[–] 15 points 3 weeks ago

How about using the radio alphabet, and then picking two words each time? Then you'd have some 26^2 combinations, which is hopefully enough.

The good part is that this would take meaning out of the words, because when thinking about it, also words like echo and cape will evoke some emotional connotation inside you. But when treating the words as just another form of cold and objective identifier, like they are used in radio communications, that may take the emotional connotation out of them.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    how about we just dont use random names from other cultures, completely separate from their actual meaning

    i mean its not that big a deal to me but it is kinda lazy

    again the palantir example would be rage baiting though

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    Generally it just means a collection of tools, patterns, ways of working, optimizations, testing systems, etc. I’ve been writing software professionally for 20ish years and the value of building a software factory almost always is only realized by the enterprise. Mainly because you also need enough smart engineers to upgrade and adapt the factory to the ever-improving and shifting software landscape and ecosystem and evolving business goals. I can’t imagine anyone who would have enough free time to build a software factory for hobby projects, except for those who hobby projects are their actual job, e.g. full time open source developers.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I have a feeling this is actually a llm benchmarking fan in disguise. Look at the perfect benchmark chart. It even has cost-per-task.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    This is interesting because even though they designed the language to be impossible for LLMs to use, Claude still scored nearly 70% on their benchmark.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago*

    Then on top of that, it hallucinates and lies. Chances for bugs or things getting snuck in increase. Since people didn’t write the code, they don’t understand it, so maintainability goes down.

    This is called a "self correcting problem". If it doesn't work people will correct by either "not using it" or "learning to use it more effectively".

    Do you think everyone is just going to throw their hands up and be like "well the ai done fucked up again, what're you gonna do?"

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    In this case what is meant by a "software factory"? Is this like a collection of first party modules, templates, and boilerplate code to make the creation of future projects easier? Is it meant as a freelance design business? Or is a "software factory" something completely different?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I run Jesus in a cluster in my homelabs. Overall good software suite, but kind of resource intensive. Highly recommend a judus instance as well to help watch and kill Jesus instances before they cause an OOM.

    But overall best Wine in K8s suite out there /s

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Holy fuck, this guy is basically playing the "it's so fucking joever, roll over and die" card.

    The frontier labs are working on both models and products, and the models get better based on the user's experience of a product. The labs' number one goal is to remove friction and let you build cool stuff. I'm having a hard time competing with that. Why would I even want to?

    Here's a reason : because these pricks are taking the money you feed into them for their "tokens" to further fuck over humanity as part of a gigantic system of surveillance.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev