clearly never been in a German train
post
Americans IRL: (Standing in the TSA queue at the airport) “Train? What’s that?”
I've had to take a train from Boston to NYC and back a few times. Round trip, it costs anywhere from $200 to $500 depending on whether you want to leave / arrive at a reasonable time or not, and it takes about 5 hours each way, which is slightly longer than driving takes. Incidentally I can fly from BOS to JFK round trip for about $200, assuming reasonably early booking, and the flight is about 1 hour. So this doesn't surprise me at all.
Had a similar comment in mind. The cost for a coach seat on a train to the nearest destination city that there's actually a route to costs about 3x as much as a round trip flight (budget airline) and takes over 24 hours. I would prefer rail were it practical, but it's not.
No secret that our rail systems suck though. I have taken trains in Europe and Japan, and those experiences were great!
I'm not disagreeing with you but I think we all need to start including airport hassle time into our statements of flight times. In my limited experience train stations involve less of that bullshit, although obviously you can only go when the train is ready, as opposed to starting your car and hitting the highway. Neither Logan (Boston) nor LaGuardia (New York) is swift or easy, especially if you have any baggage, and there is also the travel time to actually get into the city, which can easily add another hour in traffic. Train stations tend to be in the heart of downtown.
(Tbf, I in Los Angeles live much closer to LAX than to Union Station so ymmv)
Train stations definitely have less bullshit, but it's a 5h trip vs a 1h trip in this case. I could have spent 3 hours in the airport before the flight each way and added 30 minutes to get from the train station to the airport and back, and still saved time by flying.
Well I certainly acknowledge our train system sucks. Try comparing LA-to-NYC times. Or LA to Pittsburgh. Or DC. Just adding to the difficulty, there seem to be 2 completely separate systems (still both Amtrak) that you have to change over in Chicago. And the 3 hour layover isn't considered reliable enough to book as one trip, you have to plan to spend the night there.
I have one hour flights (three hours including time traveling to and from airport) that are 24 hour train trips. Twenty six including time traveling to and from the station. Monetary costs are equivalent. Like, some areas aren't conducive to rail.
flight time is actually closer to 80-90 minutes between the two cities. plus taxi time of 10-20+ minutes at each end.. plus dealing with getting to and from the airport, maybe parking, and random tsa shenanigans inside.
compare that to the actual 3.5 hour acela route that starts at ~ $74, that directly connects midtown manhattan to south station or back bay.
That price is certainly not representative of what was actually available when I was booking. There were $99 tickets but only if you wanted to leave at 5AM or arrive after 4PM. If you want to leave between 8-10AM and arrive at a reasonable time, there were no coach options and business class was $200+.
I went and checked JetBlue before posting that and they had $101 flights that were listed at 1h 14m, so that's what I was basing those numbers on.
Can't find the Boston->NYC confirmation, but here's one from around the same time from Penn Station in Providence. This was the cheapest seat available on this train; the cheaper ones were only available if you left before 6AM or after 11AM. This train got in at about 1:30 PM, so 3h 45m from RI.

Let's also compare that time to the round trip of Boston (back bay) to Worcester (union station) and back using the regualr commuter rail. The amount of time it takes to get from Boston to Worcester via CR, is a plane to New York and back.
Driving vs CR is a crazy difference that no one likes to admit or acknowledge.
It takes literally ¼ the amount to drive to Worcester from greater Boston than it does to take a CR from back bay. But not one will ever say it, they'll all say we need higher speed trains.
This happens in Europe too.
A few years back I had to go to my company's northernmost office. It took about 20 hours of travel, 19 hours of which was on trains, and I didn't even reach my destination. The train couldn't get far enough because of the snow, and was replaced with a bus. Only I couldn't go on it, and so my company shelled out about another $170 for a taxi from one town to the other.
All in all, trip there and back costed ~$500, not counting the taxi.
Meanwhile, looking now, I could take a flight instead. I'd have to take a train or a bus to the airport, that'll take about two hours of course, but it'll cost me about $30. The flight will take 1½ hours, and will cost $150 including the trip back. So, about $210 for the entire trip.
Same story with trains through Sweden. Takes too long and is somehow more expensive.
Trains had their chance after 9/11 and blew it. If they were as cheap as the airlines it would’ve become the way to travel (especially considering no TSA).
It can and often is worse for the environment in the US too. Pretty much anywhere outside the NE corridor.
It really depends on where your starting and ending destinations are. Also, if you book Acela far enough in advance, which you’re assuming for the flight, it’ll usually be cheaper than flying, especially factoring in the cost of getting to the airport.
A reporter tried this back in 2021 and there was only a five minute difference between train and flying. Trains are also less affected by weather.
Every situation is unique, but I’ve found the train to be the better option on several occasions.
https://www.businessinsider.com/timing-myself-taking-the-train-and-flying-between-ny-boston-2021-3
Flying pre-9/11 was a whole different ballgame. Flying domestically in Japan is pretty close, especially at the smaller regional ones. My closest airport doesn't even fly to Tokyo because everyone just takes the shinkansen (bullet train)
Similar to IRL Canadians. If you're anywhere between Montréal and Windsor then I don't understand why you'd suffer an airport when the train is just a vastly nicer experience
Well it depends on needs too. I tried to explain this before is that if you're 4 hours away in travel for something that could be done in 1 hour worth of travel, something that's as important as your mom dying; Are you gonna take the 4hour train or the 1hour plane?
Houston Texas. Population 2.3m. Number of inter city trains a day: 2. One in each direction.
The service only operates 3 days per week. That's 6 trains per week, total. 3 in each direction.
Sounds like something from the wild West.
It kind of is the wild west. In some cases, I think the track infrastructure is still exactly the same as it was from the old West days. There are some really breathtaking railroad bridges to go over, but they're also limited to 15 mph because they're so old. West Texas still has many miles of completely un-signaled "dark territory".
This line traverses the Gadsden Purchase, a big chunk of Arizona that the US had to buy from Mexico in order to build this railroad. Back in 1854.
This is why I moved to Massachusetts after growing up in the south: the trains here might be old, late, and apparently catch on fire once in a while from what ive heard, but we have trains.
No, that the train being only seconds late is a Japanese thing. In Europe we have anything between "No Train Today" to "Train passed through the station without stopping"
Ooh look at that shiny metal track. I wonder if it is ever used. Fable has it that great carriages arrive, and distant rattling and horns can sometimes be heard, but no one knows for sure...
I lived somewhere with good busses. When the bus drove by without stopping (after dark, an hour before service was supposed to end) I felt like choosing violence
I was early to the train station with my coworker. We met a lot of people still waiting for the train before ours on the same platform. Suddenly, that other train was dropped from the display and replaced by our train. Seconds later, their train simply rushed through on a different track.
I've heard of those trains. Or rather I saw one in a movie about a train that had to "speed" around a city keeping its "speed" over 50 and if its "speed" dropped, it would explode. I think it was called... "The Train That Couldn't Slow Down."
No, the train just skipped a station, and our train, going in the same direction, was coming in almost on time a few minutes later.
It was a bit crowded, though, and of course they lost their seat reservations.
Yeah those are common in Europe. Most people just wave at Sandra when they pass by.
It really depends on the part of the US. Amtrak is very reliable in the north east. Lot of the commuter train services are quite good as well. Subways and metros are pretty good in most of the north east as well.
Amtrak is much more limited in its coverage on the west coast, but still ok from what I’ve heard. BART in the SF area has good ridership although it needs some more investment, LA is doing some big expansions right now as well.
Chicago has a good but a bit old transit system as well. The Amtrak from NYC/DC to Chicago is a long but pleasant ride, about 18 hours; but this is to be expected given that the distance is 1146 Km (714 miles) which is about the same as Brussels to Warsaw, and most of the routes for that appear to be about 18 hours as well.
I’ve heard some rumblings about projects in the Pacific Northwest, but it’s not really something to write home about as it stands. Needs more investment and not to have the projects price gouged by contractors.
Some mid sized cities and towns all over the country will have decent bus services, some even a light rail or two, but it’s a coin toss.
The South West, Mountain west, South East and Midwest (outside of Chicago and the twin citiest) absolutely atrocious, like, you are basically screwed if you don’t own a car. Like there are a few example of decent local transit systems in particularly big cities but their ridership and coverage are pathetic given the size of the cities and there aren’t any plans for serious expansions on the scale that needs to be happening. Regional rail is just… hope you like a 2 week train ride where you’re spending half the time waiting for 40 mile long trains full of gravel to pass.
I saw an opportunity to share this: Where are America's trains? by the very excellent edutainment channel Climate Town
Slovakians: "Our train was less than 2 hours late AND didn't crash, awesome!"
Edit: Some context
Trains are frequently late.
As for crashes, some timeline and pictures:
2025-10-13 - Jablonov nad Turňou

2025-11-09 - Pezinok

2025-12-09 - between Liptovský Mikuláš and Liptovský Hrádok
Just a few meters from crash

2026-06-05 Krpeľany

Someome has never been in Italy
South American transit user: "there's a train?"
I was that European transit user years ago. I did buy a BMW because I hated the train system, but crashed it and then bought a Saab. I sold it 3 years ago and bought an electric bike. Only take the train like twice a year or so. When I go to Berlin for a weekend trip or something. But then I'm using DB which is way worse than the trains in my country, so I won't use trains for a while after that. Taking the train to the station where the ICE stops: 2 minutes delay. FFS... ICE: 3 hours late, doesn't stop here anymore, need to take another train to a other station to get it. FUUUUUUUCK DB! YOU'RE NOT EVEN IN GERMANY YET AND ALREADY FUCK EVERYTHING UP! Wo ist der Deutsche pünktlichkeit eh?
I like trains and all I want more. But I'm 100% will never not own a car. Far too fun.
Interesting. For me, driving is only ever fun on a wide open, flat, straight road, with beautiful scenery, and where you can get away with speeding because there's no one else around. Anything short of that and driving ranges from "unpleasant" to "hell on earth".
Hey, for some of us, knowing exactly what speed to maintain on a congested roadway in order to never touch the brakes and break the "waves" of stop-and-go for everyone behind us is also "having fun". Doubly so when the Karen behind you completely loses their shit and starts raging, even though your driving style is actually helping them out. Let's just hope they're not strapped...
This is so me, find the right gear and feather the clutch, never touch the brakes.
Breaking the waves is how I get 45-50 mpg on commutes in my 2012 Civic. And that's with the air conditioning turned on. If I maintain a fairly steady 50-60 miles an hour, I will easily go 400+ miles on a tank.
Y'all have such wild imaginations.
I used to think that way. I live in rural Japan now so basically have to have one to do anything useful (especially buying farm stuff). But I lived without one for like 6 years, had I not moved so rural and begun to farm, I probably would still not have one.
I'd like to hear more about this Japanese rural farm
I mostly grow hot peppers since they were hard to find fresh when I came here. I have a full English website and support for people who want/need it. Of course, the year I bought the place and started farming, another site revamped and added English support which kinda destroyed the advantage I thought I would have, heh.
I love driving cars as much as I love wrenching on them. That is to say it's among my favorite things when I want to, and I want to stick a red hot poker in my eyes when I have to.
Far too fun.
Wait till you get a good mtb ebike. In summers, I don't feel like using a car.
Actual American transit users:
Not so fast! My trains are very late (I'm in EU)
You obviously never been to France.
UK train travel is abysmal, it's often trained just get straight up canceled or delayed, I was stuck for 2 hours on a 30 minute journey last week it's incredibly stupid
This is wildly overstated. In the period Jan-Mar, 86% of station stops were made within 3min of the timetable, with a cancellation rate of only 3.2% of services.
However, extensive hot weather is playing havoc with everything, rail no exception. Heat affecting equipment, medical emergencies, buckling track, even the ground drying out so much the trackbed is becoming unstable in some places.
British rail travel is quite punctual as a whole, despite being complex and near-saturation and prone to knock-on delays.
And I didn’t see anyone pissing or masturbating!
also the american ones are not HSR and are very limited to a few regions. being extremely car centric, public transportation is often neglected.
I can guess which seats are soaked with pee, too!
Curiously, I've never seen a seat on public transit soaked with pee. If the seats that you sit in are routinely pee-soaked, one might start to draw some conclusions about the source of the urine...
On the one hand I'm happy lemmy is gaining traction in the wider culture on the other hand it sucks to see Deutsche Bahn posting their propaganda here.
In my experience the MARC is pretty reliable. And mostly empty.
Not that I disagree in general, but funny to me to choose that one specifically.
all 100 comments