▲ 857 ▼ Great Mug (lemmy.ca) submitted 10 months ago by MattW03@lemmy.ca to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] blarghly@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] xep@discuss.online 13 points 10 months ago Science isn't a belief system. It's a way of making sense of natural phenomena. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) Science is knowledge discovered through the scientific process. Knowledge isn't belief. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) we define "science" as the aggregate consciousness of scientific researchers This is something I wish I could preach convincingly to everyone. The activity of scientists, a social group, are arguing and trying to convince one another that their interpretation of the data acquired by using their tools and methods is what become a scientific consensus. Forefronting the method (often a vaguely defined one rooted in a hypo-deductive model from about 150 years ago that most people learned in grade school) removes the relationships between people and other people and people and institutions. I wish I could find the paper but there's a wonderful enthographic study on how scientists interact with each other to transform the discourse. Edit: Found it! Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry by Helen E. Longino permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xep@discuss.online 13 points 10 months ago Science isn't a belief system. It's a way of making sense of natural phenomena. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) Science is knowledge discovered through the scientific process. Knowledge isn't belief. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) we define "science" as the aggregate consciousness of scientific researchers This is something I wish I could preach convincingly to everyone. The activity of scientists, a social group, are arguing and trying to convince one another that their interpretation of the data acquired by using their tools and methods is what become a scientific consensus. Forefronting the method (often a vaguely defined one rooted in a hypo-deductive model from about 150 years ago that most people learned in grade school) removes the relationships between people and other people and people and institutions. I wish I could find the paper but there's a wonderful enthographic study on how scientists interact with each other to transform the discourse. Edit: Found it! Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry by Helen E. Longino permalink fedilink source parent