At four o’clock the tables folded back through the paneled walls. “Four-thirty.”

The nursery walls glowed.

Animals took shape: yellow giraffes, blue lions, pink antelopes, lilac panthers. Hidden films clocked through well-oiled sprockets, and the glas walls lived. It was the children’s hour.

“Six, seven, eight o’clock.” The dinner dishes manipulated like magic

tricks, and in the study a click.

“Nine-five.” A voice spoke from the study ceiling:

“Mrs. McClellan, which poem would you like this evening?”

The house was silent.

The voice said at last, “Since you express no preference, I shall select a

poem at random.” “Sara Teasdale. As I recall, your favorite…

“There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,

And swallows circling with their shimmering sound;

And frogs in the pools singing at night, And wild plum trees in tremulous white;

Robins will wear their feathery fire, Whistling their whims on a low fence-wire;

And not one will know of the war, not one Will care at last when it is done,

Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree If mankind perished utterly;

And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn Would scarcely know that we were gone.

At ten o’clock a falling tree bough crashed through the kitchen window

shattering cleaning solvent over the stove. The room was ablaze in an instant.

“Fire!” screamed a voice. Water pumps shot water from the ceilings while the voices took it up in chorus: “Fire, fire, fire!”

The house tried to save itself, but the wind blew and sucked upon the fire.

Scurrying water rats pistoled their water, and ran for more. And the wall sprays let down showers of mechanical rain.

But too late. The quenching rain ceased. The reserve water supply which had filled baths and washed dishes for many quiet days was gone.

From attic trapdoors gushed a green chemical.

But the fire was clever. It had sent flames outside the house, up through The attic to the pumps there. An explosion! The attic brain which directed the pumps was shattered.

The house shuddered, its bared skeleton cringing from the heat. And the voices wailed, “Fire, fire, run, run,” like a tragic nursery rhyme, a dozen voices, high, low. One, two, three, four, five voices died.

Other choruses could be heard announcing the time, playing music, or cutting the lawn by remote-control mower. A scene of maniac confusion, yet unity; singing, screaming, and one voice, read poetry aloud in the firey study, until all the film spools burned.

In the kitchen the stove could be seen making breakfasts at a psychopathic rate, ten dozen eggs, six loaves of toast, twenty dozen bacon strips, which eaten by the fire, started the stove working again, hysterically hissing!

The crash. The attic smashing into kitchen and parlor. The parlor into cellar, cellar into sub-cellar.

Smoke and silence.

Among the ruins, one wall stood alone. Within the wall, a last voice said,

over and over, “Today is August 5, 2026, today is August 5, 2026, today is …”

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (26 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    It's a story about the dangers of AI that also is set on the date it was posted (August 4, 2026) in another community from which this one is crossposted from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    In what way is it about the dangers of AI though? If anything, it's about the dangers of nuclear war with the backdrop of a smart home falling apart

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    The over-reliance on automated tech is presumed to be what lead to the loss of humanity. Like Skynet in The Terminator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    This is true, but it can be both, especially if you read it with Fahrenheit 451 in mind, where technology is clearly having a detrimental effect on peoples empathy. And the ability to think for yourself is oppressed. Which is why books are banned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    much like every piece of art, there is room for interpretation, and each new interpretation breathes new meaning, even if unintended by the creator. someone obviously read this, connected the dots for it to also mean AI or unchecked automation was responsible for the obivous nuclear war. which was the original message. one can only assume the cause of the nukes flying, but due to the heavy focus on the houses automation. it can also be considered or assumed that perhaps maybe that automation stretched further than the home itself. perhaps since everything in the home was automated, then maybe OTHER things were automated as well. like nuclear control. nuclear war is the result of the absence of human empathy, and machines dont have empathy. so it can be be a potential reality where in this automated world, that they automated war as well. much like we do today.

    and so, both interpretations now exist in the world.

    and that may frustrate you, or upset you, or piss you off, or go against your line of thinking. but the existence of the interpretation makes it real. maybe not to you, but to others. and thats okay.

    its a part of human nature, and cultural evolution. we apply stories from the past to the happenings of the now. like 1984. it was written about totalitarianism. but generally many people with a surface level understanding use it as an example of a communist dystopia. to them, communism bad. full stop. but in its words its stretches much farther than its main themes and plots.

    subtext, subplots. the intended or uninteded interpretations of the reader are things every author understands are inevitable. as should every reader.

    if this wasnt the case then there wouldnt be dozens or hundreds of variations and sects of religious doctrines born from the bible, quran, torrah, etc. but there is.

    different times, different meanings, different interpretations. some more agreeable, some violently opposable.

    im not agreeing or disagreeing, i am merely sondering between the many view points that exist here,and playing the advocate for a line of thinking that may expand your own, or not.

    who knows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    If anything, it's a bit of a sad story about automated conveniences continuing their task after the people using them are long dead.

