you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 77 points 1 year ago (15 children)

They're already charging way more than that when you count all the DLC.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Yeah, wasn't sims 4 with all dlc like 1 grand just a couple yeara ago?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t understand looking at Sims 4 as an example. The game has had progressive additions for a long time; it’s basically a live service game, and now comes free.

    It’s rare for anyone to feel they want all the DLC - usually it would just be a few things they want and have fun with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    True, but iirc sims 4 also released in a more cut-down state than sims 3 - in fact it was one of the pioneers of "paradoxification" of games and victim of other bullshit that EA was trying to pull, just like with simcity.

    Anyway, my point was that with EA the up-front price they charge is not awfully relevant, because you have lootboxes, p2w, mtx, gambling, dlc of varying dollar value etc. so you might end up paying a crapload, live service or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The base price increase would still raise the total with DLC. Not including the DLC is still worth talking about, since there are plenty of ways to enjoy a game without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    well DLC has always cost money on top of the base game so i’m not sure what your point is.

    edit:

    you're ignoring that if you buy all DLCs you get much more content compared to old $60 games. If you want to look at this fairly you need to come up with some way of quantifying the content involved which is not easy to do.

    I do agree that some DLCs are clearly designed as money grabs (like most premium/gold launch editions). But i disagree with lumping all DLC into that category, especially bigger expansions that release a year or more later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That the game is broken up into parts to charge more instead of, you know, making the game feature-rich in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    do you not agree most games ARE feature rich in the first place? I mean compared to old $60 games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The ones by big publishers? No, they're feature complete at best for the sake of the game loop but sell the rest in overpriced DLCs. The base game is the hook, that's why Epic keeps giving some away for free or are sold at a heavy discount on Steam. You only need to scroll down to notice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment