Isn’t… literally anything but Spotify better? There are dozens of streaming services, many of them great, and websites to export your playlists.
I don’t understand why it’s so difficult to unsubscribe.
Isn’t… literally anything but Spotify better? There are dozens of streaming services, many of them great, and websites to export your playlists.
I don’t understand why it’s so difficult to unsubscribe.
Please leave Spotify
a disappointed review...
Fixed that for you.
I am proud to admit I have never subscribed to shit. You give them an inch then they make you their bitch. They already get the ads even if you pull your pants down. Repect yourself and drop all subscriptions and get a library card nerds
My argument always has been that torrenting is still better and more ethical then subscribing to spotify. Vindicated once again
You can always buy the music directly from the artist? Why steal it from them just like Spotify does?
ITT: People who don’t deserve music. Learn to play it yourself or buy it, there is no other moral option.
I buy music, but pirsting is not stealing
Copying data is not theft. Cut it out.
I buy albums regularly, but what, you think I have money for a gazillion cds? Lmao
Yeah… it’s called a music collection? Why should you have access to other people’s work for free?
Better yet, unsubscribe
FYI, Qobuz pays artists very well (the most of any streaming service last I checked) and they have a ton of audiophile-grade quality stuff. Been using them for a couple years, highly recommend.
And even if you don't want a subscription service you can still buy stuff from them :)
Is there a way to see their library without signing up? Ive ditched spotify already but the problem i have is half the artists i like seem to only be on yt and spotify
Even better than show the library, you can buy without subscription
You can view a large chunk of their library via their download shop e.g.: https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/shop
I do think they have some things that are streaming-only, and those might not show up in the download shop.
I can warn you that they don't have all the artists / songs I used to be able to get on YT / Tidal, but they have enough to keep me happy.
If you can't figure it out any other way, DM me a list of Arists / Titles / Tracks to look for and I'll search from my account for you.
half the artists i like seem to only be on yt and spotify
That's interesting. I don't think I've ever had this problem. Mine seen to be everywhere. What kind of stuff do you like? I'm into lots of indie rock and I always figured if any artists would be missing it'd be my obscure little indie bands
Mostly rock and pop stuff, a little bit of rap. Ill admit i havent looked recently, it was a couple years ago at this point. But Tidal and uhhh idk some other one i cant remember the name of didnt have a bunch of stuff I like, like deathbyromy, bodyimage, demondice, TRiDENT, and some others(probably not an exactly perfect list of what they were missing at the time bc like i said years ago, but ya).
But im pleased now that i got around to checking out a bunch of artists qobuz seems to have everything. And as others have attested to, the quality is good.
I've been using Qobuz for a while and it's fine. I feel like I lost a bunch of niche artists when I moved from YT Music to Tidal and then more when I moved from Tidal to Qobuz. Still, it's got a wide selection and much of it is absolutely audiophile quality.
I wish their Android app had a legitimate offline mode. I have a playlist downloaded that I use when driving, but I often have WiFi in the driveway when I start it. This cause Qobuz to decide to stream the song, and then it continues streaming instead of using the downloaded songs, while I drive around and using way more data than I'd like. I've started turning off mobile data, and only hitting play once I think I'm far enough away from the house, but sometimes I'll drive past somewhere I have the saved WiFi for and Qobuz will switch to streaming, and then just stop playing with no error message in Android Auto once I leave the WiFi and the buffer runs out.
I wish their web app would allow me to access the "For Me" "Daily Qobuz" and "Weekly Qobuz" dynamic playlists. They are a fine way to start my day with a mix of stuff I know I like and new experiences -- but I have to open up my phone to start them, because that section is just compeltely missing from the web version.
I still recommend Qobuz every time I'm asked because they both pay artists more and aren't based in the United States (so they are less likely to kowtow to Trump); I even did the 3-year plan when it was offered. But, my personal experience is worse with them than the other services I've used.
you can set the playlist to only show and play your downloaded tracks
That doesn't seem to work for me. I've dowloaded my driving playlist, and hit the toggle to only show downloaded tracks, but for some reason the Android app still wants to stream sometimes AND when it does it evidently deletes the downloaded version. I haven't change the playlist in months, and I keep having to hit the download button, because one or more tracks is somehow no longer downloaded.