    Every morning, the house would continue to greet the dead to a morning they will never see, opening the doors to allow passage for a car forever left undriven, readied for a work commute that they can no longer take.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    It most definitely was when it was written, but to me it's a story about the obsession for idyllic automation (or more broadly, "progress" in the individualistic sense) while ignoring real dangers. Back then it was nuclear war, but today it could be climate change, fascism, AGI, or whatever else

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago*

    Hmm my take on it is that nuclear war has taken place, and it's about how the house tragically keeps performing its duties not knowing that the human inhabitants are long dead.

    And yes, automated tech exists in the world of this story but I don't see that as 'AI' any more than I'd view a teasmade (a kettle with a timer) as AI.

    For the sake of argument say that the story did include some form of AI. I think AI in science fiction is actually quite interesting (especially stuff from several decades back) because it tends to have some nuance, and isn't the crappy LLM stuff that we're getting in real life. My understanding is that this community is more about how shitty LLMs are.

    *edit - I think you updated your post to mention Skynet just after I responded, and that's exactly my point. That's an example of an ACTUALLY COOL concept of AI, and I think most people like those films

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago

    I see this as a possible dystopian future of the human race, a future where nothing of value is left, only thing that is left is the simile of life, and if our current models of AI is the only thing to survive, we might as well not have been here at all, every truth and fact will be torn apart by hallucinating machines...

    but then again, art is subjective.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (16 children)

    Synopsis by Google about Ray Bradbury on AI:

    The Danger of Complacency: Works like Fahrenheit 451 and "There Will Come Soft Rains" warned against letting screens, automation, and convenience erode human agency, deep reading, and genuine emotional empathy

    Edit:
    if you read it with Fahrenheit 451 in mind, where technology is clearly having a detrimental effect on peoples empathy. And the ability to think for yourself is oppressed. Which is why books are banned. This is clearly a general result of technology humanity can not control.

    Today that image is very much about AI, where for Ray Bradbury that idea was more abstract, but he clearly desccibes machines that to some degree are thinking, and in Fahrenheit 451 clearly to the degree where humanity is controlled by the technology instead of humanity controlling the technology.

    Regarding my original response being formulated by an LLM, I believe there are situations where they do a decent job.
    Which I thought it did in this case.

    I'm absolutely against AI being used to create for instance AI slob, or creating reports for government decision makers. But for banal tasks they can do a decent job IMO, and having read Ray Bradbury, my original post absolutely reflects what my own interpretation very closely.

    You may consider it lazy, but it isn't wrong.

    Edit 2.
    To all those that claim this is just another nuclear Armageddon story, what then is the purpose of describing a highly automated society, that keeps running after the people are dead?
    People here apparently wouldn't be able to see an elephant if it stood right in front of them, because it doesn't fit their prejudiced opinions, they will simply deny its existence. 🤡

    Finally the description about the tree falling and the house trying to save itself, is an indication of the excessive use of automation is a fragile foundation for civilization, showing the story clearly goes beyond being only about the nuclear Armageddon in its meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Yes because in this instance the AI is right.
    Go ahead and read Fahrenheit 451 and you will be able to see it very clearly.
    The tech society manipulated by media that very much look like AI is losing empathy and ability to think critically for themselves.
    The technology controls society not the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    it’s EXPLICITLY a story about the threat of nuclear devastation.

    And how do you think that happened? This is written in 1950, with strong memories of Nazi Germany and the beginning of the cold war. Nuclear war is clearly also about human empathy, and how it might not save us from disaster. But my guess is that you never read Fahrenheit 451.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Second, you’re using a fucking slop machine in a group that is explicitly against the use of slop machines you utter buffoon!

    Not everything AI is slop, you are acting like a religious fanatic.
    I am totally against AI slop, but the existence of that although pretty overwhelming at times, does not mean everything AI is slop.
    But this sub is apparently religiously narrow minded.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Rofl. As well as being tone deaf, that doesn't actually capture what the story is about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Yes actually it does, even if you don't see it, it is pretty obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Well I'm not going to say your interpretation is wrong, if that fits what you think of the story that's valid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    As a matter of opinion, is it a dogshit interpretation? Yes. Did reading it make me feel so sad and lonely that as a piece of art this crie de coeur that surely must ring in all our hearts at similar frequencies was reduced to a leaden summary by what sounds like a failing MBA student desperately trying to bump up their GPA with an elective they didn't bother thinking about? Yes, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    So you read Bradbury and had an opinion, but still felt the need to ask a machine to validate your opinion? Don't you see the irony of doing that while quoting "erosion of human agency and deep reading"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I made a google search to find a source, but the AI response reflected what I wanted to write, and I chose that as a source instead. And I was completely upfront about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Still exactly my point. You could've searched your memories or read a source and formed an independent thought, instead of going for the ready-made no-thought option. To be clear, I don't blame you personally, brains and life in general prefers to be efficient and not have to do work it doesn't have to do, I'm just saying that it's deeply ironical to post an AI overview about how AI erodes reading and thinking skills and then saying you agree with it. Do you believe Google and the current AI sphere are not adjacent entities to those that Bradbury and Orwell describe in their dystopian futures? The Google of today is not the same friendly page that helps you find cool stuff on the internet it used to be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That's really not the feel I get from this short story. The house cooked food for the family to eat all together, they were shown to be playing in the yard when nuclear disaster occurred, they seemed to have regular bridge gatherings (from those outside the family I suspect), had reminders of birthdays/anniversaries of those outside the family, and had enrichment through poetry and the jungle/savanna scene in the nursery.

    These aren't the marks of tech-slaves wasting away like in Wall-E. These were people that seemed to have been living an idealized life with lots of convenience. The house could have weeded the garden but the mother did it for pleasure. The kids could just have the house show them a stream of content but they played outside. The father could have just sat and smoked in the parlour but he had a social group.

    It's a story about how even with a highly advanced life, it can be wiped out in an instant. This house persisted for probably years before a sudden fire decimated it in an hour. It's telling us to cherish the things we have, not warning us that the things strip us of our humanity. Did they take these things for granted? Almost certainly. But it wasn't a lack of empathy that killed the family.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    The second I saw Cyrillic with English subtitles I knew I was either in for a trip or something surprisingly beautiful and surreal animation wise. I swear, Eastern block animation was its own beast, with such beautiful looking, yet dread causing, animations like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I liked this. thanks for sharing.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Also check out the reading by Leonard Nimoy that was just posted today. It’s a good listen.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 28 comments in c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Kinda scary how close this is to today,

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    When posting this I thought, I’m not sure if this counts as Sci-fi anymore.

    It’s just way too plausible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    The implausible part is how non-enshittified the technology seems to be, it's not even spying on the residents of the house enough to know that they are not there, it asks for a preferred poem to read as a first option and then uses RNG instead of going straight to the online hell-algorithm. The servers are even self-hosted. I would expect a real fully featured smart home to be way more dystopian than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    In a lot of ways I think the climate catastrophe got ignored for so long because of the impending fear of immediate nuclear annihilation. The specific anxiety Bradbury is writing about here though is about the death/collapse of humanity which is an anxiety that has permeated culture and society since its institution. What he didn’t see coming is that it would probably be a much slower and more inevitable collapse due to climate change. In both cases the fire still represents the same thing though, change, entropy, chaos or whatever you want to call it. The death of humanity is as inevitable as the death of an individual. What makes the inclusion of the poem by Teasdale so good is that she was capable of seeing the beauty in a world that never stops changing, one that would inevitably throw off the shackles of whatever order we may try to impose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I had the same thought reading Dream Hotel. Technically it is sci-fi, but the only sci-fi thing is the implant, the rest is reality turned up to 11 (discrimination, prison labor, black box AI tech, privacy abuse)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago*

    The line "...hands raised to catch a ball which never came down" has stuck with me for over 30 years now. Such an eerie visual.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    What godamn magnificent writing. 😢

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    you know this seems familiar. I read so many books of short stories when I was young and I never really thought about the authors as I dived into the stories. Some were like asimov and such which I recognized when I read books but I never payed attention to the authors or even the titles much with the short stories.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The modern take on "automation that survived the apocalypse" is Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky. It's an entire novel, more humorous, but still very dark.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Is that the one that ends with the fire suppression system? I was so young when I read that I envisioned robotic heads spewing stuf from their mouths. The blue bottle is a better story though. "Driving Blind" I thought was good. He was very prolific.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    This story, the genetic evil one from dandelion wine (I think), and the blue bottle really stuck in my head. There was one with a premise like 451 about a guy who took evening walks instead of watching tv, and got picked up by a robotic cruiser, that one stuck to me too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Bradbury is amazing. The date in this story gives me a chill.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Anyone who wants more Bradbury should start with The Illustrated Man collection. He's got tons of great short stories in general but that one in particular had so many bangers

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I remember reading this in one of our class books when I was maybe eleven and it damn right fucked me up. I was so moved by the lonesome atmosphere, and I suspect it's one of the early things that made me so much into post apo a few years later.

    Bradbury was a rare voice in classic sci fi, and one of my all time favorites.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago
    5 comments in c/shortstories@literature.cafe view that post
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    One of my top favorite Bradbury stories.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Same, and I love how he later wove it in to The Martian Chronicles, another masterpiece.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Timely and timeless. Thanks for posting!

  • source