It's well worth it if you ask me. The school children can sit in the dark and hot/cold (delete as appropriate) so Bob in Idaho can generate a 30 second video of Yoda dancing to Wannabe in the style of Studio Ghibli, which he will look at once and then never again.
post
We all see this coming, but the billionaires and our state/county/city leaders assure us everything will be fair and fine.
Same deal with water. It will be 100 degrees and data centers will be draining local water supplies, while residents will be told not to water their flowers or take too many showers.
Fuck all this.
I love that their solution is to not use the thing that the data centers are supposed to be for.
People will be sacked for turning up to work smelling of sweat. Such fun times.
It will be 100 degrees and data centers will be draining local water supplies, while residents will be told not to water their flowers or take too many showers.
Wasn't this already the case like 2 years ago in Texas? Except I remember the governor telling people to drink less water and shower together when possible to save water for the data centers.
California: 80% of water use is agricultural and industrial but who do they lean on in drought years? Jimmy fucking John and minute showers. Corporations will not budge without force so state goes after the soft target.
Same play here.
California also has the stupidest water rights with “use it or lose” it clauses that counters any incentives to become more efficient. A couple families control a ridiculous amount of water rights.
The problem is that data centers don't need water, they need cooling, and water is suitable for that because it's the cheapest. They could do the cooling in many other ways, but it costs money
The other ways cost money, make noise, and consume more power.
You mean cost more money. It's not like water is free but it is very cheap to use. But those other ways to cool it cost quite a bit more electricity and aren't nearly as efficient.
That's typically how the government operates as well. No incentive to use funding wisely and decrease spending
So it's official now. AI comes before schools, and before children. Welp. So much for thinking about the children.
The children only matter in election cycles
The perception that children matter only exists in election cycles.
They never really matter.
And on their private islands
The children only matter when they can't speak for themselves.
That way they can't disagree. It's why they put so much emphasis on the unborn. Once they can speak their own opinion, they're worthless.
Why spend all that money and resources cultivating actual intelligence?
Here comes Abbot's elementary comedy series, where they build a big stadium, but they can't afford to fix the lights in the school.
We need Anonymous to do something about data centers.
In Virginia during the fifa World Cup there are a lot of pro data center ads funded by a group that was created for this purpose called Virginia Connects.
It’s the usual shitbags lying to the public to make it sound like data centers are good
Are they in cahoots with the PACs that support pro AI candidates? (Are they the same groups? I really don't know.)
In Virginia ads are still running about not leaving rural Virginians behind by banning data centers. Claiming that they will bring jobs to the rural community but those nasty politicians are banning the progress of data centers.
Please sir...can I have some more....electricity
said the poor school to the billionaires
I guess they could light a data center on fire to keep warm and not run their heaters? Win/win?
(Also I hope it’s very obvious to everyone this is a joke, I’m not trying no to incite or encourage violence in any way at all).
Clearly you were talking about doing this in Minecraft, so its okay.
I'm just amazed at the grotesquely huge amounts of copper they have in those datacenters.
I also hope that data centers "don't" get burnt down. How "un"satisfying would that be. While I'm at it, I hope no one kills the trillionaire.
Killdozer needs to come back...
Are they keeping profits from data centres away from schools?
Educating the kids would be a waste of taxpayer dollars. The only training they need is how to mow the grass around the data centres.
But also, don't forget to teach AI and use AI in your school!
https://www.vaco.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/HenricoGenerativeAIPreparingForDigitalAge.pdf
I never understood why we’re supposed to need to be ‘taught’ how to use AI if it’s so good at natural language processing. If the reference desk librarian can understand it and give you what you actually want (not necessarily the exact thing you’re asking for), so should anything being touted as AI.
I least they got all that money and jobs (right? I'm pretty sure Facebook skirted that actually)
County with 37 datacenters can go fuck itself with a cactus.
here come the brownouts motherfuckers...
An interesting one there, how can schools consumption be compared to that of Data centers
No. Next fucking question. I'd rather data centers have brown-outs than schools.
Here's an archive link for the few who actually want to read the article.
How does closing the blinds conserve electricity? O_o
Less AC needed.
Oh that's right, y'all got AC back there. I forgor.
I know Europe is scant on AC in general, but you guys really don't even use it in schools? That seems wild to me.
No AC in schools. School is out in the summer in general.
May June and September don't have the capability to have hot days in Europe? In 2010 only the newer part of my highschool had AC, but now I believe the whole building does.
We prefer to stick our fingers in our ears, pretend climate change isn't getting worse and torture our kids and teachers instead. At least after the recent heatwave some conversations are starting to happen.
In southern Europe, yes. In northern Europe, generally no need for AC. Remember that Europe is not one country.
There are a lot of places in the US that don't have AC in schools. The number of days that it would be used just don't happen during the school year enough to justify it.
Most buildings don't have them. Why would schools be any different? Our secondary school was culturally protected so even if they wanted to install one they probably could not. And the only time heat was an issue was during covid when we got assigned the attic classroom. All the other rooms were alright.
Won't need ac when we're all forced to live underground in a few years. Hello fellow mole people
I wonder if there's any chance of all the tech speculation helping to fund electrical grid upgrades (including grid scale storage for renewables) that actually benefit regular human society after the bubble pops.
Close to zero unless forced. The question is who will do the forcing?
Seems unlikely unless the bubble survives another 5+ years. My guess is power companies are taking AI contracts and cash now, promising to add capacity later, and then when the bubble pops they will shrug, say no more capacity is needed, and give the CEOs a huge bonus.
Putting the accountability on SCHOOLS of all things is absurd. Even ignoring data centers, I can assure you there are other facilities that use more power than schools and provide less to the people
The local government doesn't pay for the data centers electricity though, at least not directly. This is their rate going up so they ask their public facilities to save energy. It's a reasonable response from them, but they should have prevented it by not allowing so many data centers.
Yeah but public schools are notorious for being insanely rich!
Schools simply don't seem like a big consumer of electricity other than just normal stuff that any building will use (e.g. lights and HVAC).
plus schools dont even use power during summer or winter months, since theres no classes in session. excluding summer courses.
These data centers should be charged enough that there's no increase for anyone else in the area. They contribute nothing to the community. The only benefit that can be extracted from them locally is to charge and tax the absolute fuck out of the companies building them in every possible way.
Contribute nothing to the community? Are you crazy? They use lots of water. They make a lot of noise. They are typically eyesores. That's a contribution.
Of sorts.
Those things would be subtractions from the community.
especially if have 37 very close to each other.
they contribute higher gas,electiric, water cost to the community, and pollution.
Nah, they should be forced to stop operation until they build renewable power plans that produce 2x the energy that they consume in one day.
They should benefit the community, not just be a net 0.
How about just disconnecting the data centers from the grid? Or make them pay the extra cost?
No, won't happen, because that would be the smart and sensible way. And that's not the way the politicians are bribed for.
I think the term is Natural Monopoly.
When there’s no reason to run a second set of extremely expensive infrastructure to people’s homes, it needs government oversight. That government oversight should have established a median electricity usage level for businesses and residences, and applied pricing accordingly - with tiers based on usage levels. Every 1000kwh, the price goes up. Small houses get electricity effectively for cost of delivery, while data centres pay for what they use and more.
But then the data centres might be in another county and we couldn’t lose the 2 full time jobs!



all 4 comments