all 70 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 205 points 6 months ago (20 children)

Well your first mistake was using Chrome in 2026

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    I hate that I still have to use Chrome because it can do some streaming stuff better than Firefox (and even Chromium for some reason). I only use it to connect to one KVM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    Do the streaming issues resolve themselves ✨magically✨ when faking the user agent to be Chrome for those streaming sites, e.g. using Firefox and a user agent add-on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Many do, yes. Any time I get an error message like "You're not using a supported browser" that message vanishes after adjusting the user agent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Well yes, the warning messages will disappear as those are often shown or not shown based on user agent.

    But will the actual streaming issues go away is the big question.

    Teams on the web for example, worked fine in Firefox even though it warned the user it didn't work in anything but Chrome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    My issues were with h265/HEVC support, proprietary stuff like media codecs can sometimes be a pain. I no longer have that need so I'm a happy fox.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure Firefox added support for HEVC a while back, but it relies on the system to provide the decoder (Which you'll usually have to pay extra for)

    Firefox also supports MKV files now, which is nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Firefox also supports MKV files now, which is nice.

    Since when‽ It feels like support for that format took centuries!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    In 145.

    Funny thing is, the WebM format is actually a constrained profile of MKV, and Firefox strictly enforced those compatibility checks. Chrome never did though, so it could always support MKV files but only if you lied and claimed they were WebM.

    Edit: Lemmy eats the highlight in the link, look for "Matroska" under "Web Platform"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    For when I need Chrome, I use Vivaldi. Its probably over bloated for what I need, but it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • When I need to use Chrome, I just use the Chrome Mask extension in Firefox to change my user agent. I haven’t had a site that actually failed to work on the Gecko engine instead of Chromium. It’s just lazy devs checking your user agent to see if you’re using Chromium, and then throwing a fit if you’re not.

    Chrome Mask even has a built in site reporter, because broken sites don’t actually conform to modern web interoperability requirements. If it fails to work on Gecko, there’s a good chance that it will also fail to work on other platforms (like Apple’s WebKit) as well. And the reports go to the team that develops Firefox, so they can figure out why the site is refusing to work on Gecko.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Vivaldi is a great Chromium browser. I'm more of a Firefox/Librewolf on my personal machines, but my work's software has a few features that only work with Chromium extensions so I had to use it. Was my preferred alternative to all others, while bloated it was highly controllable and didn't focus on unnecessary features like Brave or others. My work recently banned any browser that isn't Chrome/Edge/Firefox though, so I guess I'm back to Firefox and will ignore the features I can't use

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Software updates have gotten so fucked up in general these days.

    It's so rare that changelogs are published to actually educate the end user about what an update will do. Most of the time it's just "Bug fixes and feature updates" with no further detail. What bugs? What features? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Then you update (or, more likely, you left auto-update on) because they guilt you into thinking that you'll immediately fall victim to a zero-day vulnerability if you don't. And suddenly everything just gets slightly worse and worse.

    It should be more accepted to follow the mentality of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" with software, precluding the need to install new updates unless something stops working or there is a vulnerability to patch. On my phone at least, I have auto updates turned off and will generally let audience consensus determine if it's something I want. But it's still a coin toss if I decide to take an update, because no one bothers to tell you what they really do anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    It's so rare that changelogs are published to actually educate the end user about what an update will do.

    This reminds me - One of the games I play did an update called "Nothing update" and it just simply said "Nothing was updated, no need to investigate".

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 61 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Your first mistake was voluntarily using any Google software, especially chrome.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    I googled a definition of a word today. it took me two minutes to get chrome to not use the "AI mode" search when searching via the address bar

    tomorrow I'm switching to Firefox at work. after I spend an hour trying to figure out how to remove the copilot overlay from Excel, anyways

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    When it comes to disabling AI in Google searches, you have two choices:

    • Lawful Option: Add -ai to the end of your search, ie, "define asinine -ai"
    • Chaotic Option Add profanity to your search, ie, "what the fuck does asinine mean"
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    this wasn't the AI preview/response thing at the top of a regular Google search result. they brought me into a new "AI mode" chatbot window completely separate from google search

    I'm still not sure how I got it to fuck off. it kept doing it for simple searches, but would do a regular search if the search keys had enough words

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    OperaGX has been nice to me so far

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago

    Uninstall and use another browser. Easy peasy.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    A while back, I was actually okay with MS being semi forcible about Windows Update.

    Most people overestimate their antivirus, and don’t realize that frequent updates are generally the most important way of keeping their system safe. And, to avoid turning computers into zombies for botnets, to keep the whole internet safe. Windows is the world’s most popular OS - it’s good for the world to keep systems secure.

    And then MS had the gall to betray that responsibility of only shipping critical security patches by forceful methods. They started forcing people to Windows 11, pushing Edge back in as their browser, pushing popups and Start menu changes, and so on. For a thousand reasons, Windows Update has more notoriety in common with malware than the malware it’s meant to protect you from.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I have to admit, I started laughing when it tried to update me to Win 11, I finally threw up my hands and said "Fuck it, why not!" said yes, and it did not work. 😄 It still kept asking though. Hilarious.

