top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 175 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Good thing she got out ahead of it before by randomly announcing apropos nothing that she had nothing to do with it, which as we all know, is an obvious confession that something is coming. You love to see it.

These people are the dumbest cunts to exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] 347 points 5 months ago (36 children)
  • [–] 207 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Never been less shocked in my life

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I mean she was a little old for Don's taste when they met. That's a little surprising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I thought this was common knowledge? Is this actually new news?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Honestly thought this was known

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, same here. There was a video circulating before his first term (long before AI and deepfakes) where someone took apart an interview she did talking about "doing business" as a "model" and all the various ways her responses were common to the jargon of prostitution.

    It wasn't just one thing, it was many things, even one part where she put her hand up to her mouth like she knew she should not have said something the way she did because it was an obvious pointer to sex work.

    If I can find it I'll post it, but I haven't seen it since 2015 or thereabouts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    It's gone, or at least as far as I can tell. It would have come out roughly around the same time she sued the Daily Mail for the same kind of story and they retracted as well.

    It was not the only video or story of its kind, by far, and right now they're ALL gone. Not just this video, but almost all first term or prior Melania interviews. There are only a handful of older Melania interviews still out there at all, at least via public search, and absolutely zero that involve the word escort, which this one had in the title. The most recent ones do look entertaining, though.

    The Trump administration has quietly put forth a great deal of effort toward scrubbing the public internet for anything they don't want out there, so I'm not really surprised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Wouldn't that make Melania a victim of human trafficking?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Trafficking involves coercion. We've heard a lot about the minors, but not all Epstein's connections, sexual or otherwise, were coerced: many were legally of age who were simply paid.

    By all accounts, Melania came to the US of her own free will and was an adult when she interacted with Epstein. There is no evidence she was ever coerced, nor that she was pimped. She's never said she was, and no one has ever suggested that about her.

    And to drive the point home, she is most certainly acting out of her own free will now, and to the same end: selling her [name, title, access to power, story] for money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    I am sorry are you suggesting that people of legal age who are trafficked have not been coerced. We have tons of first hand accounts of the manipulation that Epstein and Maxwell used regardless of age. Everything from exposure to sexual acts and nudity to wear down resistance to promises of connections and other benefits.

    Do you think she was in her right mind hanging out as a coked out escort for a human trafficker and pedophile? Also, her access to the Einstein visa is extremely suspect as she in no way qualified for it.

    Who was the one who helped her secure it. Was it Trump who she was supposed to be dating at the time. If so and if it was not a bribery situation, why has she not released her application.

    I think you may be purposely downplaying what happened to her to because of your own held personal beliefs. Remember, according to Maxwell Trump and Epstein never did anything wrong. Why should we put trust in what Melania says when she is a demonstrable liar.

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/20/blog-posting/claim-about-melania-trump-touting-false-credential/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago* (9 children)
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I dated a girl before she Turned Pro. Decades later she filled me in on her short stint, and this one gem:

    • if she's waiting for you, she's a whore
    • if you're waiting somewhere for her, she's an escort or a call-girl.

    One of them has more rules, too.

    But I dunno.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    A high-class whore is still a whore.

    No shade, and do what you want - grab that bag if that's what you want, but there's little difference between a street walker, a call girl, or a porn star. You're still being paid for sex, simple as that. If it's consensual, and nobody is being exploited then whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    if you’re waiting somewhere for her, she’s an escort or a call-girl.

    if she is an escort, than you having to pay should have been a hint. and are you saying that normal girls and women are never late? this "wisdom" seems more like something someone read in a playboy and didn't think about it much...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Read it again.

    yeah, lets try.

    I dated a girl before she Turned Pro. Decades later she filled me in on her short stint

    they talked to former hooker

    and this one gem: [gem]...

    and this one gem... sentence misses predicate, so i have no fucking idea what they are trying to say.

    One of them has more rules, too.

    one of who? what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe there is some cultural gap.

    Note: I am not saying this commenter is correct. I am attempting to parse the words for you to get a better handle on what I think they meant.

    They are explaining how if you are paying for sex and you are waiting for the sex worker to show up (indicating that they hold some power in the transaction) then they are an escort or a call-girl.

    If the sex worker was standing around waiting for a client (indicating less power in the transaction on their side) Then they are a 'whore' or 'hooker.'

    The 'one of them has more rules' comment is saying that the group being called escort or call girl has more rules about what you are allowed to do/have done to you than the group under the banner of hooker or whore.


