▲ 582 ▼ Lol, lmao even. (mander.xyz) submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 5 points 10 months ago (2 children) LMAO right. This PhD = Genius trope needs to end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) How much of that is the fault of colleges? All that shit about requiring science majors to take liberal arts classes or art majors taking calculus to make them "well rounded." A bachelor's degree is supposed to be a mark that you're just all around better educated than someone with a mere high school diploma, to the point that "It doesn't matter what you major in, just get a degree" is somehow valid advice. But a doctorate is awarded for a significant work of original research; a Ph. D. means you're the world's foremost expert in some tiny corner of a sub-discipline, kind of the opposite of being "well rounded." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 1 point 10 months ago But even then, knowledge ≠ intelligence. And there are plenty of fields that get it completely wrong. You could argue the majority of economics PhD’s get so stuck into the dominant model they might be less intelligent w.r.t. actual resource distribution than an amateur. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) How much of that is the fault of colleges? All that shit about requiring science majors to take liberal arts classes or art majors taking calculus to make them "well rounded." A bachelor's degree is supposed to be a mark that you're just all around better educated than someone with a mere high school diploma, to the point that "It doesn't matter what you major in, just get a degree" is somehow valid advice. But a doctorate is awarded for a significant work of original research; a Ph. D. means you're the world's foremost expert in some tiny corner of a sub-discipline, kind of the opposite of being "well rounded." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 1 point 10 months ago But even then, knowledge ≠ intelligence. And there are plenty of fields that get it completely wrong. You could argue the majority of economics PhD’s get so stuck into the dominant model they might be less intelligent w.r.t. actual resource distribution than an amateur. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 1 point 10 months ago But even then, knowledge ≠ intelligence. And there are plenty of fields that get it completely wrong. You could argue the majority of economics PhD’s get so stuck into the dominant model they might be less intelligent w.r.t. actual resource distribution than an amateur. permalink fedilink source parent