you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 78 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Welcome to the field of engineering! Your first lesson will be; "Tolerances and you"!

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Never, in any engineering field, have I EVER seen anyone simplify pi to 5. For that matter, I have never seen anyone simplify to 3. It is always 3.14. I feel like pi simplification is a weird meme that people think engineers do but is never practiced anywhere.

    It's like if there was a meme about chefs saying they always replace eggs with grapefruit. No they don't, and it's nonsense to think they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    There's less and less reason to do it (and it's never 5). On systems without floating point you might want to round it a bit, but only if the specific thing you're doing allows it, and even then you're more likely to do a fixed-point approach by using e.g. 314 and dividing by 100 later, or adjusting that value a bit so you can divide by 128 via bitshift if you're on a chip where division is expensive. However, in 2025 you almost certainly should have picked a chip with an FPU if you're doing trigonometry.

    And while rounding pi to 3 or 4 is certainly just a meme, there are other approximations which are used, like small-angle approximations, where things like sin(x) can be simplified to just x for a sufficiently small x.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    you've never seen anybody simplify it to 3 when doing head calcs without a phone nearby?

    it doesn't happen often, in fact I've seen it once. in a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment