all 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I could download SO MANY LINUX ISOS!!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    Steam is the only service that actually maxes out my gigabit connection

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    maxes out my gigabit connection

    Euphemism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Oh boy, this is going to really take me to the next level in Balatro

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Why would internet speed affect your play of Balatro?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    To add at least one on-topic comment here:

    the team achieved 51.3Tb/s transmission over a single 206.5-km unrepeatered span using only erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) amplification

    This is impressive! Our usual spans go to maybe 120 km at most if I use our strongest EDFAs. With those we can deal with around 30 dB of span loss, and most fibers we can rent have around 0.25 dB/km loss. Of course this is on classical single core fiber, we don't use HCF yet.

    I remember YOFC was also at last year's ECOC, where they presented their support tube hollow core fiber concept, reaching 0.05 dB/km at some wavelengths. Here's some slides I photographed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I watched those pictures load one row of pixels at a time for 2 minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 4 months ago (18 children)

    I've stopped caring what the capacity is. Youtube doesn't require a fraction of what we have already in place.

    However, they've put so many ads that an adblock is required.

    But, if you have adblock you need to click the video you need to watch, let it not load, refresh the screen, wait way longer than should be needed, and then watch the video while getting a nagging popup that says "Experiencing interuptions?"

    Followed by watching the video rendering NOT rendering at various points, and you need to pause and let it buffer.

    All because google thinks they are entitled to push malicious ads onto my device, and punishing me for blocking them.

    The speed we have is more than enough for the internet we have. The bottleneck is the companies enshittifying their own service.

    Faster speeds mean nothing when you artificially throttle them.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I can see you don't regularly have to upload terabytes of data every day. A faster connection would literally change my work life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Can't detect if serious.

    Last time I needed a > 1TB dataset they sent it in the snail mail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not sure what is the snail mail, but yes; serious. It's mostly simulations data. I can easily produce 100 TB/GPU*day. I have access to some 500 GPUs. Data can not stay where it is produced in order to free up space for more to be produced and must be shuffled around to be processed, thus the importance of a fast internet connection. Sometimes I need to get part of this data on my local computer, process it and upload it somewhere else, it can be terribly slow on a normal 1 GB/s connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Snail mail is traditional mail, in this case presumably sending a physical data storage device for those terabytes of data, which could maybe be faster and more reliable than networking it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You could, you know, just not use YouTube. Like, no one is forcing you to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Uhm.. This really doesn't affect your capacity. This is about data center connections and optimization of intercontinental networks. They're not going to be running this line to your neighborhood in the next 100 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Look, I'm no fan of ads, but... It's a free service that costs an ungodly amount of money to run. They've gotta make money somehow.

    Of course the whole running it at a loss for a decade thing means they had to go the enshittification route. Could've had more ads and a subscription option long ago but they wanted to lull us into a false sense of security first :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I honestly don't know what people here on Lemmy want them to do. If you don't want ads then you can pay the subscription.

    You can't expect the largest video platform to be free and without ads, they have to pay to host all of the videos somehow.

    If anyone has a serious alternative to ads or subscription while still being able to pay for the hosting then maybe start your own service and use that as the USP?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    This isn’t for you or me. It’s for their AIs to link globally.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    Just for context, this technology is not made for any specific end-consumer. This is for backbone connections of ISP and higher tier networks.

    In that space, 400Gb/s is the current stuff that's being rolled out with 800Gb/s starting to get traction. 1.2Tb is just the next step to reduce the amount of Fibers and Ports used per connection (renting fibers of an undersea cable is expensive).

    Though one issue I see slowing adoption is that new fibers are needed. With coherent optics we already achieve 800G with the same single mode fibers already in use.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    That's apparently how BSD handles network outages.

    Image of a tractor-trailer with B.S.D. Linehaul branding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Why, so Zuck can stream back 8k footage of my bootyhole every time I take a shit?!

    Right now I'm happy if I'm getting my advertised gig up and down. Any extra bandwidth would just be used by advertisers/spies to exfiltrate more data about me

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Used to make cable filler for a living. A lot of what I made ened up in lines for google and under the ocean. It's a dirty business. We're gonna kill the planet for all this.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    You'll never get this kind of result in the real world though because no matter how good the fibre optic is it's inevitably going to travel through a router with a chip made by the lowest bidder.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    oh yes, more slop per second

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

    In b4.
    Now that does it! I've simply had enough of China stealing our technology.
    They've been doing it for decades, but now they are stealing our technologies before we have them ourselves!! 😡
    The worst thing is I now have to hear about how this was never invented in China anyway, and without the west 1.4 billion Chinese people could never have invented anything, because they are too stupid.
    /s

    EDIT PS: For some reason OP edited the headline to be WRONG.
    The correct headline is:

    China: Researchers transmit a whooping 51.3Tb/s through an optical fiber channel

    1.2 Tb/s is per wavelength, which is normal to have multiple of. And has been tested up to 51.3Tb/s over a distance of roughly 128 miles.

    Edit PS:
    Yes I know China has "stolen" technology, so has all developed countries in the world.
    Especially USA was built on technologies "stolen" from Europe. So give it a rest already.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    now they are stealing our technologies before we have them ourselves!!

    I remember when "Chinese students can't come up with anything new because they're too indoctrinated by Communist authoritarianism" was a thing normal people genuinely believed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Yes I've seen something in that line of thinking as well. But even if China has schools that are not top notch, they have sent students to other countries to learn for about 50 years. And their own top schools are among the best in the world now.

    https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings

    #11 in Hong Kong and #13 in Peking.
    IDK if the list is entirely fair, I imagine having a good and long track record could have an influence.
    China has been investing heavily in research and education, several times more than what we do in Europe and USA.
    So it's no wonder they are catching up, and even passing us now.

    Funny to see how we both got a downvote? 😋🤣
    Maybe someone still believing in the superiority of the west, which clearly we don't have a monopoly on anymore, China has caught up, exactly as Japan and Korea have done before China.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    you were probably downvoted because it's completely unnecessary and off topic. no one was going to bring this up but you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    OK admittedly it's not really relevant, it was merely a joke.
    But you can't honestly claim to not have seen those moronic posts about how China never invents anything and only steal their technologies from the west.
    They are so common it's insanely tiresome. In this thread there are none, maybe because in this case China obviously developed and invented it themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe someone still believing in the superiority of the west, which clearly we don’t have a monopoly on anymore, China has caught up, exactly as Japan and Korea have done before China.

    I genuinely is curious to see the exact same propaganda rolled out against China that Americans deployed against the other Eastern Rim industrial states. India is, similarly, getting a ton of this treatment.

    The big difference between China and India/Japan/Korea is the failure of the Chinese government to placidly ingest western neoliberal economic policy and stagnate their economies for a decade as a result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Absolutely, China being communist makes them the enemy.
    But to be fair, capitalism is also a declared enemy to communist countries.
    Both are equally wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    capitalism is also a declared enemy to communist countries

    Colonialism tends to be the explicit professed enemy. Communism, as a practical economic policy, revolves around securing domestic resources for the benefit of the local public. China's managed this phenomenally.

    What Chinese policymakers object to is extraction of Chinese surplus at a loss. And foreign capitalists hate this, because it cuts into their profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Does anyone know what the previous record was?

  • source