top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 109 points 3 months ago (5 children)

figma is not free software, and neither is davinci resolve. use penpot and kdenlive.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Free as in beer, not as in speech, and DaVinci Resolve at least has a $295 upgrade for additional features, although last time I looked that upgrade is included with certain hardware purchases from Blackmagic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yea it's not free but it's a once off, keep for ever price.

    I'm happy with that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I still like the traditional model for paid software where you pay once, and then future major upgrades can be purchased for a discount; it seems like a fair way for the developer to support continued development while allowing the customer to decide if they prefer to stay on an older version.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Pretty sure neither Figma or Resolve are free software.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Davinci Resolve has a free version that is missing some features. They are important features, mind. But it definitely allows you to edit videos and get a good feel for the software to see if you want to purchase it or you can just keep using the free version even.

    So it's free*.

    And the paid version is buy once and get a perpetual license. Very non-scummy for a full professional video editing tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Figma? No, I won't fall for that again!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Figma is NOT free software. It is proprietary, and hosted.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Blender is an alternative to 3DS Max in the same way an actual car is an alternative to flintstoning a burnt out wreck. Even in college a lot of our very basic rendering exercises with Max got the whole grade just on demonstrating correct setup because the software is so prone to crashing or taking 20h to do what most alternatives (paid or free) can do in 20 minutes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    You're saying Blender is better? I've only used Blender, but I would believe it. It's like opposite of how I feel about GIMP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yeh, admittedly I have a lot more experience with blender than 3DS Max, but from performance differences alone I'm pretty sure if Max released today without its massive pre-existing industry adoption it would be laughed out of the room.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    I use this site a lot

    It tends to be pretty straightforward about what an alternative can and can't do. The tags work well for searching so you can exclude paid or freemium apps.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Don't forget about FreeCad!

    They had an update earlier this year that really closed the gap on a lot of features and tools they were missing compared to other more established cad packages.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Gimp is apparently great if you start with it, but it is not a substitute for Photoshop.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Important one:

    Adobe acrobat: fork to the eyes. (Jokes aside, I'm using Stirling pdf viewer right now, it's nice)

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 3 months ago (25 children)

    Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.

    Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I'd suggest Krita before Gimp, and even Affinity (although I'm sure there's a gotcha coming with that one)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    GIMP is also a massive pain in the ass. Paint.net is the one piece of software I still miss after moving to Linux.

    Da Vinci Resolve is great though. Crazy that it's free and Linux compatible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Gimpshop i think it's called at least tries to make the GIMP workflow and UX (including keyboard short cuts) not completely, well, gimped.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Yeah GIMP is shit. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they’re talking about. Inkscape is better than gimp but still suffers from UI issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Quality features often confuse people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Nah, pretty sure it was the ai jammed in everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    So then you admit that pre-AI Photoshop was significantly better than gimp. Thanks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I wouldn’t actually know. I don’t use Adobe Products.

    But if you exclude the AI features, and don’t make “anti-ai” your entire personality, gimp is pretty shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    ...?? Gimp is what it is. It doesn't hold your hand-and there is admittedly an element of bootstraps. But once you are used to it, it will do what most people need it for.

    Why have such aggressive opinions on software you apparently don't even use?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    I need a Lightroom alternative, on linux.
    Edit: Looks like rawtherapee is a good one. Funky name though...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Surely there's something better than Gimp.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Krita, definitely, though it's still not as complete in capability it's a much better analogue

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?

    To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago*

    Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist's first time seeing a platypus and assuming it's an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn't software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    OpenShot is also a remarkably capable and easy-to-use video editor - https://www.openshot.org/ . I use it almost daily for editing screen capture videos.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    This year i first saw an ad for Photoshop, i see this as a sign of them losing. Keep up the good work folk!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    This image is crusty

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Any one else looked into Graphite? I first found it as a vector editor, but it seems to have widened its scope a fair bit

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    You couldn't pay me to use Gimp. The interface offends me.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You can theme it to change icons and sizes and such, which helps a little. But I agree, the interface is a nightmare. Ever since v3 came out, my layers window has disappeared and I can't find it. That's a kind of important panel to hide away :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You couldn't pay me to use Adobe. The predatory pricing, required internet, Linux incompatability, file scanning, Adobe Bridge, bad privacy policy, bloated install, useless launcher, DRM, and use of AI offends me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Techphobic, nonprofessional opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Anyone have the one where it's all vim lol?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    How good is DaVinci Resolve on Linux? I have been wanting to switch for a long time now, but I read online that DaVinci doesn’t work that well on Linux, so has it gotten better?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It works best with NVIDIA drivers and with the least workarounds in RHEL type distros (officially it supports Rocky Linux).
    Decoding and encoding is really limited, especially in the free version. There's details about codec support in their website.

    If you pay for it, and you're already used to distros like Fedora, Rocky, RHEL it pretty much works out of the box. Only Fedora requites some tinkering. There's also tools and workarounds for distros like Arch AFAIK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›