WaterFox
What's the point in encrypting user data in transit if you're just gonna leave it unencrypted at rest??
Basic HTTPS does the trick of encrypting transfer, easy as fuck to set up, does not mean the app is any more secure tho.
Database encryption is usually not necessary if it is kept on a private network. Setting up sensible auth is usually enough. They kept some doors unlocked, tho.
Just get a 256GB SSD and boom, cheap RAM - albeit slow
Sadly, the answer can range from super technical to super boiled down version. Depending on individual's knowledge, money reserves, and the will to set things up the proper way.
Here's the boiled down version: You will need a server with a public IP address, preferably a hostname. The server has have SSH access. Then it is whichever way is most convenient - direct install, docker, etc.
I, for example, have a Scaleway + Cloudflare DNS for my server and run everything in Docker behind Traefik reverse proxy that automatically serves certificates.
The price is about 15€ for the server per month, DNS is free, domain is under 20€ a year - although way cheaper ones exist.
For anyone not liking Tapo, a good alternative is Reolink. They offer about the same features, but use cameras with higher megapixels.
People always ask why even paying users exist - simple, I am a paying user myself, and by that I hold the power to actually cut their revenue rather than just leave the platform.
For when setting up a kube cluster is too time consuming and you still need basic clustering.
Right before Facebook, Instagram, Xitter, and probably some other social scourges that I forget about.
Strange, postgres is usually not the one to die. My server is permanently running out of space, so I have to keep deleting shit, and my PG did not die once. On the other hand, my other very old server (not updated in 3 years) has it's PG die (and automatically restart) at least once a day.
It is always either that the license is not permissive enough, too many changes are required that upstream wouldn't merge and its would be hard to keep rebased, showing the world that they can be absolutely independent, or not having enough experience and experts for given stack. Maybe I missed some reasons, but that'd be all I think of.
Either way, if it's open sourced our company might switch.
It is actually not hard to extend the software. I, for example, set up automatic uploading of cal recordings to a Peertube instance.