โฒ 49 โผ Not a single one (sh.itjust.works) submitted 3 months ago by einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to c/science_memes@mander.xyz locked 104 comments fedilink hide all child comments ๐ฟ 5
[+] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 0 points 3 months ago (3 children) I don't know what this has to do with my post at all to be honest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children) It's relevant because the less-resource-efficient oil industry has lobbied to make nuclear power artificially inefficient so that their industry can continue to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I don't think anyone is arguing for the oil industry. Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 0 points 3 months ago (3 children) I don't know what this has to do with my post at all to be honest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children) It's relevant because the less-resource-efficient oil industry has lobbied to make nuclear power artificially inefficient so that their industry can continue to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I don't think anyone is arguing for the oil industry. Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children) It's relevant because the less-resource-efficient oil industry has lobbied to make nuclear power artificially inefficient so that their industry can continue to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I don't think anyone is arguing for the oil industry. Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I don't think anyone is arguing for the oil industry. Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale. permalink fedilink source parent
