I don't really know where to post this but this community felt relevant, apologies if this is not welcome here, feel free to moderate, ping, and redirect me if I should share it elsewhere (especially because I'm not a good fact checker, but I felt like it would be interesting to have a level headed discussion about this drama).

I originally posted to !tesseract@dubvee.org, but a moderator there banned me and deleted the post, I'm guesing the Tesseract dev feels harassed by the whole situation, and do not want to hear about it any more. The community is now locked.

My original post read as follows:

"Was curious about The List™ and took a look at what it contained. There's interesting stuff that tells us more about the intentions of whoever made it.

I'm not making this list to pile one the current drama, I don't plan on being added to The List™. I just thought that, when something like this arises, one thing the Tesseract dev could have done is explain why some individual keywords are included, this would have been more transparent. Because when you look closer, there's some absurd stuff in there, which can lead to confusion as to why some are filtered out.

I can't be bothered to go through content posted by each individual user and community that are filtered out, so I skipped those.

Community names

  • ~25+ occurrences words referring almost exclusively to leftist political activism including but not limited to criticising american supremacy, the israeli-led genocide, racism, white supremacy, capitalism, paedophilia...
  • 4 occurences of anime related content
  • 3 occurences of right wing related content (Libertarianism, Conservativism, and a conspiracy theory)
  • usgreenlandwar
  • "Collapse" (discusses the environmental (and more) collapse of our civilization)
  • any word referring to the green party of UK (their main platforms: anticapitalism, ecology, progressivism)
  • "death to" (understandable, but depends on context)
  • 4chan (and similar imageboard names) + greentext formats
  • "billionnaire"
  • "anonymous"
  • 1 specific username and variants of their spam accounts / communities
  • "Police" or "Cops"

Keywords

  • ~30+ occurences of usernames, website urls, company names, sentences, to filter out spam / scam
  • ~30+ occurrences of various sentences almost exclusively used by leftist circles, including but not limited to criticising american supremacy, the israeli-led genocide, racism, white supremacy, capitalism, paedophilia...
  • 🥺?👉👈
  • "What would (france|the french) do" (probably to prevent referring to the guillotine or the french revolution, still funny)
  • "chatgip+ity+" used when someone criticises OpenAI's LLM
  • "censoring me" (maybe because conspiracy theorists often claim to be censored)
  • 4 Occurrences of sentences mentioning when an article is paywalled
  • "pedophile" (can't talk about it?)
  • "rap(e|ing)s? (kids?|child)" (can't describe the actions of the above?)
  • "Perchance" (random LLM related website)
  • 1 dead instance link, which was used by a computer science student that hasn't posted in 3 months
  • "neoliberal" (can't even name a specific political and economic ideology?)
  • "death to" (that one is understandable)
  • "pray for nuke" (same as above)
  • "remove from reality" (same as above but euphemism)
  • "Kirk(e|'|’)d" (used to refer to the murder of Charlie Kirk)
  • whenever any post is crossposted from a list of already filtered out instances
  • whenever any user from a list of already filtered out instances posts or comments

Website URLs

I started this whole summary ~2,5 hours ago based on my search history. There about 300+ direct url entries and I can't be bothered to check every single one of them (I've been looking up their domain name on google, then directly entered their url in a separate browser, and searched the domain on lemmy). I went through about half of them before thinking I had better things to do, here's the pattern(s) I noticed so far:

  • 4chan
  • Any Blogspot blogs
  • Any website hosted on Infinityfree
  • Lemmy instances the Tesseract dev considers to be extremist (some are part of the free anarchist flotilla (btw quick fun fact, FAF is short for fascist in french, it's ironic for us french lemmy users))
  • Any gumroad page
  • Any itchio page
  • Bunch of url shorteners
  • Bunch of piracy related sites
  • Bunch of cryptocurrency related sites
  • Some are obvious scam / spam / typo squatting sites NOT shared on lemmy
  • Left-wing related websites outweight Right-wing related websites 4 to 1
  • A lot of links are just random companies over the world without them ever being shared on lemmy, or being scams, or spamming the web about their services
    • there's a heavy bias against indian companies
    • very few of them were probably filtered out because of their company name, for example a printing company from chicago has "freaks" in their name
    • There's a french rodent control company that was filtered out, this one is interesting because its domain name is also the initials of the main left-wing french politician, but it could also have been filtered out because it obviously uses negative keywords related to their field. I feel like this perfectly highlights the flaws of this lists logic.
      • edit: that one was actually shared twice on lemmy by a user asking relevant questions, my guess is the dev added them preemptively to prevent spam
  • Some are links to website shared on lemmy, of those:
    • a lot were obvious scams / spams
    • some were ai related websites
    • few were just devs asking ONCE for feedback on their project

Anyway if anyone is motivated enough to take a deeper look and share their findings, or correct me if I missed/mislabeled something, feel free to tag me!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 months ago* (61 children)

My take on it is they wanted to tone down Lemmy, likely to appeal to a broader audience. Not saying it’s right, just my impression.

Guessing they were filtering political content as it can wear people down being hit with it constantly.

The reason I’d guess there’s more leftist keywords on the filter list is probably due to Lemmy just being more left. You don’t see a lot of right type content or communities here (outside of very specific instances usually already defederated).

Lemmy can also get pretty extreme at times which can be off putting to really anyone. Things like calls for violence and the like. Noticed he had “death to x” filtered, “guillotine” etc. so probably trying to filter out those type of extreme comments.

Not defending their imposition of their filter list on unsuspecting users, just my attempt to make sense of their reasoning behind it. Like, they could have offered this as an optional setting to people with what’s on it listed upfront. People already create their own block lists and filter lists, so having done the work for them, why not offer it as an optional feature? Lots of users hate seeing political talk around election time. Boom, already an option in the client, turn it on and off at will. It’s like having ad block list options.

I’m sure the dev is over it all with the slew of “I’m on the list”, “Why aren’t I on the list”, “Can I be on the list” type of posts beating down on them as they’re banning people for that. Gives the poster YPTB content tho, so win-win? But yeah they sorta brought the ridicule on themselves with this. Can’t be blamed when you break people’s trust and ruin your credibility like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 61 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (18 children)

    Sure but, if that really is the case the dev could just go ahead and... say... that? It could have been a transparent declaration or they could have made this at least "opt out". But instead it was done in the back, not documented or justified in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 45 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Only after the filter was discovered. That's not transparency, that's backpedaling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I have no idea what you're accusing me of. I didn't even make it onto the list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    I haven't misconstrued anything. Nobody knew about this until the whistle was blown. The dev even said in their own words that they were banking on people not noticing. That's not transparency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Again, I'm not even on the list, you are lashing out at the wrong guy. I'm an outside observer looking at the situation and giving my opinion of what I see.

    The only one forcing themself onto other people is the dev who snuck in this secret blacklist and heavily obfuscated it without telling any instance admins or end users. Lack of transparency is the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I haven't harassed anyone. In fact, the only harassment I see here is you harassing every single person in this thread who dares criticize this lack of transparency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    good thing you're not a victim! You just have have everything bad happen to you :(

    that mean ol dev attacked you with their lack of transparency on a project you are not forced to use and that affects nobody in any way that doesn't use it

    Now you're being harassed by someone who is accusing you of harassment. That's the real harassment!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Okay seriously, what is your problem? Why are you lashing out at every single person in this thread?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago*

    That’s what I’m saying. Dude 100% could have had a completely different outcome had he been upfront, made it opt-in, and been transparent. He could have had a great feature of filter lists, instead he hid it and forced it on people without their consent.

    Would have had a wildly different outcome.

    Still would have pissed some people off who felt targeted by the filters, but again, opt in.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    There's so realm where any of this is ok. There's no reasonable thought behind mass banning anyone you might disagree with, or to make that choice for the rest of us. He didn't "ban politics", he banned left wing politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    He didn’t ban anyone. It’s a filter. Is it right that he shipped this to people without telling them or asking for their consent to it? No of course not.

    You act like it’s targeted specifically at left wing. Lemmy just happens to be more left wing, therefore there was more to filter. There’s right wing shit on there as well. If right wing bs was more common on Lemmy you’d probably see more keywords matching that.

    You could be right tho. I know absolutely nothing about this dev, and wouldn’t if it weren’t for all the drama. I’m just making assumptions about their intent and thought behind it. All I can do is guess at it with what’s in front of me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    It sounds to me like he didn't ban anyone on purpose and implemented this list in lieu of blocking or banning people so that there would be no mod log paper trail. Because he is a mod and therefore could have just banned the accounts from his instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -36 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    He did tell them, this was never a secret, admins cannot ban people from instances they do not own even if they wanted to, this is not a default Lemmy UI and the feature is easily disabled in the GUI for those that opt in.

