you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 7 months ago* (8 children)

No, neither will it be cheaper.

People stopped building those some years ago.

(But those incredibly expensive concentrators with a single tower are more efficient. Nobody is building those anymore either.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I assume not efficient enough to justify cost

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Turns out that sunlight is very cheap. You need a lot of efficiency to justify any extra cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Plus, you get a lot of lag when heating water with concentrated solar. Overnight your water cools down, so you need time to get it back to boiling temperature before it can generate any power. That lag gets worse during winter and cloudy days

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    In some ways, that lag is good. You can cheaply replace batteries with just a thermal mass.

    But it's not good enough to make up for the cost difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    They used to be cheaper. Solar is bananas cheap now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Generating electricity by boiling water used to be the cheapest option, but nowadays it's a bottleneck that itself is way more expensive than the alternatives that people actually build.

    It only got cheaper with time, though. It's the alternatives (PV, wind, batteries, gas) that improved a crazy amount.

  • source
  • parent