all 93 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 156 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Modern" UI design be like: fat paddings everywhere

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    the edits to charlie kirk's face are so subtle these days, I can't tell if this is the original or has been slightly modified.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It had been so long since I'd seen his real face that I didn't know how it actually looked like anymore. I saw a clip of him a few days ago and thought 'oh, they aren't changing it that much'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    don't you just fucking love Β 
    Β 
    Β 
    Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β paddings! Β 
    Β 
    Β 

    (apologies to everyone whose device can't render HTML entities)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    i was going to ask what it was supposed to look like, then i opened a reply text and all i see is  

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    The above comment with gratuitous empty spaces around "paddings!"

    Unfortunately, beyond the standard Markdown elements, there is zero feature parity between various front-ends and their Markdown renderers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    Proper GTK4 adwaita apps don't do that. They scale really well on mobiles to desktops.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 66 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    Counterargument:

    Admittedly this is a chat app, so there's little to do. But still, it could stretch out a little bit more, maybe open the conversation info panel on the right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That looks like it's just wrapping a WebView, is it not?

    It looks like the CSS is just capping the container class width at 1440px, which has nothing to do with GTK

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Fair - point still stands though - the application only has a single breakpoint defined at 600sp from a cursory glance, the lack of an ultra-wide specific layout is just because it hasn't been implemented rather than a shortfall of GTK (though I'm not sure you would even want to make the message view wider, as it would impair readability)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do you want the text to span unlimited pixels?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    What is your monitor size?

    (Edit)

    You see the app's font size is on par with the text size of your KDE panel. If gnome increased it, it would look totally out of place.

    Also centering content is a valid design choice. Many websites do that on large/wide monitors. It improves readability. An example might be the design of pi-hole's UI.

    If readability is your issue on gnome on wide screen monitors you should also have issue on reading the time and date on the KDE panel as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    (after edit)

    I have no issue with the text size, I have an issue with enormous empty space around the text. It's fine if it's not perfect on a 21:9 display, but this wouldn't look good even on a 16:9 display.

    I'm also fine with the text not taking up the entire width, I aggre that it's less readable. But I think the window (not the text, the window) could utilise the width better.

    I say that the messages could be a little more spread out (i.e. my massages could be a little to the right while other's a little to the left) and just like the left sidepanel appears and disappears when the window is too thin, more sidebars could appear to the right when the window is very wide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    These are all design choices though, not technical limitations of the gdk. I'm no expert in it though. Is it possible it's missing the tools that make building those other design features easy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    AFAIK one of these are technical limitations, it's just design choices. But in my experience, the design choices made following the gnome design guidelines tend to make apps with tiny faces

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Damn, did you enlarge Charlie's face for the meme? πŸ˜†

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Gnome apps running on my PC:

    I don't use Gnome

    Bottom text

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    I enjoy using Gnome and don't really encounter any issues in my day to day use

    (pls don't kill me :))

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't like Gnome, but I am glad it works for you. At the end of the day Gnome is better than Windows, Mac, and CDE.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    CDE? First time hearing of this. Off to google. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago*

    I don't like using GNOME desktop or apps, but that's not because its bad or less capable for my usage. I just don't prefer their design philosophies. I'm grateful that it exists nonetheless. Linux desktop users are spoiled by how many great choices we have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I used to be a GNOME fanatic a couple of years ago. I switched to KDE after I got tired of the perpetually broken state of extensions.

    I’m still thankful for all the effort and commitment the GNOME devs have invested over the years though! It’s an excellent desktop environment!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I went the opposite way. Wanted to like KDE, but found it too buggy and a bit inconsistent.

    On Gnome I use really minimal extensions and those get updated very quickly so it is no longer an issue for me. I also do Gnome Extension reviews so take from that what you will

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I think what drove me to that decision was the cpufreq extension. It kept breaking with every update. I usually shrugged it off but it really irked me every time.

    My last straw was when they changed the theming system to force the use of libadwaita and broke my customised theme and dark mode. I don’t do a lot of customisation in general but I have rigid preferences when it comes to how I want my system to look and behave. They broke it and that drove me to explore other solutions.

    I tested KDE Plasma for a couple days and I managed to replicate my setup in like 4 hoursβ€”most of which I spent exploring new things that would be impossible to do in GNOME without modifying its code baseβ€”and the end result was an improved setup which was less clunky since I didn’t have to use as many extensions as I did with GNOME to begin with. It was bliss for me.

    I ultimately decided to move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Never got the Mac trend of not using your full screen. I get even less why Gnome copied it.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    My less than 10 minutes per month of MacOS (none of which is actually doing much with it) tells me it's because of the tiny buttons on the wrong (/s) side of the window that feel impossible to press and show an up or down button and you never know which is which.

    I am sure that this is totally the perfect representation of the average macos user and not just me lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    I'm not sure I understand... GTK can use full screens...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    This is what I am referring to. Many macOS people work like this:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I've been forced onto a shit mac book with this stupid OS for the first time in my life and spend 90% of the tine interacting with it basically trying to work around how bad window management and many other things are. Hacks and custom apps and changing options to try to make sense of it. I'm in this hell hole for 2 months now. I still have no idea or feeling for how or when windows behave or if they even become maximized or not. I hate it all.

    The worst offender is opening the system settings and it's a stupid window that can't be maximized in anyway whatsoever and just sits there looking like an horrendous thing being frustrating.

    But after using it I've finally understood where so many bad decisions gnome for example is stealing their ideas from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ok but that's a skills issue on the part of the user, a PEBKAC. Not the fault of the environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Perhaps, but it also hasn't been like that for like a whole ass decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ok, but we're talking about GNOME here and you're saying that somehow GNOME copied Apple on this, but it really isn't the case. GNOME apps pretty much all do go full screen. And the paradigm for over a decade has been this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Never got the Mac trend of not using your full screen. I get even less why Gnome copied it.

    You're right, you personally didn't, but thats the thread we're talking about right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So can OSX for some time now it gives a full screen program it’s own workspace type screen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I actually really like how macOS handled full screen apps, with the windows 8 style side by side and a simple gesture flipping between them like pages in a book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Gnome largely refers to the software suite. gtk is included in the set of libraries anyone can use to make any software. So yes, anyone can use full screens when making software with gtk, but the pre-existing gnome software doesn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Full screen covert thing. What is the point of that, if you have a big screen? macOS started years ago to put full screen apps into their own virtual desktop. Which is often extremely annoying. The only apps I use full screen are IDEs. It does not make any sense for web browsers or office apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Common gnome L

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago*

    Why is Charlie Kirk’s face so big in this?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Time for a scrolling window manager

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Okay so I remember seeing this exact post yesterday. Not that this is stolen, like this exact post. I read some of the comments and chuckled because tiny face Charlie Kirk is funny. I saw a picture of him on a video this morning and never realized that HIS FACE IS ACTUALLY KINDA LIKE THAT WHY IS IT SO SMALL AND CENTERED.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Can somebody tell me how to change that in Mint Cinnamon? I really don't like the padded bar at the top of every window.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I got a mate who started with Linux super recently, I can ask him if he ever figures it out. I'd love to help, but I'm an arch boy and everything with a GUI is unironically more difficult for me, I shit you not lmao (and also don't feel like learning how to manouver Mint either, sorry)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Friends don't let friends use GNOME

    KDE4LYFE

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That's UI design, a dark art mere mortals like you and me won't ever understand.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I don't mean to be pedantic, but why do people shit on DEs? I don't like KDE, but I'll never say an ill word about it. The whole point of Linux and open source in general is that we have choice. If you don't like gnome, that's fine, move along to your interface of choice. Come on, there are better things to argue about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I interpret this being more about how GNOME apps function in general, also on other desktops, which is fair criticism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's never about the DE's themselves, it's about the devs.

    KDE's devs are just focused on making a cool desktop environment with many features. It's a little buggy and has some weird design decisions, but whatever, no biggie.

    GNOME devs deliberately sabbotage existing linux standards in attemps to take control over desktop linux. Examples: client-side decorations, client-side shadows, systray fiasco.

    This is not a question of personal preference. It's a question of keeping desktop linux free, fair, and accessible for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're feeding the fire. Just use what you like and let the other DEs do their thing. You can totally exist without shitting on what other people prefer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Did you even read my comment? This has nothing to do with personal preference. It's a matter of defending a shared commons from a hostile force. Sure, an individual gnome user can coexist with an individual kde user, like seriously who cares its just a DE. But as a community, users of other DEs, WMs and compositors can only "coexist" with the gnome project in the same way that a population of humans can "coexist" with the COVID-19 virus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm having this problem on Android rn. Coming from iOS, the content density is just super low, and no amount of tweaking display/font size will fix it πŸ™

    My screen is 50% padding now πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™€οΈ

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Also, non-GTK non-shitwaita apps on gnome.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Huh, this sort of issue is what made me leave KDE in the first place. Haven't had such problems on gnome.

  • source