Car companies will tell you themselves if you wade through their privacy policies. The information they harvest can include precise location data about everywhere you go, who's in the car with you, what's on the radio and whether you buckle your seatbelt, drive too fast or brake too hard. Some can gather details you might not expect like your weight, age, race and facial expressions. Do you pick your nose? Some cars have cameras on the inside pointed at the driver's seat. And most come with internet connections that can ship off that data as you drive in blissful ignorance.
post
Nope! I have a 20+ y/o car, so mine is not. No touch screen, no spyware, just a car with buttons and knobs that we drive around.
If it's not your car then it's your smart phone.
Hard to escape the surveillance machine (i.e. unregulated marketing and their data collection).
I'm in it too...
Luckily I drive a piece of last-millenium machinery.
May the japanese engineers that designed it with reliability in mind be praised.
I pulled the fuse that runs that stuff in my car. Don't need anything it disabled, so I don’t give a fuck.
Sure if I ever need service it might be a problem, but I’ll cross that bridge when and if I get to it, and maybe we’ll have better data protections by then.
Which car is this easy to privacy-ify?
Sorry to not reply, haven't been around for a bit, I have a 2023 chevy bolt EUV, but the EV version is the same, and what I was planning to get if not for availability. Idk about their ice vehicles, ofc, nor any line of vehicles outside the US or non-electric. This was really the only one that checked all the boxes for me (privacy available, decent range, fully electric, cargo space and can* haul short distances. *owners manual says not to haul with it but you can. Should not be used to haul long distances as extra load just destroys the range, but I need 5-10 miles tops, and it can do that fine)
You can actually pretty easily remove the on-star module of you need the gps to work (only really useful over using a phone for pulling a full 12 amps by default from a level 1 (standard plug) outlet with location-based charging, but nobody I know, including me, wants to risk their wiring or get it inspected to assure I can pull that much amperage, so it literally makes no difference, plus when I have an electrician out, it’ll be to install a different plug to use a level 2 anyway which will pull at max, since my garage has an appliance hookup currently), but if you don't the one fuse kills all of it, and I think maybe the bluetooth microphone as well? I don't connect my phone to my car at all since that defeats the purpose, but I read something about it. I don't think it applies to phone calls, just voice controls. Something to look into if it matters to you.
I'd be curious if anyone documented how to privacy-ify it? Like someone who checked that it disabled all the sensors, like microphones, cameras, seat cushons, GPS, etc.
Honestly, it’s a “budget” vehicle, it doesn’t really have bells and whistles (for example, the infotainment system hardly gets used because it has physical buttons, but it does have the legally mandated backup camera on a different circuit, I haven't seen any cabin cameras), and they are only really highly available because most of the used ones on the market started life as cheap base package rentals, like mine.
I doubt they would bother being nefarious for a vehicle like that, when most people wont bother pulling a fuse even, but I’d also like to see that.
This is one reason I haven't bought an electric car.
So what's the solution? What's the car where we can opt out or easiest to remove the sensors without it breaking?
It's also probably recording the password you typed on your phone.
Don't give the password to police? They'll just ask your car.
If you bought a Nissan, you've given them the right to collect data about your sexual orientation and history. It's in their privacy policy.
So like, what car do you buy new if you want to mod it to not phone home?
No can can transmit data without an antenna. I disconnect mine when I get a new car and just don't install their app on my phone.
Some cars have a "telemetry" fuse, but I've never trusted that. They don't explicitly say which part of the car does the spying and the reporting.
A cellphone doesn't have a visible antenna, yet it transmits. I'm only saying this because I dont know about cars... are you removing the radio receiver antenna, or is there a cell phone antenna hidden in the car somewhere that can also be removed?
My understanding is that the radio antenna module on the roof will have several antennas (AM/FM radio, satellite radio, GPS, mobile data), and you could disconnect the mobile data and GPS from the telemetry module, after which it would appear to the car that it just didn't have service. I haven't done this myself though so I'm not sure
As if I needed more reasons to keep repairing my shitbox from 2013. Japanese, no internet connection or infotainment integration. I could take out a 12 month loan for an engine replacement every year and it still wouldn’t cost as much as a car payment + full coverage insurance.
I’ll be driving my Japanese vehicle into the ground. Analog everything, smartest thing on it is Bluetooth but there’s no app, no smart anything, no cellular antenna. Considered looking into converting it into a PHEV but that would probably be quite expensive, if even remotely possible. Especially without adding third party telemetry.
That's a false equivalency, though, as the former didn't include matching insurance— nevermind that it's generally illegal, IIRC, to drive uninsured. 😅☝🏼
The minimum insurance to cover legal requirements (and not damages to your own car) is pretty cheap tbf
That isn't the technicality in question, though, and while that cost may be "cheap" (and fluctuate by area/provider), that's a qualitative judgement not a quantitative value.
The first set lacked any mention of insurance (despite it being a pre-req for legal use of a motor vehicle on public ways), unlike the comparative second set that followed.
If something is going to be "cheaper than" something plus another thing, and the add-on for emphasis is actually a requirement for the former, it doesn't exactly work as a comparison or even as hyperbole. 🫡🤷🏼♂️🤓
It works because liability coverage should be basically the same for both vehicles, and insignificant compared to non-liability insurance for a new car. The latter is not a legal requirement, but it is much more necessary for a new expensive car because it would be much more difficult to cover the cost of replacing such a car out of pocket if something happened to it. If you can cover the cost of replacing your car yourself, then you can avoid paying the insurance company a premium for their service. Also if the new car is purchased with a loan that insurance is probably a contractual requirement.
