top 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 5 months ago (1 child)

I'm glad they are being responsible by wedging the hose in there with a towel.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I don’t know much about safety but i’m like 90% sure they need one of those flammable signs with the numbers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    The number they'd need for gasoline is 1203, one of the few i have memorized. If you ever see a number on a truck, you can look it up on a hazmat number lookup site and it'll tell you what it's hauling. Usually it's gas, diesel, or propane, but sometimes it's something more fun

    Edit: i saw a truck with the number 1824 on it, looked it up, and it's a Sodium Hydroxide solution

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Couldn't they just add the name directly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    When transporting dangerous goods, they must be properly placarded with regulation placards.

    I still remember how much they use the word placard/placardable in the WHMIS training. Would be a fun drinking game if you survived the alcohol poisoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Shouldnt there be baffles in the tank to prevent sloshing?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I wonder if there’s even a gain in total miles they can travel given how much air resistance that sail adds. Wonder what RPM the engine is pushing going highway speeds.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Same speed = same RPM, regardless of load / air resistance. Unless they have to drive in a lower gear to make it work, but I doubt that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    More surface area = more drag. A big ol non aerodynamic cube will definitely be adding more drag. Other than that, yeah load doesn't really effect mpg

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    You just can't leave it home and fill it up daily, right?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Cannonball run, perhaps?

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Putting aside the stupidity. What are the actual benefits of this? It's not like gas is hard to come by.. And the added weight and reduced aerodynamics probably means fewer mpg, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Given the color it could be used cooking oil for a biodiesel conversion. But outside of cost saving from fuel ubiquity, none of it is an improvement for anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Pretty sure that car doesn't come in a diesel version.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Full engine swap? Makes it even more ridiculous if so but someone stupid enough to do this seems like the type.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    "Cost me a few C notes to fill this sucker up."

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Ahh, what's the worst that could happen?

  • source