The Haters have arrived
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 162 points 5 days ago (96 children)

With the way they're acting, you'd think that these dudes wanted Republicans to maintain control. Like, I don't have a lot of faith in democrats to actually get the shit done that they need to, but the defeatism is absolutely absurd.

  • source
  • hideshow 96 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    You'd think that but have a look at hexbear's midterms containment thread. The way they speak about it internally is different. They are very happy the Republicans lost, they jsut don't care that it's the democrats who won.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 5 days ago (14 children)

    I swear to god the double trauma of COVID and Trump during formative periods of some peoples’ lives made it pathologically impossible for them to take a win for even a day or two. That’s how you burn the fuck out. Don’t rest on your laurels, but making people feel like nothing is ever enough is how you get them to stop showing up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (11 children)

    We have plenty of wins, built on the hard work of working class Americans door knocking, phone banking, canvassing, signature gathering, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 days ago (10 children)

    I've always been a fan of the color red. Imagine if (let me dream) the republican party falls and the DSA can take red as their color against the establishment dems' blue. Fighting on the red side would feel good then!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Gonna need like 50 years to wash the stank off that color. Every time I see a red baseball cap I get alarmed and concerned about a very untrustworthy person I should avoid. Usually it's just a sports team hat but it never fails to raise my blood pressure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Mario cosplayers in shambles right now!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 5 days ago

    I see it a lot in organizing, like taking even a second to breathe is going to accidentally infect you with an airborne centrist virus.

    And then the going gets rough and all the "We can rest after the revolution" types are burnt out so they start publicly infighting at the first disagreement because they're tired and hopeless and miserable.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    As a Canadian, I'm seeing too many people thinking everything can now immediately go back to "normal". None of the actual work has started yet.

    Yes, absolutely celebrate this, but if you act like things are "over" you need a reality check. Americans voted against Trump in 2020, and then elected him again after seeing what he did the first time.

    So yes, this is absolutely a great first step, but it needs to be followed with criminals being held accountable and Americans not voting the other way again in 2 or 4 years. Considering Democratic leaders are already talking about not holding criminals accountable it seems prudent to splash some water on people acting like this is over and they can stop pushing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    I was spending my time volunteering for Democrats campaigns, and I’m still barely enthused with the result.

    It’s a very small step forward in a possibility of a government that works for its people. But anyone smart on here knows that goes much more fine-grained than the color maps.

    (Red is obvious. But blue? Blue is still many shades of gray)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    They probably wanted progressive wing to collapse before getting back in the seat. Now people have a reference point to compare them to and hopefully democrats that can't live up to that will get rooted out instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago (8 children)

    I’m old enough to remember Blue Waves hitting the rocks of Decorum and Civility and doing fuck all. I’m not getting my hopes up ever again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

    If I keep these thoughts inside they’ll take me to the grippy sock hotel.

    Plus you know me. You know this isn’t my best. I’m sorry to disappoint but I’ve been dealing with the bullshit that happens no matter who got elected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 5 days ago (10 children)

    As "one of those people" you are talking about, we've been here before. Yes, it feels awesome to get such a decisive victory over the republicans. I've seen this before. Over and over again. The pendulum has swung back to the left. But, just because we voted in a bunch of Dems, hell even a bunch of Socialists, that doesn't mean they will, or even can, fix the most broken parts of this system. Democrats have enabled and even facilitated some of the worst aspects of what we're seeing right now from Trump and Republicans. I mean, you yourself even admit it: "I don’t have a lot of faith in democrats to actually get the shit done that they need to".

    The difference is, we know what needs to be done. A really famous guy wrote about it over a 100 years ago. Having Blue majority didn't improve anybody's material conditions in the past. Why would it now? Yes, they're "less bad", but Dems are still pretty bad. What makes this time different?

    I love the outcome of the election. It was a bloodbath. But I'm not deluding myself that wholesale change will ever come from national electeds. Defeatist? Maybe. I'm just tempering my expectations, even from DSA endorsed winners.

    this post sums it up best imo. Prove me wrong. Prove all of us MLs and "tAnKiEs" wrong. Prove to us that voting can and does work, that we can materially improve people's situations without protest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    Don’t get me wrong, I see what you’re saying and I generally agree with your leftist sentiments.

    That said, you are incorrect that the Democrats have been totally unsuccessful in improving material conditions for people. I’m with you that it hasn’t nearly been far enough, but they did accomplish significant things for women and black people.

    JFK passed the equal pay act. LBJ passed the civil rights act. Clinton passed the violence against women act. These things had an effect that was tangible, even if we need more.

    In Texas, my grandmother wasn’t able to have her own bank account without my grandfather signing a permission note until John Connally, a Democrat, passed the Marital Property Act of 1967. My mother never had that problem because a Democrat changed the conditions for women in this country.

    Do I want a true left to rise in the United States? Yes. Do I think the Democrats have any hope of fixing capitalism? No. BUT, this victory is sweet, and I’ll be raising a glass to the Democrats today anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Respectfully, stand down, comrade! I’m on your side and not becoming a Kamala brunch enthusiast. I appreciate your opinions on history and thank you for sharing your thoughts.

    The fight definitely continues, but a little win feels nice. I can go back to my usual full on class warfare in the morning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    The conversation I was responding to was comparing Republicans vs. Democrats. Someone was trying to make it seem they're the same. I was just offering a counterpoint.

    yes, broadly dems fight for lgbtq ... when it's beneficial to them. For most Dems, lgbtq rights are just a bargaining chip

    As opposed to Republicans, which actively oppose any LGBTQ rights. They are nowhere near the same.

    not embedded into the platform as it is for DSA

    As far as I'm aware there is no official DSA party (correct me if I'm wrong), the DSA aligned candidates usually run as a Democrat. Have any ever ran as a Republican?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 5 days ago (29 children)

    The tankies want Trump to win because they think that after he's destroyed the US, a socialist utopia will rise from the ashes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    A theocratic autocracy will rise from the ashes. Unless you kids have done more prep work that you let on, your not winning the war if it goes hot, and the crazies with stockpiles and organization in place have the advantage over unprepared forum users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    I've seen a lot of hysteria around "tankies" since I started using Lemmy and I gotta say I really don't get it. Yes, there are people here who are to the left of Democrats. No, that doesn't make them the enemy, or secretly MAGA or Russian or whatever. They just... disagree with liberals. I see opinions attributed to "everyone from a .ml community" that I've never seen from any of the actual users. People gleefully brag about blocking swaths of other users, yet I've almost never seen any .ml user actually being as toxic as they get branded. I'm pretty sure I've even heard people say that you are a particularly bad one, but I haven't witnessed it.

    Also, lemmy was created by ml's right? It's one thing to have very little tolerance for different political opinions, but it's another thing entirely to literally just be the gray characters from this meme and still somehow think you're in the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    I’ve seen a lot of hysteria around “tankies” since I started using Lemmy and I gotta say I really don’t get it

    I used to think this but then discovered that most of the actual tankies are blocked by my instance.

    By contrast I pointed my browser to lemmy.ml just now and the front page includes a celebration of "Russia Unity Day", a reading group for "Soviet Democracy", and three "good news only" type puff pieces about China. There's definitely a solid bloc of propagandists out there.

    As others have said, they want to run that kind of instance I don't actually have any huge beef with it. To an extent I think it's good to have some other perspectives and news sources. Just be aware that that's who people are talking about when they talk about "tankies", not the people who post stuff critical of the Democratic Party.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago*

    People should run their lemmy instance as they want.

    The non stop feudposting about what people do in their own instance is ridiculous. Block the instance and move on with your life if you need to. Block me to while youre at it! Who cares?

    It seems there is some other agenda at play with those who are on this dumb ass crusade against .ml

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I think people generally think of themselves as progressive when they come here, and it might be their first run-in with revolutionary socialists. They get caught between their progressive beliefs, largely around the Bernie/AOC area, and this suddenly new group (to them) of people that despise reformism and the Democrats almost as much as the Republicans. It creates a lot of friction, IMO. And yea, Lemmy was and is made by MLs, which means we have a permanent foothold here.

    Have you tried browsing hexbear.net and Lemmygrad.ml? Lemmy.ml has its own vibe because we don't really defederate from anyone, but Lemmygrad.ml and Hexbear.net are pretty good examples of what "tankies" are like when we aren't getting into constant squabbles with liberals. You'll see tons of queer people, a lot of passionate people, and a lot of normalcy, to be honest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (13 children)

    I'm not going to lie, as an outsider this always seems to be the case. Could you explain what you actually want and what you could see realistically happening if the fascists won?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    Fascism is when the capitalist class oversteps the legal boundaries and restricts the civil rights of the country, when bourgeois democracy is replaced with outright direct rule by capital.

    Seems like democrats getting elected does help alleviate fascism then?

    Also, what do you mean by "fighting it directly"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    Democrats getting elected doesn't alleviate the risk of fascism, because as I said, it's the capitalist class overstepping the legal boundaries. Democrats can legislate all they want against fascism (which they won't do, let's be honest), but the point is that capital does not care what is legal, and holds the actual power in society by owning the commanding heights of the economy. It can directly implement fascism without the consent of the DNC.

    As for fighting it directly, a socialist revolution prevents the risk of fascism by taking the commanding heights from the capitalist class. In the case of fascism, socialist revolution is what can end it most effectively. In either case, armed struggle is almost certainly necessary, but it's far cleaner before fascism actually is implemented than after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    I think you're still not getting how fascism works. The party in power makes absolutely no difference on whether or not fascism is implemented, and the drive for fascism is related to the ability for the capitalist class to continue to effectively control the population, which decreases in times of economic duress, and which is necessarily a ticking clock in capitalism as it is unsustainable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    Republicans and Democrats do not control the media. Capitalists do, and capitalists also control the Republicans and Democrats. You are confusing state repression under capitalism with fascism itself. Capitalism is a brutal system all on its own, and would prefer to keep the bourgeois democratic shell as it's the most stable and effective at maintaining their control. Capitalists rip off the mask of bourgeois democracy whenever their rule is in actual danger, regardless of the party in power, regardless of how legal or illegal it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    The same goes to you, I suppose. If you don't see that the Democrats are just as bought and owned by different capitalists, then I'm not going to be able to convince you on Lemmy comments, most likely. Would require a combination of history and Marxist theory. Mind you, it's mostly different capitalists, but capitalists all the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    With the way they're acting, you'd think that these dudes wanted Republicans to maintain control.

    Oh believe me, they do. I've literally been told how much more awful Democrats are than Republicans. IIRC, the reasoning behind that was some vague shit about liberals watering down true leftism or something. Like, yeah, one side wants to establish a fascist totalitarian government and has literally set out to murdering foreigners and dissenters with ICE, but hey, your identity politics are more important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (15 children)

    They’ll tell you that they do. I’ve had some tell me that electoralism won’t bring about socialism and things have to get way worse before the people revolt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)