you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 1 week ago* (33 children)

Calling a black object "black" = Does not offend.

Calling your car's late ignition timing "retarded" = Does not offend.

Calling your dog a "bitch" = Does not offend.

Calling your rooster a "cock" = does not offend.

Calling a tied bundle of sticks for burning a "removed" = Does not offend.

Just follow your friendly dictionary and you'll be fine.

Also: Hi mods. You're probably here because of your word filter.

Edit: Something replaced "f-a-g-g-o-t" with "removed" automatically. I'm going to leave it because it's hilarious that bundled sticks are forbidden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    He's right. Individually, we are weak like a single twig.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    That's literally fascist propaganda. Fasces is Latin for a bundle of sticks and that was the image of strength that Italian fascists were trying to evoke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

    Oh, so there is an automated censoring system in place. I thought people were saying removed en lieu of re-tard on Lemmy on whichever instance I was visiting. Kind of like how people use unalive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    I don't think it's Lemmy. I think it's per-instance. Lemmy.world is not a great or open place. They're very close to Reddit, with way too much control over Lemmy where it's almost synonymous. Take this as a warning if you're creating a community or new account to spread things out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    .ml doesn't influence Lemmy much. Lemmy.world is the largest instance by far, and they leverage that control to force things on the larger Lemmy community. ml has issues, but at least they don't force things on anyone else. The lead developer of Lemmy is there, so they could, but they don't.

    Anyway, the point is that Lemmy is only as safe as it is diversified. People should be joining smaller instances, and communities created on other instances, rather than just going to the largest one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    Lemmy.ml is the flagship instance created by the Lemmy developers. I wouldn't say they don't influence that much.

    And Lemmygrad.ml... Well, they're their slaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yeah, like I said, they could, but they really don't. How often do you see posts from that instance in your feed? They influence each other, but it doesn't spread far beyond that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I saw them a lot until I blocked them.

    Also, the biggest communities for a lot of the more populat things are on .ml. I like anime, when I searched for a big and active anime comm, I headed first to the .ml one rather than to the .world one, because that second one was smaller. I still subscribed to bot; but then I noticed the tankie-pro-dictatorships nature of .ml and, at first, just argued, having some hope, then just blocked them when I noticed they're hopeless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I don't like them really either, but I think you're looking for something that doesn't exist. Yeah, they have some of the largest communities for certain things. That's how federation should work. My instance also has some, and many other instances. That's good. They don't have an outsized portion of them though. It's also pretty easy to block it and not miss much. If you did the same for .world then your feed would be almost empty. That's the issue.

    Also, why are you downvoting me (I assume it's you). That's weird for a discussion like this. Do you just downvote everyone who doesn't hold the exact same opinion as yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 1 week ago* (14 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    It's also the name of a meat dish in the UK. Sort of like meatballs in gravy. Although it's rarely used in the singular. Wonder if the link get censored https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(food)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Fuck off. Writing about how and why faggot is a slur is a legitimate use. Informing who used the term faggot in a degenerative way is a legitimate way to use it. Writing about the history of the word faggot also is.

    Censorship sucks.

    Automated Censorship is stupid and dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago*

    It's not that I just want to use slurs. I'm... um... principled! That's the ticket! Stopping me from saying slurs is a moral hazard. What if I were a historian and this were a conversation about the history of the slur?? It's not... but if I can construct a pretext then... uh... stop woke! DEI!

    Don't you understand there are categories of inferior people, and we need to be vile to them???

  • source
  • parent
  • If tomorrow some nazi fash starts using the word "goal" as some slur, would it be then incorrect to say "I have goals" or "omg, we're goals" ("we're goals" as "we're matching")?

    If we concede them every word they co-opt, then they'll colonialize all language. Just as with the word queer, we should be the ones reclaiming it for ourselves. That's a way of letting them controlling language.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    English isn't my native language. Hard-R is that retard?

    I fear that refusing to use those words even in a educational sense is rewriting history a bit.

    It's weird how americans who been all over the Internet claiming germany has no free speech because gloryfication of the Nazis is forbidden.

    Yet it was always fine to write that heil hitler was a common greeting of people who brutally murdered millions.

    While writing that fuckwit racists used the term nigger to put themselves over other humans is now frowned upon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I like to think of slurs as one of those, "we have freedom of speech but also you are not free from consequences for what you say," sorta things. So, yeah, go ahead and say it if you want to, but don't be a bitch about it if people tell you to fuck off or call you a Nazi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)