Not a single one (sh.itjust.works)
๐Ÿฟ 5
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 36 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Efficient use of resources still matters in a service-driven model.

The service in this case is to provide electricity - if other alternatives can provide the same system of electricity while using less resources in the process, then it is clearly preferable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 87 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Externalized costs are a thing though. For instance, a coal plant spewing smoke (and radiation) costs everyone else money. A nuclear plant OTOH is usually responsible for dealing with all of its own shit. So it's not always an apples to apples comparison to consider just the profitability of a project.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I don't know what this has to do with my post at all to be honest

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It's relevant because the less-resource-efficient oil industry has lobbied to make nuclear power artificially inefficient so that their industry can continue to exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't think anyone is arguing for the oil industry.

    Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)