this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026

54 points (75.5% liked)

Programming

programming@programming.dev

29,212 readers

2,795 active

111 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

moderators

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

I built a programming language that LLMs can't use (blog.picheta.me)

submitted 3 weeks ago by inari@piefed.zip to c/programming@programming.dev

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And that's without any of this being in its training set. I wonder if they realized how big of a self own that is.

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] aldhissla@beehaw.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

As well-intentioned as this might be, I doubt they understand how trained models work.

parent

[+] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

How the hell is this a "self own"?

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] aldhissla@beehaw.org 7 points 3 weeks ago*

The premise was that this language is significantly different from other languages in terms of being understood and replicated by an LLM.

The result showed that an LLM does exactly as well with it as you would expect.

parent