No? Your religious restrictions aren't my problem. This one isn't allowed to eat pig so we stop giving out candy with gelatine, next one isn't allowed to take candy from a women so we have the men hold the plate, next one isn't allowed to see a women who isn't family so we banish our women to the kitchen. Just because the one does look more reasonable to you then the others doesn't mean the one isn't already ridiculous.
Winter is coming, we're not doing that again!
How are we gonna get a worldwide audience to have more sex though?
It's really just a steel frame that gets bolted to the wall. Further down someone linked to one from Geberit, cost like 120€. It also has the water tank.
Easier cleaning is one thing and the best feature if you don't care about the ecstatics. You can also chose the height freely.
As I'm currently building myself a house I can tell you that the wall mounted toilets are rated for 400kg at the tip,the furthermost from the wall, of the bowl.
I found everything I looked for in anna's archive so far. Since it's a simple file download I'd say it's save as long as law enforcement isn't already monitoring your connection. If that's the case you got already bigger problems.
While I fully support imprisoning corrupt politicians and we should do that more often, I wouldn't say that China does that. They get rid of politicians who aren't falling in line and corruption is just the vehicle to do it. Because everyone is. By design, I believe, not only does that allow the politicians to live in luxury compared to the poor folks working 12 hours a day, six days a week, but in case some politician is getting uncomfortable they can dig up corruption charges.
I guess some people in Brussels have to justify their positions and spend millions doing so.
I'm perfectly happy with the current design and I also wouldn't mind the birds but the EU institutes on the other side I do mind. It's just where the EU is governed from and that's really not important and just stokes the ego of the people sitting there. Put something significant on it.
It's just greenwashing. Companies do it all the time. Slapp some solar on it or use some insignificant amount of recycling and you got your press release which lazy journalist just have to copy. That lead to clickbait articles.
And if you're being honest you're just defending it because the "by China" in the title.
What a brave take!
If they recommend only 4 wouldn't it makes sense then to reduce the size of the flask?