    Again - not my words, not my belief. I am only playing translator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    well my experience does not extend beyond watching the diary of a callgirl, but i think that

    (indicating that they hold some power in the transaction)

    is romanticizing it little bit. power in any transaction belongs to person paying. the difference is you pick one of them on her street corner and the other one in the hotel lobby, but i don't see that fact as any mysterious revelation. and i don't think that callgirl being constantly late would get lot of repeated business.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 72 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    We might have to rename the Streisand-effect

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 62 points 5 months ago

    This is what her weird, out of the blue announcement a month or so ago was about.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    It's already known that Ivana Trump went out with Ghislaine to help bring girls back to Epstein's place.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 5 months ago

    Finally here it is: the thing she weirdly tried to deny a couple of months ago is surfacing.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Here comes another UFO release! I bet tomorrow.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    I guess she gave that press conference a little too soon because im sure most people forgot about it already. Lol

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Wait wait wait, I thought this was common fuckien knowledge at this point. Have y'all been fucking sleeping up till now?! WTF!?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Dude I can barely remember the scandals that happened just a week ago. The Trump regime is so rapid-fire with this shit you gotta make it second fucking job to stay up to date.

    The crimes he's committed that we've forgotten about would have ended an entire political party in a sane world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Every time Maduro comes up I have a hot minute of "oh shit, I forgot about that."

    We kidnapped a foreign leader from his own country and are holding him without authority and putting him on trial and so much else has happened that it's barely even talked about.

    Like listen, Maduro sucks, not defending his crimes, but what the actual fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    And don't forget about that time just a few months ago when Trump's personal militia literally occupied an American city, killing two innocent civilians in the process, while making hundreds more disappear without a trace. This is so much fucking fun!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    I did think she was, but after that unprompted press conference where she specifically said she was not associated with known paedophile "Jeffrey Epstein and his associates" ^TM^ , i realised I'd been wrong about her

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Zampolli is now a Special Envoy for Global Partnerships and a member of the Kennedy Center Board of Trustees.

    No incentive to protect the lie then. And he seems like a kind, friendly fellow. /s

    Special Envoy for fuckin’ what??

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    someday some streamer in a hazmat suit is going to point to a shadow on the wall in the Mar-a-Lago exclusion zone and say "the ancient chat says that this one was a concubine of the child eaters"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So “Einstein visa” was actually a typo?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago

    if I just get ahead of things and tell in a press conference that I did not rob a bank, nobody will believe I robbed a bank when evidence comes out that I did rob a bank

    Aaahh, the thought patterns of the mentally insane

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    About her? No. About the Epstein connections I do, and not only for their sake, but because these repeated allegations make it harder every time for her to successfully come back against her accusers with defamation lawsuits.

    She likes to conduct lawfare against anyone who dares say a truthful word about the various acts of sociopathy in her past, but when the same things are alleged over and over again by different groups of people in different settings they give her accusers an obvious defense. That I do enjoy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    To the complete lack of surprise of everyone

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Oh boy, can't wait for the consequences this time. I wonder if she will be "SLAMMED" or "DESTROYED" over this, since we all know they don't seem to be interested in jailing these people.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    I mean? Isn't this why Putin keeps showing her with her business on display on their "news" outlet?

    I figured that was always a rather clear message to PEDOnald that they know.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Ooh I like the animated thumb..

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Zampolli, meanwhile, told the Daily Beast: “I think it is a disgrace that she dares to say this about our marvelous first lady.”

    That's about the fastest way to make me think your opinion means shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I already knew that.

    I don't really care, do you?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Melania, Eater of Men? Really?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Now it makes total sense that they want to build a pizza restaurant in the bunker under the ball room

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago* (15 children)

    She still can barely speak english - who on earth would doubt the fact that she's just a dumb hoe sold to trump?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Just dont say she's a prostitute, you will get sued. Or whore, cant say that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Based on Ungaro's allegations, it looks like Melanoma might initially have been trafficked as a minor.

    Regardless, it looks like she got into the US on an Epstein visa.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    not that I doubt that she is dumb, but using her foreign language ability as a measure of intelligence is definitely racist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    using her foreign language ability as a measure of intelligence is definitely racist

    US immigration and eugenicists concluded Italian immigrants were stupid in the 1920s because of English IQ tests.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    It's not racist. She's not just your average immigrant working daily to feed her family after fleeing their country so they don't get killed.

    The first lady of America should be able to speak English.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely not, Melania came to New York in 1996, Meaning she has been living in USA for 30 years, and since she was 26.
    She has also had access to teachers if she wanted them. Also I bet as a model going to USA, she worked in an international environment, where English is frequently spoken.

    It's a disgrace she doesn't speak better English. It's not just because she has bad linguistic skills, it's also because she hasn't cared much to improve her English for 30 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    A former associate of Melania Trump has sensationally claimed the first lady was an “escort” for Jeffrey Epstein and met the president through the notorious sex offender.

    Honestly, we knew this. Even if we didn't know he was connected. She was a sex worker and she lit his candle. What a surprise.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    SPOILER ALERT!!!

    Nothing will happen.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›