    I installed Bazzite this year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I'm 1.5 years into Bazzite now, and to be clear I end up using degrees of not-my-devices for a lot of my time on coprutor these days (so, not pushing this distro that hard over that time, in other words).

    But it's been great, also run it on a small number of super cheap second hand laptops for various things and have had really good experiences.

    There's a few caveats but overall Bazzite is accessible and robust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago*

    I remember chrome, its the new Internet Explorer i believe.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Google doesn't need to scrape the web they just need chrome to send them the das you are already scrapping for them. Stop using Chrome.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    It installed it two years ago but nobody noticed because all the privacy nerds use different browsers

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Omg but it's ok because we called it 🌼⭐ federated learning ✨💮 so we only steal the data that is profitable to us while legally no PII leaves your device 🚀 weeeee!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I wonder when Brave's local blockchain update will drop

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I found out this doesn't apply to celeron laptop from 2016 with 4 GB ram so all good.

    Local AI js API checks pc specs before downloading - cos it wouldn't work anyway 😁

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Leopards ate my face moment. Stop using that trash.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Leopards are those entities that openly boast about eating your face. It's not the case with Google. Your average non-IT-savy person knows almost nothing about their shenanigans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This is not a "leopards ate my face" situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    It is, on my opinion. Lemmers should know Google is not a good faith actor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    For some people, sure - actively choosing chrome despite knowing the kind of company Google has become is silly

    But then I think about the people who have chrome pre-installed on their phones, with no ability to remove it. Despite using a different browser, they still got burned by this.

    I do believe lemmings have a higher tech literacy than the average internet user, but I also believe tech literacy shouldn't be a requirement to hide from ai.

    The people who boast about using chrome and insist other browsers are trash absolutely had their faces eaten... But the people who did their best to avoid chrome did not

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    For some people, sure - actively choosing chrome despite knowing the kind of company Google has become is silly

    Those were the people I was referring to. I was referring to the people who do know better.

    But it's true what you're saying as well, about devices where you have no choice. Not very easy to do anything about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Don't give money to the death star and yes, your data is money

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Just the other day I uninstalled Chrome & gave "Enshittification" as the reason when prompted. Not that I'd been using it since turning to Firefox a few years ago and Waterfox more recently.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It's all a joke at this point lol.

    "So what new evil schemes are big tech up to? Ah, installing LLMs on people's devices? Wonderful!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    people used chrome?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Stop using Chrome

    Without asking

    When has Google ever asked anybody before updating Chrome?

    or notifying*.

    *Except for the

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I only used Chrome on my old phone, and since I have switched away from it with the new phone.

    No sensible adblocker is the point that killed Chrome for me.

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Brave is better than Chrome. Definitely recommend.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    It’s always funny seeing the recent Reddit migrants here. Brave did a massive astroturfing ad campaign on Reddit for a while, and it was hugely successful. After things reached a critical mass, the echo chamber took over and Reddit users naturally began pushing Brave’s marketing fluff to the top. Brave is wildly popular over on Reddit as a result.

    But they never targeted Lemmy, and Lemmings were pretty quick to jump on the “Brave is run by a very problematic person, and has a problematic past” side of things. Lemmy also has a very vocal FOSS enthusiast crowd, because the idea of FOSS meshes very well with why people would land on Lemmy. So Lemmings tend to prefer Firefox forks instead.

    But you can always tell when someone has recently migrated here from Reddit. Because they’ll post a comment praising Brave, expecting to get upvoted like they would on Reddit. And instead, they get buried in downvotes and “my specific fork of Firefox is better” comments.

    And sure enough, OP’s account is less than a day old, so they’re most likely a recent Reddit migrant.

    OP, to address your point, Brave is still a Chromium browser, and has all of the trappings that entails. It is also run by a dude with a problematic past, and the company as a whole has a problematic past too. You should consider switching to a Firefox fork instead, with uBlock Origins or AdNauseum (which is a uBO fork) as ad blockers. I personally suggest the WaterFox fork, though you’ll likely want to disable some of the more strict privacy protections (like wiping all of your data every time you close the app) because it can make daily use a bit of a chore otherwise. There is always a matter of give-and-take between convenience and privacy, and WaterFox tends to skew more towards privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I think you're mixing up Waterfox with Librewolf. Librewolf by default deletes all your data after closing it, Waterfox doesn't.

    It's actually for this reason that I use both for different purposes. I sign into accounts with Waterfox (using account containers and browser profiles so each account's data is self-contained and not shared between each other) and use a sandboxed installation of Librewolf with a few extensions like NoScript installed and letterboxing enabled for anything I don't sign into (i.e. news articles, web searches, etc.) so that the 50-odd domains running scripts on my local news station's website get way less of a fingerprint off me to use to target ads at me or sell my data to data brokers or the gestapo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Hah, you’re 100% correct. I use WaterFox as my daily driver, and remembered all of the frustrations with persistent data deletion from initially trying Librewolf. I swear WaterFox came with those features by default, but I probably transposed the frustration from when I initially tried out Librewolf instead.

  • source
  • parent