all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Gary called it and is hopeful that we might get wealth taxes (video). Let's hope that Labour won't be absolute tits on the issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I bet this headline hits VERY different to anyone who hasn't paid attention for the last couple/few years to know about Reform the party.

    Without that context, he kinda sounds like a villain from a 1930s play 😄

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    There was a cult in the American sitcom Parks and Rec called the reasonablists. They were named as such because if you disagreed with them, that would make you seem unreasonable. I feel Reform is a similar trap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The name of Reform has always made me think of this too! You may as well call your party Nice Things. "Do you stand against Nice Things." "See this is why we don't have Nice Things."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I heard someone pronounce it RE-form, the way you'd say reformed ham. This is now my preferred pronunciation for the reasons above.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    What does RE-FORM stand for anyway?

    Is it:
    Racists
    Economic Fraudsters
    Oligarchs
    Rapists
    Morons

    or

    Raping
    England
    For
    Oligarch's
    Russian
    Money

    or

    Robbing
    England's
    Future
    Over
    Rape
    Movies

    or

    Ruining
    Earth's
    Future
    Over
    Risky
    Money

    or other?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Well that's probably better than any alternative.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Tactical voting, if continued by the left, is going to pull the Overton window strongly leftwards, and will ensure right wing parties have an extremely difficult time getting into power

  • source
  • [+] -17 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    So much mega-important, world changing shit going on and we have this media stoked in-fighting nonsense going on.

    Fucking politics man.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

    Would you prefer that Farage wins the next UK general election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Got to echo this.

    Unlike the low-stakes infighting nonsense that we often have, this is really important.

    Multiple polls have shown that not only is Andy Burnham much more popular than Starmer (big surprise, who isn't?), but that he's more popular than Farage. And that is a big deal, because almost nobody else is.

    He's an attractive choice for the left, and he's attractive for Northerners who want change - two camps which Starmer has well and truly lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Are any of the Left still in the Labour Party?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not really... but I bet there's quite a lot who'll simply follow the current party line, so if the Labour leader were to steer things leftwards towards the centre (or ideally past it), many of them would follow it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Starmer stood for Labour leadership on a considerably lefter platform than the vague stuff Burnham's been saying. Burnham as PM isn't going to change Labour's current policies. He might be better at campaigning. When people realise that nothing's going to change, helped by the rightwing press, they'll turn on him too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    The difference is that he's got form.

    I, like most people here (Manchester), voted against having a mayor in the first place. When the Tories made the position anyway, I voted against Andy Burnham.

    But he's absolutely won me over. In the time he's been mayor, directly because of his policies, Manchester has improved dramatically.

    Starmer promised a lot, but Burnham has actually delivered change already.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    No of course not.

    It just seems like their time could be better spent dealing with problems instead of infighting. Then maybe the deluded fools who've fallen for the Farage con would wake up.

    But that's wishful thinking. I'm old enough and cynical enough to see how little really changes. The rich still get richer with the rest fighting over an ever shrinking slice of the pie while politicians tinker around the edges.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    This is getting reported much more than the other by-elections that happened specifically because this one is quite likely to bring about a significant change in the UK's national politics

  • source
  • parent