all 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I think it's important to understand, these people believe that they already control the world. From their perspective, they aren't "trying", they're doing. And they believe they have the right to do so. They believe that having wealth makes them more important and more capable than everyone else, even though the reality is often that having wealth separates them from having to actually do anything for themselves, making them less capable and less experienced than everyone else.

The rest of us, our needs, our concerns, our desires, our lives... none of that matters to them, except when it either enables or impedes getting what they want.

The only thing preventing the entire world from being stuck in complete, abject despotism is that these people are often at each other's throats. When they collude, everything they touch turns to garbage.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago

    The only thing preventing the entire world from being stuck in complete, abject despotism is that these people are often at each other's throats. When they collude, everything they touch turns to garbage.

    That's the hope. I'm sure there are a handful of billionaires who are decent enough people, tech co-founders who didn't get all weird about the tech money. But the other 98% are legit sociopaths. They can't co-exist for long, they're all secretly undercutting each other. It's in their nature.

    One possible future is letting the dragons fight it out, and picking off the stragglers. Fingers crossed 🤞

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Imagine fighting a long war where one side knows they are fighting the war, and a vast majority of the other side thinks they are trying to help them.

    There's no war other than class war. We've been fighting it for centuries. Remember that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Right but there are people amongst us poor who threw their lot in with the wealthy years ago. They're as much the enemy because they would fight on the side of wealth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    i think the oligarchs do defacto control a significant chunk of the world and they are trying to exercise that control to enact their deranged ai-hallucination-like version of reality that their confirmation broken brains think should be done

    thankfully they do not share these visions with eachother commonly and nation states are slowly making laws to prevent them abusing the global financial system

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    More accurate to say "several overlapping cabals trying to expand their own fifedoms"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Woah man. That's what conspiracy theorists argue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Nah, they think it's only one, and then oscillate between Bilderberg, the Knights Templar, and the Illuminati.

    IRL, there's a Venn diagram of 3 to 7 wealthy Cool Kids groups that all compete for influence and money. They're generally not even that secretive about it other than Peter Thiel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    The retreat is scheduled for August 12–16 at a venue near Dublin, Ireland.

    The original version of the source article identified the location as the Powerscourt Hotel; in an act of journalistic cowardice (to be expected from a Condé Nast Publication) Wired later edited their article to remove that detail "to address a security concern raised by a Dialog representative".

    Esquire is unsurprisingly sticking with Wired's "near Dublin" description of the location, but fortunately it looks like some Irish media outlets (eg this and this) are reporting where it actually is so hopefully there will be some local opposition present.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    How many of them have been on Rogan?'

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Has he had on Timothy Mellon, the second largest political contributor after Elon Musk in the last election cycle? Has he had on the Uihleins or the Adelsons?

    Only a small subset of the people making huge political donations want publicity, and only an even smaller subset of those are interesting enough that Joe Rogan would do a podcast with them.

    Don't think that most of them are interesting in a macabre way like Thiel or Musk. Most are old, crotchety assholes who inherited vast fortunes who aren't interesting, don't seek publicity, and just want to remake the world without pesky democracy interfering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Whilst this was always obvious and is not at all surprising, it's definitely worth reviewing the list which someone took the time to compile: https://github.com/nzaki-dev/dialog

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Why yes they’re called ‘billionaires’ and there’s like 3.5 thousand of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry for this odd question, but why "3.5 thousand" instead of 3500 or 3.5k?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    What's next? 'Actually, the sky is blue'

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 86 points 4 months ago (14 children)

    This is the reason why I always get way to mad at conspiracy theorists. You don't have to make up some shadowy cabal or the jews, be mad at the wealthy oligarchs.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    One theory I heard: Crazy conspiracy theories were created by the government to make legitimate conspiracy theories look ridiculous by association. "Oh, you think there's an island of pedophile billionaires running the world? I bet you also think the moon landing was fake." A classic "the butts match" gambit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Thats level one feury. Level 2 is when they tell you a well known asshole billionaire is going to fight the shadow cabal for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Shadow cabal and oligarchy aren't mutually exclusive. Seems to me the oligarchs are just the more obvious nodes of the shadow cabal web, the fuckers with the money and power that can go on TV and talk directly to senators.

    Go one step back away from the limelight and you get dudes like Cheney, Bannon, people who interact with all the obvious oligarchs but don't need to post on social media and don't need to stay relevant to constituents. And then people like Epstein, agents in the field gathering blackmail.

    Shit is pretty fucking crazy tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Yup.

