all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 3 months ago

in case anyone is wondering the answer is A.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago*

    e. Just one, but wouldn't it be better to spend 6 months making a program that screws in light bulbs automatically? We could save a whole minute of developer time per bulb. It'd pay for itself in developer time after just... lessee... 6 months times 30 days per month times 24 hours per day times 60 minutes per hour... 2.6 million automated bulb screw-ins or so.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    e. Two, but the real trick is getting them in there...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    D. Final answer.

  • source
  • 53 comments in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 60 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    100, 1 to hold the light bulb and 11 to de bug the house

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 109 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    All four answers work though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I like: how many Germans does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    One. They are very efficient, but not very funny.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 44 points 3 months ago

    It makes me think about how many country artists it takes to change a light bulb....

    Six. One to change the bulb while the other five sing about how good the old one was.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    For the d) answer:
    (On my work laptop)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Where can I get this sticker?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    "If a programmer can change a lightbulb in 5 minutes, 5 programmers can change a ligthbulb in 1."

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    So if a couple can have a baby in 9 months, 9 couples can have a baby in a month?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Assuming no communication overhead, yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    The real answer is management needs atleast 3-5 meetings to first discuss this with 10 developers 10 upstream developers 10 downstreams developers and business team for all. And after we spent 2-4 weeks of all this a lone developer who's been saying we just screw it in gets the approval to do exactly that

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Plus several meetings with the customer to see if there is budget for an upgrade, discuss if they want if brighter, bigger or more efficient, and writing it down in specifications so nobody can say they needed it to be bigger the moment you walk in with the new bulb. Also maybe schedule a few demo lighting sessions to get everyone up to speed and a bit of training for the light switch operator to handle this new responsibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I don't remember, that was a long time ago, but I think the answer must have been B., considering the rest of the game.

    Yes, I played the game in 1987.

    Yes, I'm old.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    My uncle had it on his computer. I redid that quiz a bunch of times because the older you seemed, the more of the first lady's pixels were visible! I remember there being at least 50 pixels ...

    My favorite question was " what happened at the bay of pigs" the correct answer was "a big mistake"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago

    How many programmers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    a. None, it's a hardware problem.

    b. None, programmers can't fit in light bulbs.

    c. 100. One to hold the bulb and 99 to debug the house.

    d. None so far, but they'll get to it Real Soon Now.

    All answers are correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    1, but it takes 12 hours because of the amount of documentation they need to do

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    My favourite light bulb joke is:

    How many Morriseys does it take to change a light bulb? None, because there is a light and it never goes out.

    Every other light bulb joke i hear, the number is arbitrary - it could be 10/100/1000 with no loss to the joke. But "none" and for that reason is the only possible correct answer to that joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Do not worry. Alt-X bypasses the question.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Which is unnecessary for this particular one, since it's one of the ones where all of the answers are considered correct 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Possible plot twist: there is no correct answer and to pass this age check you should skip this one.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I blame management for the existence of option d

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    e. All of the above

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I remember having a lot of trouble with those questions - not so much because I was underage, but because I didn’t grow up with US pop culture and sports.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    3, one product manager, one scrum master and one programmer.

  • source