you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 4 months ago (18 children)

I've stopped caring what the capacity is. Youtube doesn't require a fraction of what we have already in place.

However, they've put so many ads that an adblock is required.

But, if you have adblock you need to click the video you need to watch, let it not load, refresh the screen, wait way longer than should be needed, and then watch the video while getting a nagging popup that says "Experiencing interuptions?"

Followed by watching the video rendering NOT rendering at various points, and you need to pause and let it buffer.

All because google thinks they are entitled to push malicious ads onto my device, and punishing me for blocking them.

The speed we have is more than enough for the internet we have. The bottleneck is the companies enshittifying their own service.

Faster speeds mean nothing when you artificially throttle them.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I can see you don't regularly have to upload terabytes of data every day. A faster connection would literally change my work life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Can't detect if serious.

    Last time I needed a > 1TB dataset they sent it in the snail mail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not sure what is the snail mail, but yes; serious. It's mostly simulations data. I can easily produce 100 TB/GPU*day. I have access to some 500 GPUs. Data can not stay where it is produced in order to free up space for more to be produced and must be shuffled around to be processed, thus the importance of a fast internet connection. Sometimes I need to get part of this data on my local computer, process it and upload it somewhere else, it can be terribly slow on a normal 1 GB/s connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Snail mail is traditional mail, in this case presumably sending a physical data storage device for those terabytes of data, which could maybe be faster and more reliable than networking it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You could, you know, just not use YouTube. Like, no one is forcing you to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Uhm.. This really doesn't affect your capacity. This is about data center connections and optimization of intercontinental networks. They're not going to be running this line to your neighborhood in the next 100 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Look, I'm no fan of ads, but... It's a free service that costs an ungodly amount of money to run. They've gotta make money somehow.

    Of course the whole running it at a loss for a decade thing means they had to go the enshittification route. Could've had more ads and a subscription option long ago but they wanted to lull us into a false sense of security first :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I honestly don't know what people here on Lemmy want them to do. If you don't want ads then you can pay the subscription.

    You can't expect the largest video platform to be free and without ads, they have to pay to host all of the videos somehow.

    If anyone has a serious alternative to ads or subscription while still being able to pay for the hosting then maybe start your own service and use that as the USP?

  • source
  • parent