    Everyone making up facts to justify their victimhood is demonstrating exactly why someone might want to exclude them from an instance in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    You:

    He did tell them, this was never a secret, [...]

    Him:

    Because I’ve been pretty blunt about all of this, I’ll keep it going. There’s no good way to do what I wanted without either sounding like a dick, calling people out, or otherwise causing mass ire. There’s just not. Basically I was just banking on people not noticing until they’ve already had some kind of feeling that “Lemmy just feels more friendly lately” and putting two and two together when realizing why.

    So why you are spreading literal disinformation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Crazy that the whole tesseract sub got deleted 10 minutes after you commented here. You realized you were outing yourself during the unhinged rant. Pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    I think what's problematic is some of the bans seem to target the LGBTQ community (blahaj and wholesomeyuri being notable examples), as well as smaller news comms.

    Another bit is how broad and sporadic the user ban list is. Sure some of the users appear to be of the abrasive type (like me for example, I get the feeling I could be nicer at times). But a lot of the names on it simply aren't problematic and have clean comment histories, empty of any political comments even.

    I'm fairly certain Admiral Patrick was running a custom fork of his front end with a "ban from tesseract" button he'd use whenever someone seemed to mildly go against his world views.

    It was slipped into his front end as well in a way that qualifies as malicious imo. He is an admin of his own instance, he could have simply blocked everyone at an instance level with the normal Lemmy modding tools. This was a way to circumvent the modlog so it wouldn't show and it was hidden inside a front end solution he was actively trying to distribute. It's incredibly shady. I left Reddit in part because of the shadow banning and hiding content, and this guy is trying to recreate it and spread it like some kind malware.

    It feels like it goes against every principal the federation system stands for. I trust my instance admins to make the banning decisions, but he wants to add an extra hidden layer without informing anyone, hide it and then distribute it? It's highly unethical and frankly arrogant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    He is also hiding comments with word lists. If you have "Zionist" or "Epstein class" in your comment it won't show. A lot of the user bans use regex so at least one other user caught a ban because they have "grimy" in my case (asgrimyr). It's quite insane tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Yeah the user bans and the like, I got nothing. Your explanation would make sense. Idk how you end up with that many users on a filter list.

    I did get a chuckle seeing beep on there after all the drama

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I agree, I also would like sometimes to not check Lemmy/mastodon and immediately get angry, but dev could've worked in a very different way to let people who don't want too much of that content. For example if a user wanted none of cat videos and pics, a simple customizable exclusion filter would take care of that, using a list of that sort (and hidden on top of that) makes me think the aim was another, and more personal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -21 points 3 months ago (22 children)

    The dev posted a response in c/Tesseract but you're mostly correct. They wanted to make it easier for like minded future admins to be able to spin up a Lemmy instance without having to know all of the lore.

    I have to imagine the dev is enjoying all the attention because it's basically free advertising to anyone else out there who wants the same kind of experience. Since the fediverse is decentralized, there is infinite room for all kinds of moderation styles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (21 children)

    Well, except they pulled it because they were getting raked over the coals, and rightly so, for hiding something like this and pushing it on people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    FYI, you're replying to the dev. This is one of their alt accounts. They're attempting damage control on all these threads with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    But are you really an alt of Admiral Patrick?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Do you have proof on that? Genuinely asking. Haven’t been keeping tabs on it too closely aside from the main post that went up about it cross posted everywhere and the shit posts about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You can check their comment history. They've confirmed in other threads when called out, and they also just replied to my comment above, confirming it. Granted, they gave a relatively sarcastic reply, but I don't see any /s, so...

    They're making an effort to track down and counter every negative thread about Tesseract, then acting like a chud when people counter them, so whether they're the actual dev or not is kinda irrelevant at this point. They're 100% in support of Tesseract's ban list and they're working tirelessly against everyone trying to make that information publicly known.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -13 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Eh I think it's a great feature but thankfully nobody here gets to control how I use my own computer.

    The fediverse is big enough for everyone!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Listen, I'm all about not harassing you personally, but when you come in here with an alt and try to act like an impartial observer, it really seems like an asshole move and I start to reconsider that. Why not come in here and defend yourself if that's what you're going to do? You're just digging a deeper hole for yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    :Doesn't see need to defend self:

    :Uses alt to defend self:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Wow, you're really just trolling now? I guess I'm just going to use my ability to block users that I don't like, which is an inherent part of the Lemmy UI and integrated into most (all?) apps, to never see you again.

    Ironic...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)