Support only through a Discord server
post
"Ads, In-App Purchases"
That game is gonna be full-on enshitification.
I'll see that and raise you a "app is free, but all functionality is paid, which you only find out after you have used the app for its intended purpose and now want the results of the work that you did, specifically when attempting to rescue files from your phone, for instance."
I'll also toss in "all functionality is paid on a subscription model that automatically renews unless you manually disable it and you have to buy at least in one year increments"
I really like the 'free trial' that requires your CC information and will begin billing you 'soon' unless you remember to cancel (and probably burn the card too).
Goddamn! Had this one with "smartdraw.com" lately. I had to draw up a map of our property for a buidling permit, so I looked for an appropriate tool. Spend 3 hours drawing a layout. but turned out I can't export the drawing unless I buy a year subscription of 8 dollars per month. Fuck them and fuck subscriptions! I downloaded LibreCAD and learned the basics of that.
That's not the case at all. For ads, perhaps, but in application purchases? Many games (especially free to play games, of which there are many excellent ones) have purchases you can make in the game.
Helldivers 2 is an excellent game, and that has DLC packs and individual items you can purchase in game. So does World of Tanks (which is also free to play).
Even some perfectly normal applications have that tag, because there's a shareware version (maybe with a launch nag "Ad") and the full paid version (which may only cost a few quid), that you can upgrade to from within the free version. It still counts, even if it's just a one time thing.
There are many scummy practices some game/application makers employ using ads or in-app purchases, but many don't, and both types have that sort of label applied.
Honestly, I see that label applied to basically everything these days, so I just ignore it and judge the application based on the nuance of how their monetisation is presented.
-
It's not already in my distro's package manager
-
A github project with 1000 open issues and no commits for 3 years.
Ubuntus package repo is so out of date though. It's such a pain in the ass.
My distro has one of the highest amount of software packaged, yet i regularly find software i like that isn't. There will always be software that isn't packaged yet useful, i reckon.
Venture capital funding. The plan is always to do a rug pull. Though if it properly freely licensed and the code is reasonable enough to be forked, it's less worrying but still risky. It's better to work with honest people.
This is why I avoid Bluesky
https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-19-2026-series-b
I didn't know this about bluesky D:, but it makes sense. Thanks for the heads up. The atproto ecosystem seems to have cool features for user empowerment and it seems to work well on the few occasions I've visited atproto sites. I hope they can find an ethical way to persevere, but I can't imagine that being easy.
- New post about a promising selfhosted app
- looks inside
- em dashes, emojis, release in last 24h with 35 commits since.
I fucking swear, if only vibe coders would ACTUALLY write up their own posts about THEIR OWN SOFTWARE, many would not act harsh towards them as much as it happens.
Something I ran into just now was AI generated Imagery in Docs or as an Icon.
I am not even that Anti AI as many on here I feel like. But this is a sure fire way to show how much you don't give a shit about your project. Just use emojis or some shit which is ironically even less work but somehow makes it seem more deliberate.
Had a conversation with someone recently about exactly this. Usage of AI generated assets gives me exactly the same feelings as a local business using a gmail or personal ISP email account on their advertising.
It doesn't automatically mean it's bad, but it's an indication that whoever is running things just can't be bothered to put in effort.
A rule of thumb I use is how desperate the software is to tell you the weather even when you never asked for it or even set it up to report it.
The build is failing on main. Or they don't have a build process at all.
Signing-in before being able to use a FREE software.
-glares at Canva after buying Affinity -
That’s why they bought it
Yeah, but it's still irritating. The only function they added to the software that i use is Image Trace. Otherwise i still use the old Affinity Designer that i bought years ago.
If the project maintainer has a policy of "no politics allowed."
Rather than a policy more along the lines of "be respectful"
"This project has been archived on [10+ years ago]. It is now Read Only."
or
Last commit 5+ years ago
Evidence of vibe-coding. Em dashes and emojis sprinkled throughout the documentation? Code with inline comments pointlessly describing some change, as if you want to know what that block of code used to do more than what it actually does?
It's vibe-coded garbage by someone who doesn't know how to code. Stay far away.
inline comments pointlessly describing some change, as if you want to know what that block of code used to do more than what it actually does?
Oh, shit, am AI.
Same, but only after my boss decides to change the functionality for the third time in half a year.
Exactly. I worked on a interface where the elements where shift under conflicting business interests. The comments where a log of dates, person, and what they asked for as we worked on our side to build a case against the insanity.
The comments listed not only what it clearly did but also what it had previously done. Then inevitably something comes in hours before a launch window and that part does not get its comment updated.
I have a solution to that:
🌈✨ Stop using AI to code. ✨🌈
That ship has sailed. The question is how to use AI to code, for every project there's a sweet spot and it rarely is 0% or 100%.
You really don't need to. Nobody is forcing you.
And if they are, seriously considering finding another place of work.
Good luck finding a tech company that isn't forcing devs to use AI.
Uh, I'm working at one.
That was quick.
Are they hiring?
And? I didn't say it was impossible. I said "good luck"
What do you mean "and?"?
I didn't say you said it was impossible lol. You said good luck, implying it's hard, I said I found one immediately because I'm working at one. And I know several other companies and workplaces, too.
It's not hard. Take the L.
The tech job market is awful right now and you know it. And you also know most tech companies ARE followers forcing their devs to use AI because that's the industry trend and that's what tech companies do.
Your original comment was totally disingenuous and you're mad that you got a disingenuous response? Lol. If it were that easy I'd be gone already but it isn't.
I know the tech job market is tough, but it's not universally like that. My comment was not disingenuous, in my opinion. But we may have different perspectives and that's fine. It's just not hard for me to find a workplace where they aren't forcing AI down my throat.