    And in the 4 classes I've heard the spooks and crooks use, assets, agents, operators and architects, there are those above the agents like Epstein.

    I say "above". But, when looking to try see the top, it looks murky. ... Sounds more like the bottom. Of a swamp. Such is kakistarchy. Ruled by the worst.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    You know them, you know their names, net worth ranked etc.

    Among other things they were high on ket and thought they can teabag democracy in the face because everyone is so dumb.

    They have shits for brains now that betray the game blatantly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I almost wonder if Rogan is a useful idiot, if someone running his show is the elite crazy or at least wannabe elite.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    I think Rogan believes he's in charge though. He talks like he's making his own decisions.

    Undoubtedly he's being manipulated but yeah at the very least he's a useful idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Conspiracy theories are controlled opposition.

    Tell people to be mad at a made up shadow cabinet of rich lizard people who run the world in secret so they won't be mad at the actual, real, existing cabinet of rich human people who run the world out in the open.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Yup. It's just people. And we can still mend this.

    Don't fall for the "it's an all powerful force beyond your reach" misdirection.

    The emperor wears no clothes. We see the man behind the curtain.

    [PS, "conspiracy theories"'s a term the crooks have used to dissuade scrutiny of them.]

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    Other talks include “Build-a-Cult,” moderated by the founder of the Christian networking site Pray.com

    I mean, we all know what these people are about but I'm just taken back by the brazenness and openness of all of it.

    This is basically "Yes, I made a cult to become a billionaire with a following, what about you?" and somehow nobody bats an eye? That is, of course, nobody that could do something about this.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    There Really ARE Cabals of Elite Crazies Trying to Control the World
    It's more than this one.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Is Inside Job based on a true story?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    This shit never changes.

    And this is good old Boston, The home of the bean and the cod, Where the Lowells talk only to the Cabots, And the Cabots talk only to God

    • John Bossidy, 1910.
  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    yes... trying...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Having a lot of money doesn't make you immune to grifters, bullshit, facebook cooker theories or just plain going nuts.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago*

    “As you are probably aware I represent the Rothschild’s” -Jeffery Epstein in email to Peter Thiel

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    No, there's not.

    There's many of them, and they are all rich and trying to stab each other's backs to get more power and money.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    And history shows that EVERY time they felt their wealth and power were genuinely threatened, they conceded both. You don't even need a bloody revolution, they just need to see that it is a possibility before their thin skin starts crawling.

    The british monarchy saw the french revolution and invented the parliamentary system. The robber barron's saw the communist revolutions in the east and suddenly the new deal, suffrage, and civil rights. Today, the billionaires are outclassed and out numbered worse than either of those examples, and will crumple like a paper tiger the second their facade is broken. All they have is their propaganda networks to protect them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    It's not a cabal, it's all narcissists with money competing against each other. They all know what's best for them and are the main characters in their feeble minds.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    "They know what's good for them" -- George Carlin

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    And yet when people tried to point this out earlier, they were called conspiracy theorists. There are false conspiracy theories and true conspiracy theories. That's just how theories work. The ones that espouse true theories are then denigrated for seeing things faster than you.

    This is why labeling something a conspiracy theory is not a useful way to dismiss an idea. The dismissal is only right half the time. And the other half you are missing something important, or refusing to believe something without looking into it. Instead, more correct is to critically assess what is true and false and not what is a conspiracy theory and not a conspiracy theory. It's more work but it's also more correct.

    Who prefers the term "conspiracy theory" to be a shortcut for claiming an idea is false? A: People involved in actual conspiracies.

    Also, people who use that pattern to claim something is false just generally struggle with English. Conspiracy != Conspiracy theory != False. But a common trope of a useful idiot is to claim something is false because it's just a conspiracy. And a shocking number of people take that argument seriously. Despite the fact that this person can hardly differencial aspects in the English language, much less develop useful anticipation of how the powerful will strategize, or worse, comprehensively determine without evidence what is not possible there.

    If you discuss an idea of what powerful people will do, you are technically engaging with conspiracy theory. And we can't be having any of that!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Easy fix, just don't talk about what you know to random people. :)

    It's like trying to sell icecream to people who hate icecream. Also, I certainly didnt learn about these things from someones comment on the internet. It was just watching world events like 9/11 and not being a complete moron believing the official story. :)

    Then I got interested, found lots of good documentaries. YouTube used to be full of very good ones before they deleted them. I was very interested in that stuff.

    Now the world is very different and people are seeing evil openly in the white house even. But it was very different back then.

  • source
  • parent
  • 51 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post