you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Why not? Let people know he said that.

Not reporting on it before Trump is how people thought it started with Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    No, that’s not accurate. One, reporting on what before Trump? On what? Next, using his idiot terminology as if it is legitimate does not help anything. “51st state” is a disgtusing, moronic and nonsensical phrase he uses and they are legitimizing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (5 children)

    American 51st state threats. If they had been reporting on it before Trump then people would realize it didn't start with Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    This is a really stupid line of reasoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (3 children)

    How do you figure? America makes these threats for years, no one cares to report on it then it gets reported on with Trump and the loser thinks it shouldn't be reported on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Because they weren't real threats when the government wasn't the ones saying it...

    I don't care about random pundits saying bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments