[–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

The conversation I was responding to was comparing Republicans vs. Democrats. Someone was trying to make it seem they're the same. I was just offering a counterpoint.

yes, broadly dems fight for lgbtq ... when it's beneficial to them. For most Dems, lgbtq rights are just a bargaining chip

As opposed to Republicans, which actively oppose any LGBTQ rights. They are nowhere near the same.

not embedded into the platform as it is for DSA

As far as I'm aware there is no official DSA party (correct me if I'm wrong), the DSA aligned candidates usually run as a Democrat. Have any ever ran as a Republican?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    The Democrats fought for same sex marriage when the Republicans have always been anti-LGBTQ. Republicans spent so much money on ads that lied about us wanting to marry animals, etc. and the Democrats were still able to push it through.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/c/unitedkingdom/p/1159289/greens-suspends-trans-woman-due-to-running-for-a-woman-s-space-on-party-council

    https://bsky.app/profile/leftiestats.bsky.social/post/3muwxjieu7k2j

    Sorry only news sources reporting this is the Daily Mail and Telegraph, not worth linking to their thoughts on trans women.

    Of note is that Eleanora was elected to the spot and backed by 'Greens for Palestine' . 2 Weeks later she is out on transphobic grounds and seems to have her suspension leaked to the Daily Mail potentially by someone in the Greens.

    Xitter conversation between Greens Party Council and Eleanora
    image

    image

    image

    Greens Party Council member Kai Taylor has put the Greens party into disrepute.

     

    Ideally, the U.S. public is supposed to be able to comment on government policy proceedings, and the government is supposed to listen to that input.

    Of course, it doesn’t really work that way: For years we’ve noted how U.S. regulatory comment proceedings are full of bots and fake comments from industries trying to game regulators, and make shitty policy (giant mergers, mindless deregulation, the elimination of consumer protection) seem like it has broad public support (remember when dead people opposed net neutrality?).

    Unsurprisingly the U.S. hasn’t done anything to seriously rein in this problem. And when officials do act, it tends to be largely toothless, resulting in the problem getting steadily worse.

    And that was before AI made it significantly easier for bad actors to quickly automate this sort of gamesmanship. Washington State has been exploring the RADICAL SOCIALIST ANTIFA EXTREMIST idea of having the state’s rich actually pay their taxes. That’s not been received particularly well by the extraction class, which has been making empty promises about leaving the state.

    We later get this tidbit:

    “More than 60,000 people signed in against SB 6346 when it received a rushed hearing in the Senate,” Sen. John Braun, R-Centralia, said in a Feb. 16 statement. “That is so impressive that Democrats have tried to say bots are responsible, even though the Legislature blocks bots.”

    Centralia? That's the equivalent of flyover country along I-5. (I have driven through Centralia numerous times but never found any reason to stop ... it's basically Chehalis.)

     

    According to a complaint filed by the U.S. Justice Department, following a referral from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Disney allegedly failed to tag kid-directed videos on YouTube as "Made for Kids" (MFK), a label that instructs YouTube to block personal data collection and stop displaying personalized ads on correctly designated content to protect children's privacy.

     

    cross-posted from: https://news.idlestate.org/post/2337003

    Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

    Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

    Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

    -_-

    view more: next ›