Had me in the first half.

Judges should be required to neuter the prosecution when they are clearly using the expense of the legal system to strongarm someone.

Not...like...literally neuter. I mean if the defense is financially limited and could only afford a single lawyer and a couple paralegals, then the prosecution should be limited to the same resources. Maybe by reviewing billed hours or something. Idk.

Otherwise the prosecution is just a big bully.

rightsholders

How do you shold a right?

legitimate rightsholders

Oxymoron. There is no such thing.

You arrrrr correct.

There are also ways to hurt them more financially than just boycotting. Boycott companies who advertise with them too!

Because he's a malignant narcissist. In his head he's the center of the world and nothing else matters. And being a TV personality himself, ratings are the ultimate expression of that, because if eyes are on him instead of anyone else, then it justifies his own narcissism in a feedback loop. Anything that threatens that is a threat that he's psychologically incapable of accepting, and he gets engaged. How he's got dementia and is untouchable, so the filter is long gone, so he lashes out publicly about it. He cares because he has to, because cognitive substance is unbearable, and the reality of someone being popular who also challenges his delusions is something he literally cannot stand. Trump is a maladaptive excuse of a human being and he can't ever admit to being anything but the best, most important person in the world, and being president of the US is the ultimate concrete expression of that in his head.

I'm not sure if you understood what I meant. I'm not saying I agree with what Trump wrote, or that his opinions are somehow shaping my reality. I am saying that the objective reality of a United States President, one of the most powerful people on the planet, taking the time to write insecure and childish social media posts directed at a television show host is weird.