you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

This all makes sense. If we're getting a nuclear deterrent with this, that would be money well spent. If it does not and we endure any significant austerity as a result, then Canadians might straight up replace Carney with someone who welcomes annexation. This might call for debt-spending to avoid that, but I'm feeling Carney might like austerity instead. I hope I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There is no way the USA will allow nukes that close to their country. Did we forget about what happened when nukes were going to be located to Cuba?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment