you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 107 points 5 months ago (58 children)

Only predators buy those glasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 58 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 50 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You described me, and I still find those glasses creepy. It’s so much cheaper, easier, and less ethically fraught to just say “oh hey man how are you doing!” and fake it for a minute. Or tell them you’re having a brain fart and keep wanting to call them [random name] even though you KNOW that’s not it. Or, god forbid, just be upfront with people and tell them you’re face blind AF and struggle with placing faces to people outside context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Oh yeah, that's a good reason to aid the expansion of global surveillance. Let's all be complicit with the police state because we can't acknowledge our social anxieties with a bit of honesty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    that kind of motivation is a bit like "its winter and I'm very cold, lets set the city to fire". I guess it won't be cold anymore for you! It's not for wanting to harm other people, it's just an obvious alternative motivation.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yep!

    And as cameras get smaller, pretty soon any glasses will be suspect, meaning that those that need vision correction without being able to wear contacts for whatever reason will also end up lumped in with the creeps.

    This is like Batesian mimickry but stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Oh don't worry. Google filed for a camera contact lens patent years ago. It's coming as soon as they can figure out the tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    This sounds like a bigger underlying problem that can be addressed with a long term solution that does not leave you reliant on a second fragile, expensive battery-powered device with planned obsolescence and social stigma as likely risks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Man, some of ya really need to learn how to socialize

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Normally I'd agree but that can just come with being on the autism (and other) spectrums sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Oh I'm quite aware, but state sponsored surveillance tools are not the answer to that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    Oh yeah no arguments here.

    Meta execs deserve the woodchopper and all.

    Though it gets difficult when its someone's only available answer. I get why some people would choose it, but also agree as a whole its detrimental to society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I support smart glasses. Not from meta or Google or whatever the fuck.

    The more cameras we point at cops and people in power, the better.

    The moment an open-source privacy focused set of frames exist, I'm buying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with your premise, but only if it's stored locally and not sent to a corporation, who is likely going to share videos that help to convict other people of crimes but not allow access to video that shows cops doing something wrong.

    But also, there should be a legal requirement to have a light visible when recording. If you're found violating this, it should at least be a sizable criminal offense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    It should have to light up when recording. Like, at a hardware level.

    Surveillance at critical points like arrests seems important in order to have basic accountability. Surveillance all the time if you know it or not is more of a slippery slope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Have a light that beams out from beside the sensor through the same lense, no way to cover it without blocking the camera

    Have a visible dot shutter that closes when it's not recording,

    Require you to touch the temple on the frame the whole time it's recording.

    There are ways

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (25 children)

    I've heard those sorts of glasses can be handy if you're visually impaired and, say, clothes shopping. You can ask the glasses "hey, do these items match?"

    Still creepy in the wild, but there are some valid use cases.

    edit to add examples:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago* (13 children)

    Nah. My wife is legally blind without her prosthetics. She's rather stay blind than use these.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Glasses to help see are prosthetics. People can be legally blind when not wearing their corrective lenses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (7 children)

    Ok that's fair. I've just never heard of glasses referred to as prosthetics and assumed you meant some kind of artificial seeing device. Which is suppose is what glasses are but I was hoping for a more high tech answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    (the account you just replied to isn't the account with the blind wife who uses prosthetics)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    While this is correct, I AM, in fact, someone who wears glasses and knows some stuff about them and their uses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yep, no shade on you, I just didn't want the other person to think they'd heard back from the other other person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Real question: do other lemmy viewers not show usernames on posts or do a lot of people just not read them? Cause I’ve deffo had other instances of people not realizing they were talking to someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You don't need glasses for that, you could simply use an on-hand camera, maybe a special phone for those with vision problems

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    The glasses seem like a better form factor than a hand-held phone, for the use case where you're out and about and your hands are full, managing a service dog harness and/or cane, and trying to shop.

    So, I guess you could mount your special phone for the blind on your chest or waist and have it talk to bone conductive headphones you're wearing. And pick up whatever you'd like described and hold it in front of your chest/waist.

    (There's other options, the glasses just seem more convenient because they're on your face.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    You could carry a laptop and use it's webcam too

    It's down to convenience. I'm already looking at what i'm what i'm trying to film, instead of just recording that, i'm looking at my phone screen to try to record the thing and not even witnessing it in real life. I'm at my kids track meet, any time i'm trying to record him running i'm experiencing it through a 5" amoled screen so i my wife can have a video instead of just being there.

    We can figure out how to make them impossible not to notice they're recording. we just need privacy shutters or to have to hold the temple or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, and anyone that buys these glasses to increase their independence is a predator, like the parent poster says. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    to increase their independence? are you kidding me? then don't be surprised when that so very important function to give clothing advice will suddenly become a subscription service with ever increasing fee! all the while still trampling on the privacy of everyone near you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)