you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 8 months ago (8 children)

How inefficient, I could fit 100 squares in there easily.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Only 100? Pathetic, with my improved algorithm I could get at least 121 squares.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Psh I could fit like 1 square in there. Tryhards

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments