[–] 9 points 4 weeks ago

It's funny because one of the main selling points of AI is that it can run 24/7, doesn't need to sleep, eat, or take breaks and it doesn't need a salary. But, if they imply that it is conscious and has emotions, doesn't that mean that it should get a salary and vacations?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    We tried that at my job, who are pushing AI down our throats.

    I'm not sure how they can say with a straight face that they now expect us to do 300-700% more work (their estimate) for the same pay and the same hours as before, but they apparently can... Just capitalism things I guess.

    They also ridiculed the person who asked in front of the whole company.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    I'm a developer and I love it, but hate the current state of the field. I would quit my job and start my own company. It would be a lot less scarry if I didn't have to worry about making money. I could just make the things I wanted.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Probably.

    My company is currently pushing "loop engineering" on us... They are in love with Claude and keeps referring to it as "him". Very proudly announce that "I set ut a loop, and he closed 40 PRs while I slept!" (without review, of course). Based on vibe written tickets as well, which contains many hallucinations.

    The poor QA department (2 people) is now trying to figure out how to test all the slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Of course you have to specifically look for anti-AI research, because the ones making money of AI are flooding the feeds with pro-AI propaganda. You obviously won't find an unbiased view if you're looking for anti-AI research, but you definitely won't find it just scrolling online either, then it will be overwhelmingly positive.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Can you tell me the name of the theme, please? I think it's one I've seen around in YouTube videos, and been looking for for ages, but I've never found the name of it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I really hope you're right. My company is still in the "use as much as possible" phase, and my manager is quoting Jensen about "you need to use half your salary on tokens!". I'm looking for other work, but everyone is looking for vibe coders at the moment it seems...

    I've gone from really loving my job, to hate my life.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, that's the whole problem with how AI works, isn't it? (not considering the ethical and environmental impacts). It CAN work sometimes, but can then randomly choose to send the wrong text to the wrong number. It's completely random, and you can never know when it decides to do something other than what you tell it to do.

    It's like having a personal assistant that is sometimes competent, and sometimes a teenager in a mood. And it has no worries about being fired.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I totally agree with this.

    Whenever I see people criticise AI, it's usually because the company steals copyrighted content, with the aim to replace the people they stole from. Or the environmental impact of training and running the data models, which is awful. And, both of those reasons are good enough to not like AI, in my opinion. But, I feel like I never see people talk about the fact that all the answers it gives, is being filtered through a private corporation with its own agenda.

    People use it to learn, and to do research. They use it to catch up on news of all things!

    Like others have mentioned, Google has already been doing this a long time, by sorting search results they show to the user. But, they haven't written all the articles, the blog posts, the top 10 lists, or the reviews you read... until now. If they've wanted to, they've made certain things easier or harder to find. But, once you found the article you were looking for, it was written by a person unaffiliated with Google. All that changes with AI. You don't read the article directly anymore. Google (or any other AI) scrapes it, parses it however they want, and spit it back out to the end user.

    I'm very surprised that people are so willing to let a private corporation completely control how they see the world, just because it's a bit more convenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›