top 93 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 270 points 5 months ago (19 children)

Oh, so dead internet is, in fact, the plan. Wonderful.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 149 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah but it happened a year earlier than planned!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Ahead of schedule you say? The shareholders will be thrilled!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Yup. Followed by the AI surveillance state. The Stasi has been digitized and never sleeps!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    except now they get useless data because they now just datamine bots, who are datamining each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    That’s what digital ID is for! To correlate the real humans activity. The Flock video surveillance can then be linked to your real world movements along with digital currency to track your buying habits! Your phone and wireless earbuds to listen for keywords a rat you out to the government! What a wonderful utopia!

    Feeling free yet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 125 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    says agentic traffic wasn’t expected to eclipse real people until next year

    ... which means, it already happened a year or two ago and it is much, much worse than anyone can imagine

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Ya fuck at this rate I'm gonna have to go outside to talk to a real person before the end of summer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's not true. I'll always be here to talk.

    I'll. Always. Be here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    Everyone, go find some indieweb sites. Reminiscent of 90s, there are minimal websites with visitor counters and guestbooks.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    How, uh... how do we find them? I'm presuming Google isn't really an option, since they drive traffic in the opposite way. Got a link to a list of them or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    that they expected it to eclipse real people AT ALL is both telling and slightly disturbing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 98 points 5 months ago

    Dude! We said we wouldn't completely fuck up the Internet until next year!

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (29 children)

    Well goodbye the internet, what advertiser is going to pay anything if they know the majority of user are bots.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (25 children)

    Are advertisers absolutely necessary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    Advertisers are essentially subsidizing many businesses. Costs are higher than you think and most products we enjoy are expensive.

    Yes, there is FOSS, but you’re essentially fucking lucky that people that work on those want to do this from the passion they have. Most people don’t, and won’t, do shit like that for free. Hell, look at many here on the internet that want products for free and are unwilling to pay or even do minimal donations for things that they already like.

    Like it or not, most people want to be fucking paid for their time and FOSS, as great as it can be, is not the norm for most talent. We can make counter arguments and hate on capitalism, but that is the reality, and until entire cultures change then this is what it is and advertisers are sort of necessary evil in most cases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    My question is whether websites need to be owned by businesses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    No but the end of internet advertising will basically be the end of many internet professions that are already struggling. Like writers and editors. So only hobbyists and the lucky few who have enough fame to get paid via Patreon will be making certain websites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Few online platforms flourish without advertisers. Practically all our content on lemmy comes from sites with advertising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I'm sure people would create content even if they didn't make anything. They did in the past.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    mmhmm, give us your top 10 Peertube reccomendations :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    I just tried to sign up for Peertube because this comment reminded me

    The only site with any videos on it (Fediverse.TV) doesn't allow signups. Neither does the default instance (Peertube.TV).

    Tragically, Web3 cryptoshit MAHA platform "Odyssey" was much more functional when I tried to use it, before realizing what kind of content dominated there.

    EDIT: Finally found one that let me create an account:

    Why create an account?
    As you've probably noticed, creating an account is not necessary to watch videos on Tube Free.
    However, creating an account on Tube Free will allow you to:

    • Comment on videos
    • Subscribe to channels and receive notifications of new videos
    • Have access to your watch history

    ...So even with an account, I can't upload videos?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    you can, there are hundreds of nodes. to be fair there are probably 10's of thousands of videos, but ... they're almost all poor quality or just uninteresting

    If all my time there i've found a couple music channels and a couple of linux people. There's no money in it, so none of the creators put any real time into anything over there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Top 5 recommendations uploaded on YouTube before monetization:

    1. Me at the zoo
    2. Chocolate rain
    3. Charlie bit my finger
    4. Rickroll
    5. Diet coke and mentos
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    The trick with that was that there was no monetization yet. That cat's out of the bag.

