Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology are being sued by seventeen plaintiffs in the California Northern District Court, who allege that the three tech manufacturers are colluding to artificially increase the price of RAM.

Seventeen individual plaintiffs, including three small businesses, have launched a class action lawsuit in the Northern District of California against the three largest RAM and chip manufacturers in the world: Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology. The plaintiffs allege that the three tech companies are colluding to raise the prices of RAM by keeping supplies artificially low, blaming it all on an AI data center-driven “RAMpocalypse” rather than corporate policy.

The Garciaguirre et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al case was filed earlier this week, on June 25, in the California Northern District Court, and lists three small computer retailers, Troy’s Computers LLC, JB Tech Solutions LLC, and WNTD Fab LLC, among its seventeen plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs claim that Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology are essentially part of a cartel that is collaborating to inflate DRAM and chip prices by controlling the overwhelming majority of the market. While proving that will obviously be a lot harder than alleging it, it’s no secret that the three companies own roughly 90 percent of the DRAM market.

And it’s no secret that Samsung and SK Hynix have been previously indicted for doing exactly what the plaintiffs are accusing them of doing now. In 2005, two Samsung executives and one Hynix America executive were indicted by a San Francisco jury for DRAM price-fixing and “bid-rigging.”

Bid-rigging can take many forms, but in this example, Samsung and Hynix America were accused of “issuing price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached” during private meetings, and “agreeing during those meetings and telephone conversations to charge prices of DRAM at certain levels to be sold to certain [original equipment manufacturers]” in the United States.

more links: https://wccftech.com/memory-trio-samsung-sk-hynix-micron-face-class-action-lawsuit/

top 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 187 points 4 months ago (22 children)

I mean, yeah, of course they are. With that said, they would be absolutely stupid to do so explicitly. If they actually find evidence during discovery, that just means management is dumb as rocks. So... They might.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 119 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    They've been caught before, which would make getting caught a second time even more embarrassing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And me, without any knowledge of this story, I'm going to weigh in with a hunch.

    I haven't read the story. I never heard of the previous story. I read your comment, and thats it.

    So.....here's my hunch.

    They were caught doing this before, weren't given any REAL reprocussions. Nothing that would discourage them from keeping at it. They never stopped price fixing, and they just write off any fines for getting caught as the price of doing business.

    So. How'd I do? Did I get it 100% right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago

    They were caught doing this before, weren't given any REAL reprocussions.

    Hey wait, but some executives were jailed the first time. They're out now of course. And the penalties were a small fraction of the profits. And they're now working at different but similar companies in executive positions again.

    But they totally learned their lessons. Totally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Well hold on now.

    That's basically exactly what happened during the RAM cartel of the early 2000's. I think one guy went to jail for like 6 months, but other than that, yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    they would be absolutely stupid to do so explicitly

    It's not stupid to do things that easy way when you know you won't get punished

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Yes, but I meant that you could get the same results without DMing your buddy "wanna do a crime?"

    ... Though this frequently happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Nobody chasing "AI" as hard as they are isn't at least as dumb as rocks at a minimum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    To be fair, they aren’t chasing ai as much as selling hardware to the people who are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Gambling, you say?!

    In the casino?!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 4 months ago

    The only way this succeeds if is Micron betrays the other two like last time and makes a better desl for themselves in exchange for being a snitch.

    Otherwise they won't be able to gather enough evidence for a quick trial and this will last close to a decade before each company agrees to some penny handouts.

    Unless they're really dumb and didn't learn to hide their collusion from the last time they did this.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    50¢ off your next RAM purchase and a free credit check.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I signed up for some Facebook class action settlement. A couple months ago I received an e-giftcard for like $50.

    Then a week or so ago I got notification "additional funds have been allocated"...$5.09!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Years back the company I work for ended bankruptcy and I never got my final paycheck occasionally they'll contact me to give me bits and bobs of what they owe me. At this rate I should receive my final month's paycheck in full within no less than 80 years.

    Jokes on there might since I stole all the pick n' mix cups and sold them on eBay for more than my paycheck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Judge checks notes: hmmm no, actually it's just capitalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    "Oh no, we're gonna get fined a hundred million for the extra couple-hundred-billion we made by price fixing & collusion. Oh nooooo... 💸"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yep.

    When fines are nothing but a fraction of a fraction of the money made, then it ceases to be a fine, and just becomes an evil tax.

    Which is why businesses should face fines based on their income, starting at 50% of yearly earnings, and going up to at least 300% of their yearly earnings.

    Bad behavior won't change until you threaten their profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Weirdly enough, business would advance or develope if there wasn't something to be gained. Or funded, and you need an excess of liquid cash to fund new things.

    It is a weird cycle, and I agree not good. It is just weird how intertwined it all is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah I'm guessing nothing will come of this, no one important will face any consequences and these companies will go on making lots of profits after paying a little slap on the wrist fine / cost of doing business that is a fraction of the profit they made while breaking the law

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    I mean, Micron for sure did, when they "exited consumer RAM to focus on data centers" at a point where overall RAM was at peak demand. That's a supreme intent to create artificial scarcity.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Can't they just buy some trumpcoin and make this all go away ?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    I'm glad to see it. Wouldn't be the first time they colluded.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    I just assume Samsung does shady stuff now. Once a decent company is just as bad as the rest or worse.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    lol. To the surprise of no one. If Nvidia/apple/major customers sued, maybe we’d see actual price drops

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Their profit margins already prove it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    @ekZepp I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you! 🙄

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    @ekZepp Can do the same to every other manufacturer using the many excuses they had from world/domestic events that led to billions in record profits.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    don't worry every1 hehe theyll slide some checks praise the orange stain a little and itll be just fine for the shareholders

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago