People use Brave even though Peter Thiel is one of its main investors. People use Brave even though it was created by Brendan Eich, a homophobe and Trump supporter

Thanks to Packman, many of us have been able to use openSUSE as the operating system on our PCs. I don’t currently use the Packman repository because, with the openSUSE openh264 repository, all the multimedia files I use work fine. Thank you for the great work you’ve done, particularly for enabling so many of us to use openSUSE; ever since we tried this magnificent distribution, we’ve stuck with the ‘chameleon’ of Linux.

The main reason is to use an open-source system. The secondary reason is to achieve greater digital sovereignty and reduce dependence on US technology companies.

Reason cannot be on the side of those who act in contravention of international law.

And what is the difference between them and the other countries in the Persian Gulf that leads Trump to regard some as friends and others as enemies? 🤔

Brave is asking for money to remove the bloatware it has added over the years and to be able to use the original browser it first released.

I don’t usually take the software creator’s ideology into account if it works well on my computer. However, I stopped using Brave when I found out that it’s a company funded by Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir and one of the most toxic investors around today. The combination of Brendan Eich and Peter Thiel has now pushed me past the point where I can separate software from its creator’s ideology.

That design of the new Skyline is an Infiniti with the Nissan logo. It’s a shame how little originality some brands show when designing new models.

The lack of originality in the designs and the reliance on nostalgia are signs that Nissan is not in the best of shape.

Why isn't openSUSE included in that table?

In Spain, for example, electricity prices remain low thanks to renewable energy. This guy is stupid.