    Seriously, there are multiple platforms out there with no monetization, and they're hardly used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Literally everything on the internet is paid for by advertising. And without it every site you rely upon will either become a subscription service or simply disappear because it is expensive to run a website.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    Why is it so expensive to run a website?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    They pay to run ads because it makes them look better for investors who are all stupid people who have inherited JUST enough money to keep them from from ever failing at making money. More ads mean more stock value.

    That's why there are MORE ads than ever even though the number of viewer-per-ad is plummeting.

    Its just one more example of the infinite money printing machines that are about to break the world. All the obviously ruinous bad stuff that is being allowed to happen despite the constant warning sirens is tied to these runaway money printing schemes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    I heard this, what, 6 months ago, from someone else.

    Over half of websites served to you by enshittified search engines are written by machines, to hit results.

    They will rephrase the question as many ways as possible to hit the search engine , then explain why someone would want to know that question, then give you a half assed answer to your question.

    Previously the answer was on the search page. Now, only the AI one is, the results make you all click and search now as not before.

    That's not by accident. They are forcing us to use AI. So called ai, llm bullshit.

    We need our own Open Source Search Engines. We could do that, I could even help on that one.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Open source search engine will not solve this problem. The AI generated websites will simply optimize to be shown on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    It would solve a lot, the search engines are willingly making their results less useful, together, in a trust, a shit-trust. While one way is my example, and they are not blameless in allowing these shit results to be displayed, that is only one way they have started to not serve the user of their product but rather their clients.

    But, what do you think would solve it? Obviously a search engine, and index, that is open source wouldn't solve everything regarding the internet being taken over by ai and bots, but it would help with a lot, not the only thing we need to do by a long shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    search engines are willingly making their results less useful

    Search engines are being flooded by shit content gaming their ranks algorithms. I guess open source engine could be so niche that no one would try to game it and it could help. The moment enough people start using it, it would have the same problem as all the other engines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They are also purposfully not returning content we are asking for. We know it can work, because it did work. They will put forward results from people that pay them, remove material that people pay them to remove, and otherwise are not giving us what we ask for.

    Which is to say nothing of removing answers from the search page itself and only giving it via their ai.

    This is not a good faith enshitification, search engines are not blameless victims, and stopping seo websites from gaming their system is their fucking job, that they did for a long time and now don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I honestly don't know what part of this is enshitification and what part it's actual inability to protect their ranking algorithms. There's so much money in SEO now companies are willing to do crazy things to position their spam. They host entire networks of sites that link to one another, pay people to write spam content and so on. Maybe they could spend more money on detection and keep fighting it, maybe at this point it's impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's a war between search and seo. An ad company offers good enough search for free. I think more competition is the best bet. And it cannot be ad supported and it has to be free. Possibly if Apple is not allowed to be paid by Google (anti trust contract), or if universities/libraries run search engines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The problem isnt the search engine, tge problem is the search index. The index gets big and expensive to maintain quickly. Ive mostly switched to Kagi at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 80 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    Ugh, what pathetic reporting, taking him at his word—that’s not what his own numbers say! It’s not agentic traffic, it’s just all bot traffic! And what’s the number-one cause of bot traffic right now?

    AI scrapers, NOT agentic traffic!

    They’re taking “wow, our scrapers are destroying the internet (see Anubis, “Stop Externalizing Your Costs Directly Into My Face”, etc) and spinning it into “wow, look how powerful agentic garbage is,” while carefully hiding the actual agentic numbers so they can pump this stupid bubble even more!

    Lies, lies, lies, it’s all lies all the way down…

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I mean have you used an agent? They are fucking dumb and make a ton of queries to get anything done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Oh yeah, 100% true, “amount of traffic does not even remotely map to amount of actual work being done especially on such a horrifically inefficient system” was a point I meant to bring up but I sprung a leak in a blood vessel from sheer rage before I could even get there. Thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Just pay for more cloud compute that will fix it...

    Would you like to know more? That's gonna cost ya.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›