the trojan fan (media.piefed.social)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
❤ 2
 
trojan fan
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 457 points 3 months ago (57 children)

bladeless fan
looks inside
blades

  • source
  • hideshow 57 child comments
  • [–] 374 points 3 months ago* (27 children)

    wireless router

    looks inside

    wires

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 3 months ago* (16 children)

    wireless not wirefree

    Edit: apparently Voyager doesn't do underscores for italic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    _ It works on my end (without leading and trailing spaces) _ -> It works on my end (without leading and trailing spaces)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Looks like it's specifically when an underscore follows a normal letter instead of whitespace. Not sure if that's as intended by the markdown spec, incorrect in Voyager or unspecifed

    With underscores:

    normal_italics_ normal italics

    With asterisks:

    normalitalics normal italics

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Looks like it's specifically when an underscore follows a normal letter instead of whitespace. Not sure if that's as intended by the markdown spec, incorrect in Voyager or unspecifed

    That's almost certainly intended behavior, otherwise any underscore would trigger formatting (much like the asterisk does instead of allowing snake_case_naming

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    markdown uses asterisks for italics.
    2 asterisks is bold
    3 is italic and bold

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I know. Underscores also work though for italics

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You mean the other way around, right? Marketing ---> looks inside ---> scam

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Deceptive marketing and scams are interchangeable because they're the same thing—the direction doesn't matter. I put scam first because it was in the previous commment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    It turned into a heated argument with a manager who, in the middle of project she complains is "taking too long" (despite constant scope creep, moving targets of adding stuff and changing expectations)...she walks up to my desk with her home modem/router she got from ISP. She kept saying it's "wireless" but didn't understand that 1. You still needed to plug the coax into the wall and 2. YOU STILL NEEDED TO PLUG THE POWER CORD INTO THE FUCKING WALL

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 123 points 3 months ago (22 children)
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (18 children)
  • [–] 41 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    There's a bit in 'deadpool and wolverine' where they're in the multidimensional junkyard and characters from marvel properties with aborted film projects also end up there. So like 'blade', and the various attempted 'fantastic four' movies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Well, the latest F4 hasn't been abandoned yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    They've tried like ten times and they're always bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Pretty confident it's from Deadpool and Wolverine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Can't believe I forgot about that. Best Blade movie since the original.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    I actually quite liked all of them to some degree. I even enjoyed the awful CGI rubber ninjas fight scene; I know the movement was unrealistic but I was young enough that I figured it was superhuman vampire flexibility. However, I agree that the first one was the best.

    Trinity was my second introduction to Ryan Reynolds, so that helped some. (I'm pretty sure I first saw him in Van Wilder.) Also Wesley Snipes saying "gootchie goo" to a baby was pretty hilarious, though reflecting on that I'm not sure they ever explained how he got that child back to its mother.

    Also, I think Natasha Lyonne was in that. I knew I recognized her when my wife started watching OitNB, but it took me forever to figure out why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Well, I guess I'm about to watch Blade 3 again.

    The "rubber ninjas" instantly ruined the film for me. That scene is seared into my memory, and takes second place after the entirety of The Phantom Menace for film betrayal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)