I have checked both my Qobuz and system-level storage allocation and availability. I'm no where near running out of either.
when my phone has a connection again, it starts playing whatever my PC was playing
Yeah, I do wish I could disconnect those. I understand why someone would want a playlist to "follow" them across devices, but I don't, usually. Right now, it's the only way I can get the "DailyQ" to play on my laptop or desktop. But, if I could I'd keep the phone just on the few playlists that I have downloaded on it, and do streaming / exploration / auto-play / weekly shows on my laptop and desktop.
I'd have to actually use Spotify for that. No thanks.
I’m all up for sharing alternatives that are good/better towards actual artists.
Literally everyone pays artists more than Spotify. Even fucking Peleton, apparently.
Tidal seems to be the best option overall. Deezer pays artists less initially than the other services (but still more than Spotify), but the royalties increase for tracks with at least 1,000 streams from 500 unique subscribers each month. Popular artists with more play make more royalties. You benefit Deezer, they benefit you, which makes sense to me.
Qobuz seems to pay highly to artists, but their library is a bit more limited compared to Tidal and Deezer, and their radio functionality is utterly shit.
Apple is the only one I don't have much info on. I've used all four at various points, but Apple Music the least because I don't like my options being limited to playing it on my Apple TV, and Apple devices are limited to 24-bit/48khz, and Apple has weird EQ that pushes vocals way forward in my experience. I don't like the music fucked with, just play it without DSP and let my equipment to the work, okay?
Currently subscribed to Qobuz and Deezer, and seriously, fuck Spotify.
I've had the opposite experience with Tidal vs Qobuz. Tidal had almost none of what I listen to, but Qobuz did the best job of catching my library when I migrated.
I think it depends entirely on what your music interests are. But I've been pretty happy with Qobuz.
I was referring mostly to balancing out artist royalties with service quality/content, but preference is all subjective and their libraries are all huge. I mean, I’ve got several thousand albums, over 54k tracks in my local library and it would barely scratch a tiny percent of these services.
I actually like Qobuz as well, and it’s great for jazz and classical in particular. I have it integrated with Lyrion, but my wife prefers other services, and Deezer is the currently preferred option. We tend to rotate music services periodically and generally have two at any time. We don’t do much with video services, neither of us watches stuff frequently, but we game and listen to music often.
———
Edit - I really do find Qobuz’s radio feature to be shit, but with Lyrion I have integrated “Don’t stop the music” plugin that pulls related artists via LastFM’s API and keeps an indefinite music queue going.
In general I prefer owning my music locally, and mostly use the streaming services for discovery.
Spotify? Being disrespectful towards artist??
So basically, you can self host something similar to Spotify fairly easily or just keep your music on your phone (if you aren't a die hard quality guy and don't have millions of songs).
There's spot-dl to mass download your playlists from YouTube. Granted, YouTube doesn't have everything. Then you can support your favorite artists directly by buying merch from their website, their albums on Bandcamp, etc.
The thing is you can stop using the app but it will still keep generating playlists for you. By now, it knows you pretty well. So you can just go back periodically to download more songs and abuse of the algo without actually giving them money and ad revenue. From what I understand, it's the discovery feature that is missing from most open source apps.
Hmm, I grew up with the pirate stuff back in the day but am kind of at the age where I don't mind paying a little more for things I appreciate. I'm into self-hosting and all, but would love for there to be an ethical and legal alternative to recommend 😅. I think I would miss the jam-feature the most on such a route, as sharing the playlist/queue wherever you are from a huge catalog with friends is difficult to maintain. It seems that convenience is always the way they keep you locked in ☹️
Theres a toooon of sites to just buy digital tracks from. Hdtracks I recall, I have no idea how good they are.
For me, if I'm paying , im getting physical media. Or at the very minimum DRM free media
Bandcamp amazingly hasn't shit the bed yet. Its not for super popular artists but there is a lot on there. I love their setup: you buy either physical media or digital, you can dowoad the album as many times as you want in any quality, and also stream it unlimited after you buy. No monthly bullshit. (I dont pay subscriptions that aren't utilities).
I give em 5 more years until they go under.
Been selfhosting my music for years (was the initial push into the hobby). Bandcamp is your friend. I also don't mind paying more for what i like nowadays. Still, I pirate stuff im not sure i like yet, like a demo of sorts. I listen to too much experimental stuff recommended by friends to know what ill love before simmering on it. Then i either go back and buy it, or just make sure to support them in more direct ways like buying more merchandise than I normally would. Pick a band that I've been vibing on that month and dumptruck cash on them.
Not a perfect solution, but it works for me, and I think I've given more money to artists overall than my table scrap stream pennies would have.
Would prefer to support Google as little as possible. Why use YouTube?
Because you can't really grab music as easily anywhere else. You aren't using YouTube really, just downloading the song once through them.
There are torrents but the scene isn't the best from what I understand, most songs are missing the moment it isn't a classic. It might have changed since last I checked.
So just because something is easy, I should be able to steal it?
Well, if it's between that or paying Spotify to steal it for you. Best is just to buy all your music directly off the bands website.
I did outline you should buy from bands in my first comment. It's okay imo to pirate a lot even if you support just a few bands. It's better than what Spotify is offering.
I have yet to find an artist that is available on Spotify that doesn’t also sell their music by the album for a fair price.
Not everyone can afford that.
Hence why I said "if it's between [piracy for most and directly supporting a few] or letting Spotify steal for you."
You aren't defending artists right now, you are defending a parasitic corporate juggernaut that is feeding on the artists.
Why should you have music if you can’t afford it? Do you need it to live? I’m a fucking musician, I am absolutely defending artists. What instrument do you play?
My argument is that people should pay artists for their music. Folks that use Spotify to any degree are the ones supporting the corporate juggernauts. Go directly to the source. Please don’t misrepresent my argument in the future.
Edit: trying to cover all my bases. In pop music, the “artist” is the collaboration of all the corporate entities responsible for producing their talent. I don’t listen to that shit either. Just try to know the artist you’re listening to.
Get off your high horse, I play guitar and used to play a few other things. Anyone can call himself a musician, unless you're making a living off of it, it means nothing in the current context.
I'm trying to get people off Spotify, even if it means they need to pirate most of their library and only support some artists.
Would you rather they use Spotify or pirate+buy merch. If someone is used to have a 500 song playlist and can only afford to either have a spotify subscription or buy one album a month, they won't switch to buying their music outright. They might switch to pirating+buying an album a month.
It’s not a high horse. I’m a human that made a choice to support artists the best way possible. When you pirate music or stream it, you’re diluting the share of profits that go to the artist. It’s really that simple. There’s no reason to pirate music or stream it if physical copies are always available. Hell, buying the album on BandCamp to receive a digital copy is also available.
Buying albums > Pirating most and buying some albums > streaming
There’s no reason to pirate music or stream it if physical copies are always available.
It's about pirating or streaming IF you can't afford to buy. Do you see the if there? I don't know how I can be clearer, you aren't even reading what I'm saying.
If you can’t afford music you don’t deserve music. It’s not a need; it is a want. You can live without wants until you’ve saved up enough money for them if you’re an adult.
I don't generally leave reviews for products I don't use but I don't think a few bad reviews will have the same effect as leaving the platform would.
Well, the review/opinion is there for others to see, while just leaving would not make any waves at all. Granted, it may as well be both, but I'm not sure where to go, yet. For instance, as Deezer's Android app are just 0.1 out of 5 behind it might just tip someone in a better(?) direction. Honestly I thought most of the competitor apps would have been better by now, as they were pretty slick back in the Zune days already from what I remember.
"Wildly disrespectful" is using Spotify in the first place. Stop supporting big tech just because "it's convenient".
Or uninstall and stop paying these shitheads to make music worse?
What the fuck is wrong with everyone? Vote with your fucking wallets instead of whining about shit all the time.
It's years since I last subscribed to Spotify, their app is an annoyance that's try to push shit like podcast and advertising that i don't like.
Yeah, so… if them supporting ICE wasn’t enough to make people stop supporting that rash, AI isn’t going to do it either.
I left Spotify two years ago and haven't looked back. I've been happy enough with Tidal but eventually I'm going to start self-hosting.
Spotify has always been the music streaming service for people who love music but hold disdain for artists.
I left Spotify when they paid Rogan a shitload of money to peddle his crap while making efforts to reduce the share of streaming revenue that independent artists received. Guess we all have our tipping points but I’m surprised it has taken some this long while claiming to care about artists.
top 100 comments