top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96 points 5 months ago* (16 children)

bUt WhAtAbOuT wHeN iT's nIghTime u sTUpId LIbS!?!?!

-MF's who have never heard of a battery

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    they're also getting the benefits of solar, despite voting for the moron nixing renewables while peddling coal and oil.

    States won by President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election accounted for 74% of all solar capacity installed in the first quarter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    "Pffft ... batteries are for toys ... my delusions tell me the following pictures are fake because I say so and I don't need to prove anything because jesus tells me petroholics like me are always right:"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Obviously fake, everybody knows that batteries are ruined by rain. Just like magnets.

    Next you're gonna tell me that the Moon can come out during the day!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Heard a fantastic quote this morning for people with similar believes:

    This are the same people who ask ChatGPT what time it is

    Beautiful !

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    I've unironically met people who use ChatGPT for everything. (and who unironically now think magnets are turned off by water since the president said it)

    Like I literally had coffee with someone who while we were chatting they mentioned that they "asked ChatGPT if the place was queer friendly" before they agreed to go out for coffee.

    It's like bro, did the pride flags year round not tip you off? The maps link literally has pictures of the place with snow on the ground and pride flags in the windows!

    So many people have forgotten how to think and it's infuriating. They'll believe a chatbot before their own eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    That's great and all, but I'm still waiting for it to be affordable to install my own so that it can also be a whole-house uninterruptible power supply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    Obviously it depends on your use case but at least for me having an uninterruptible power supply for the maybe one day in 4 years that I have a power cut, it isn't worth it unless the installation cost is negligible.

    I think for most people putting a few panels on the roof is probably good enough. Especially if they end up getting an electric car in the end which can do reverse charging.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Stand to reason, the operating costs of a coal fired power station are immense compared to a renewable energy source. They can’t compete. That’s the major reason that industry doesn’t want to build them.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Here in Michigan Trump is using "emergency" orders to keep a coal plant running that the electric company was going to retire over a year ago. The order can only last 90 days but they've just renewed it every time.

    Thanks to this bullshit, rates are going up because it's costing so much to keep the thing going we're losing money on it. Consumers Energy doesn't even want to be operating it, they're trying to get it shut down but hur dur coal good can't allow that. And it's not the only one affected by this crap.

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/05/climate/trump-aging-coal-plants-electricity-bills

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    China used them and it is a funny situation on how there were complications and how they handled them and handled the further complications by their solutions. In the end they all lived happily ever after though in the funniest way possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 4 months ago (21 children)

    but experts say coal emits carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, and several other pollutant
    What the hell is this crap reporting. It's not like this is a contested fact or an opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    "Experts say power plants 'burn coal to convert water into steam.'"

    I mean, does anyone really know how these things operate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The tide comes in. The tide goes out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

    Every power source is a solar power source if you follow the trail back far enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Deep sea vents aren't, unless you're including the formation of the solar system as 'solar'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    *stellar, not solar, the carbon in coal wasn't formed by our sun but a different star far in the past

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah but the trees that made it into hydrocarbons were fuled by our sun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    Very weird of me to comment 2 weeks in the making, but this comment gave me a worm brain for some reason, like I'm RFK or something. Based on the idea that something is solar powered if it has any involvement with the sun at all, I wondered if I could think of a way to tie all non-solar powered sources to the sun.

    • Tidal used solar tides, but non-tidal hydro can also be solar power if you consider that earth was formed in Sol's accretion disk and water likely comes from comets pulled into the solar SOI (none of this is researched, just off the dome, no clue whether my yr 10 astrophysics is either outdated or completely misremembered)
    • ergo, the use of earth's gravity to power turbines via waterfalls etc is also solar power.
    • Originally, I thought I had a gotcha with nuclear power, bc uranium DEFINITELY doesn't have anything to do with Sol, no trees involved. But, because it uses water, you can use the same logic as hydro
    • even for Voyager, which afaik just uses the heat directly sans water, you can say that the uranium itself was first attracted to Sol's SOI before either being deposited on earth by asteroids or included in the accretion disk during earth's formation. (tangentially, not sure how you make a fission reactor without steel, which uses organic hydrocarbons. Titanium?)
    • The formation of the earth also allows attributing thermal and wind power to Sol.

    As a result of me realising I'm wrong despite desperately thinking I was right, I've decided to dedicate all 3 rubles in my possession to develop a power plant that only uses cosmic rays and other interstellar radiation (as well as neutrinos if I'm allowed to say they’re not really captured by the solar gravity well despite having mass, which I'm pretty sure I won't be allowed to do :c ) as well as fund interstellar colonisation efforts so that we can have extra-solar sun power, maybe hawking radiation and other fun stuff too. Escape the tyranny of the sun with me, brethren! Forego local Dyson-Swarms in favour of non-solar fossil fuels!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Sadly from personal experience, no, the general public does not know that coal power plants work by burning coal to boil water, and are horrified at how trashy the concept is.

    High-key a great way to persuade them to support renewables. Associate coal with the image of people in underdeveloped countries burning fossil fuels in their own homes to exploit their own preconceived biases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    Alternatively you can depict it as filthy and Victorian. Something that was once an improvement, but these days really only belongs in a museum. You can compare it to child labor and accurately point out that the Victorian era was grimy and disgusting because of how much coal was burned then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Surprised the Pedo-in-Chief doesn't immediately halt this so he can get more money from the coal lobbyists

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The MAGA response "No it didn't! No it didn't! Fox and The Anointed One didn't say so! Fake news! Fake news!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Solar is more efficient. The corporations will move over to the most efficient power source regardless of what the administration may or may not want. Continuing to use coal just to appease Trump is stupid.

    Anyway they can just lie and say that they are using coal for everything, it's not like anyone is going to check

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Bold of you to try to make a distinction between this admin and corporations. But of course, they'll hedge. My point is that they do so uphill and slowly, without the research, subsidy/tax incentives and media praise that would typically accelerate progress towards such an obvious next step

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Companies tend to be international. No matter what they might be telling the Trump administration in the United States if they've got solar desires in other parts of the world they're going to pursue them without having to prostrate themselves at the altar of idiocy. Hell, they might get praise in other countries for pursuing solar.

    So they know the economic benefits and they know their benefits would be doubled if they were operating in the US as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Those corporations are happy with the Hormuz situation you think? More likely they let grandpa shit his pants on TV because the current idiocracy is even more corrupt than the previous oligarchy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The current problem with mass solar plants is that they lose a good chunk of the stored energy before it is distributed to where it goes. Obviously far better than coal, but the panels need to be at the source of where they need to go, hence why roof top solar panels on buildings are great idea. Wind power is a lot more efficient, but it isn't like we can all plonk big windmills on our roofs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    This is actually a pretty major indictment on the US. Coal is one of the worst most inefficient fuel sources for power generation, virtually every other fuel source is an improvement including incineration of food waste.

    A good test of how efficient fuel is is to see how much of it you still have left after you've theoretically burnt all of it. The fact that coal smoke is black is a pretty good indication of how bad it is. You're throwing away a good chunk of your fuel.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I love the trivia that there's traces of uranium in coal which go up with the smoke - coal is worse than nuclear in terms of radiological pollution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is an often misquoted fact. The study that compared coal and nuclear was only studying air pollutants, and obviously the steam stacks from nuclear reactors don’t have as much radionuclide pollutants as coal. However, the study did not look at other sources like wastewater - which is where most radionuclide pollution from nuclear reactors comes from (along with other sources like spent fuel, casings, and moderator rods).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    Progress be progress. We’ll get there folks.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    All to be eaten by glutton data centers. Ugh.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (25 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    If it's about capacity factor then most people know about that by now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (22 children)
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (21 children)

    Tell me you didn't watch the video(s) without telling me you didn't watch the video.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (21 children)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The video is one and a half hours long so I don’t blame you, but it had the same point as you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    Really? You don't know youtube or how to copy a link without clicking on it? Wow!
    If you're 5 you probably shouldn't be using the internet but i can ELI5 you on how to, although i don't think the topic will interest you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    In their defense, most of the time when someone just posts a YouTube link on social media it's a complete waste of time. Video is very slow to get to the point, that's why we're reading!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You can copy paste the transcript (or download the vtt subs with yt-dlp) into any AI and let it hallucinate a summary for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    This particular youtuber is know to be "slow", but thorough in the topics he covers.
    This particular video has an "extra" 30m, you can stick to just the first hour.
    The TL;DR is that solar makes more sense than coal in the murican Midwest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's Technology Connections, and I can't imagine being so cynical that you assume every single poster is trying to ragebait you unless they cite and summarize every link. Like, why even be here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    "Everyone here is a random trolling hack" doesn't leave a lot of room for alternate meanings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Have to sit through ads just to see it's a 90 minute video with next to no context of why I should trust this person with my time. In a era where most info is at best wildly ignorant and at worst maliciously misleading?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Good point.

    (1:20:24) We are clearly living under leaders who have a completely different understanding of reality than the rest of us do, and they are so high on their own supply that their followers will believe abject lies. Renewable energy is only controversial because they made it so. And they don't want you thinking through the reality which is free energy from reusable materials, as I've just explained. They have donors who still make money selling you fossil fuels, and so they do not want you thinking about how much you're spending and how we have the opportunity to stop.

    (1:27:13) Be that helping hand. Organizing networks are popping up everywhere because those of us who managed to grow up into adults, who care about people other than ourselves, are not going to stand by and let this illegitimate government run by petulant toddlers, violate the Constitution and the very principles that make America great. My fellow Midwesterners in Minnesota have made me so proud. Stay strong and keep teaching us how to be brave and resist this horrible chapter of our history with steadfast, nonviolent defiance. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a lawless group of masked thugs terrorizing our cities and neighbors for daring to look not quite white. Anyone who has any understanding of history will know that it is happening here. And if you believe that to be true, then you should also believe that ICE must be abolished. And if that freaks you out, I'm going to guess you've been told the people who say that want completely open borders. Some people do, but most people simply took the poem on the Statue of Liberty as meaningful and think this country should open its arms wide and provide a legal pathway to immigration. Just as our ancestors did on the storied Ellis Island. It is our decades long inability to have true immigration reform occur which put us in this place and what we're doing today to fix it is clearly wrong. It is a racist ethnic cleansing operation happening on the pretext of childcare fraud, which was already being investigated and dealt with by the state of Minnesota, but which some terminally online weirdos somehow got wind of and spun into this madness. And that madness is being perpetrated by agents of the state and endorsed by Republicans. Republicans could stop this now, but they won't. and the reason I know we absolutely can abolish ICE? I am older than ICE. In fact, I'm older than the entire Department of Homeland Security. That agency was created post 9/11. And in retrospect, the folks who thought “Homeland” Security sounds kind of ominous were apparently correct. We need to throw this system out and start over. And so, yes, I believe ICE must be abolished. There is no reforming that agency of thugs. It has to go. And the lawless criminals hiding behind masks who are violating the Fourth Amendment day in and day out, need to be prosecuted for each and every one of their crimes. I will be voting in the primaries and I sure as well hope my representative, Sean Casten, starts saying that with clarity and conviction. Sean has been one of the people who understand the realities of renewable energy, and has been a long time advocate of it, so we've been pretty aligned, but we're not aligned on everything. And my patience is starting to break. So if you made it here. Thank you for watching. I hope we can bring some sanity back to this country and that we can start calling lies what they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -6 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    He called you names after pointing out you can copy a link without opening it. What about that? You implied doing that is impossible:

    Clicking on a link without knowing the website it leads to? By someone who doesn’t bother to say anything about the link? 😆 😂 🤣

    Those are the emojis of someone who's confidently wrong. Just admit you didn't even bother what the video tries to say by reading the comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›
    1 comment in c/news@lemmy.world view that post