For these reasons these types of insurance are better considered separately, and the legally required insurance won't affect the conclusion of the analysis of which car is a better financial decision, so it is reasonable to omit mention of it.
While your logic seems sound on the surface, the simple omission of any insurance mentioned in the first set undermines the rationalization. Whereas, including "and minimum required insurance" to said set would correct the inaccuracy, if only slightly.
Assumptions in formulae should always be clearly notated, if only to prevent their absence from otherwise implying a null/negative value. 🤓
Good effort, though. 🖖🏼
Really cool emojis. Where can you drive a car and NOT have insurance? You cannot drive a car without insurance. It’s not a false equivalency lmao
The legally required minimum liability insurance for my 20 year old Honda is $36 a month.
My wife's 2013 Lexus? Full coverage: $120 a month.
Both of them are paid off, but hers is "prettier" and so she wanted to keep full coverage on it when we paid it off.
When you drive a car owned by the bank, they require you have full coverage on the vehicle. I own my car and am not making payments, so I can have the lowest possible liability my state allows on my car.
If I had a used car I was making payments on, I would be required by law to have full coverage on the vehicle. I did no suggest that I have NO insurance.
Infuriating when people talk as if you are not there so they can make their shit talking points with no recourse.
Mine isn't. I got a 2023 bolt and immediately upon taking possession, pulled the fuse that runs that shit. I could go behind the screen and remove the onstar module entirely, and I probably will to restore the nav and location-based charging at some point, but not a priority. Pulling the fuse didn't disable anything I can’t live without, since my old car didn't even have the stuff that gets disabled.
I don’t use apps on my phone that connect to the car, and haven't even synced my phone for calls. I have an old android I factory reset and created a local account on, which doesn’t have a sim card, just hotspot from my active phone, and I use that for the EV charge location apps, totally isolated from anything else because they, too, syphon data.
I’d personally never buy a vehicle that couldn’t have all that shit disabled. It may still collect it, but if I cant intercept or prevent transmission of it, I wouldn't buy the vehicle.
I’m hoping that by the time I need to replace this one, we have at least started to invest in decent public transit that doesn't take 3-10x as long as driving. It could happen. Else I’ll just never leave home because I won’t buy one.
Repair shops upload stored data automatically when they have to purchase a software license to do work on your car.
Do you have a citation for that? With how shit search has become I’m struggling to find anything about it. All i get are right-to-repair articles and stuff about data access being a problem for repair shops (I assume thats in the same vein)
Wonder how that works when I haven't consented to any data disclosures, even implicitly. I didn't set up any of those things, because I pulled the fuse, and no consent screens ever came up. None of the paperwork signed was for it, either, best I could tell.
I'm unreasonably infuriated by this title format.
My car isn't spying on me. It doesn't have any kind of wireless connectivity whatsoever.
I just don't see a way out of this in the US. The only thing that could convince lawmakers to remove privacy violating sensors in cars is Chinese EVs spying on American drivers. As long as they're prohibited from being sold in the country though that's still too vague a threat for them to do anything about it.
Their answer would be to make the Chinese sell the US software version to a US company, as they did with TIKTOK US.
They’re caught between raising privacy safeguards (hurting US data brokers like Google) and making sure a foreign company doesn’t have access to American users. Their answer was to force the foreign company to sell their US subsidiary. This is the current playbook.
You will lose more rights and the government will see to it that only US companies can exploit you, though even this is becoming increasingly untenable.
Cats are trying to spy on you
laughs in mid 90s vehicles..
Data centers are being built for this, not so you can have chatgpt. Please realize that is huge. We are transitioning into a new era that is obviously going to take adjustment to live with. And probably not all people will be able to deal with that adjustment. And maybe the whole idea isn't the right decision for humanity to make. Or maybe it is, and it will make the world a different place for the better.
...imagine that that's why we have trump as president imagine that he is just part of an operation. He is the actor, maybe unknowly, or the fall guy, for a plan. Kind of like a coup type plan, but the idea is to force the transition over to digital life, because this is sort of a cyber arms race... Peter theil, at least from the little I've heard of him, might be right... There is serious things happening and the transition to digital ideology is truely our natural trajectory coming from what we've built as a nation or species.
I don't believe it's ethical, but when has history been ethical.
I think people get focused on the wrong things. I think people focus on psychological marketed debates, and narratives. Bigger things are happening and we are distracted away from them. People underestimate how you can use psychology to move a human being. You can use psychology to control a whole industry, and nation.
Life is changing. There's very little chance of stopping it. I don't think people understand what that would probably entail.
Looking at it ... Like human life is organic, and we are getting forced to say good bye to that natural connection to the universe. Maybe time goes by so fast now and this is the first time we are really being able see the change of an era while it's happening.
I feel that COVID feeling of "oh fuck life is different now and it's never going to be normal again."
This is the wave we are on and we need to do our best to learn how to ride it together, even with all of our differences. In reality, I don't think there are rules to this game. This is chaos territory for people really playing the real game. Humanity is at stake and our governments aren't helping the true mission of honest humanity.
Are we going to reach a time when regular people truly join the world stage of geo politics? Like wars different than the wars we've known? Almost like instead of "world war 3" something more like world civil war is coming due to the divisions of ideology clashing, and the threat to regular average citizens why of life and existing? Basically all of humans worst traits seem to be being acted on instead of learning to just exist and follow the lessons passed down of existential coexistence. Proper spiritual connection to the heart of the universe.
/...just a flow of what ifs....
all 20 comments