I don't know that "most tech companies" are forcing their devs to use AI, no. Maybe the big ones? I don't know of any in my local area who would be so stupid. All I hear right now with the latest talk around me is how do we use AI responsibly. And how do we utilize it for the right problems and the right reasons.
It might be like this in America where it's all about growth growth growth and where everyone is sorta struggling right now, but in my part of the world we're chilling a bit just yet. I know many of my peers who are hard into AI, but all I hear is that it's mediocre at best at solving the hard problems.
So I'm sitting tight. I don't need AI for my work at all, as a web dev. I know what I'm doing and I enjoy my craft and my deliveries have high quality and low code mass. I'm not interested in letting a robot do my work for me and I be the code reviewer for the rest of my career (the boring part). Hell to the naw. I want to do the fun stuff, be creative and solve problems. That's why I became a programmer in the first place.
An AI is not as up-to-date on the current web standards as I am anyway. Most of the code it's spitting out is legacy garbage because that's what it's been trained on. The web platform moves too fast.
I very much enjoy using AI for all the biloilerplate, test cases, suggestions, etc. It really makes me more productive, hard metrics behind it. Nobody is forcing me to, they just provide the license and let us use our judgment.
I honestly can't think of a project where 0% AI would be better. For 100% maybe a very trivial PoC, but even that would require at least a code revision.
So, as with many things, use in moderation is fine.
It's almost certainly also making your code worse.
It's not impossible to use AI effectively (although I would argue it's impossible to use large "frontier" models ethically, as the companies making them are burning the planet down to power the process), but you have to be extremely vigilant and thoughtful about what you're using it for, and you have to review every single line of code it produces, or you're going to miss bugs and you're going to lose skills.
A good way to test yourself is to see if you can still scaffold out an application by hand. Doesn't matter what... A to-do list, some buttons, whatever. Just test yourself to see if you can still do it.
If you can't, then you've lost the skills necessary to be certain that what you're producing with AI is actually good.
And if the idea of testing yourself like this makes you uncomfortable? Then AI isn't a tool you use, it's an addiction.
I mean, I do leet code semi-regularly, so I'm not too worried about getting rusty. Writing tests is boring as hell, the AI does a decent enough job for at least 90% of them.
Leet code is good for making sure you still have a good grasp of programming conceptually, but I don't think it's good for testing your own practical skills.
Seriously, just take an hour or two to scaffold out something new. Doesn't have to be complicated, just something to confirm for yourself that you can still do it. The only rule is to do it without AI.
When I did it myself, it was after months of my work requiring me to use AI, and there was a moment at the start where I was tempted to just fire up Copilot and tell it to do the work, which - of course - would have defeated the purpose. It was that moment where I realized I was addicted, and needed to go cold turkey.
Now I do the bare minimum with AI I'm required to at work, and focus on crafting my code carefully, by hand as much as possible. And it shows. My code quality has improved.
What do you mean by scaffolding something new? If it's writing all the boilerplate for the framework and dependencies, that's exactly what I don't care about. I use AI now and copy paste in the past.
No, I don't mean writing all the boilerplate. It's simpler than that.
Just to take a random example, let's say the throwaway project you decide to do is build a custom button component in Angular. The steps would be something like this:
ng new buttons- (Answer prompts)
cd buttonsng serve- (Create a custom button component in the new project)
I chose Angular because these days the CLI for it does almost everything for you. It's absurdly easy, and is the sort of thing it may actually be slower to ask an AI to do, because the AI will absolutely try to create a bunch of things in the project itself rather than through the CLI. And it will use Angular patterns from 2024 rather than anything current (such as Signals), because of its training data.
Not only is doing something like this (in whatever language you prefer) good practice for keeping your practical skills, it's a good reminder that AI is only one tool in the toolbox. If it becomes your only tool, well... The old saying about how if all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail applies.
Back when I had to do frontend the AI did use create-react-app. No idea about angular. If it's on stack overflow, the AI knows about it (even if it doesn't always use it).
Even if you ask to create a one shot PoC, sometimes it will use Maven, sometimes Gradle. If you want something specific you include it in the prompt or preferences.
I'd be curious to see what your hard metrics are based on.
https://mikelovesrobots.substack.com/p/wheres-the-shovelware-why-ai-coding
Points per sprint, features shipped, test coverage. Defects remain unchanged.
Code quality? Maintainability down the line? Numbers for those aspects yet?
It's been more than 3 years since we started, and the metrics are stable, slight improvement even but that could be more experience or better models or anything. No apocalypse.
Happy that it's working out for at least a small margin of people. 👍
There's always the many ethical aspects as well, of course.
The ethics are debatable, but there's not turning back, there's plenty of open source models even that do a very decent job, so we will need to learn to deal with the reality. We never hired juniors anyway, but companies that did apparently have stopped, that can't be good.
In my opinion, the ethics are clear problems. There are way too many ethical issues for me to even consider using AI right now. I would never have a clear conscience using AI. Using AI as a service responsibly is impossible right now IMO.
I don't see it that bad. Specially open source models. Agree to disagree I guess.
Open source models aren't really used in AI as a service though, are they?
Depends what you consider as a service. Anthropic and OpenAI will only offer their own stuff, but if you go for AWS Bedrock you have plenty of open source ones. Probably similar for Vertex on GCP. God only knows what Microsoft is doing over there.
Yeah, that... I feel really bad for anyone who trusted and implemented it. The sheer level of exposure with that was mind-blowing. I mean, an endpoint you could hit and just... Get all the API keys?
For anyone who doesn't know, this write-up is a good one: https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/08/huntarr-api-security-risk/
Long story short, a vibe-coded security nightmare for anyone foolish enough to trust it.
Emoji ridden repos just scream scam to me, too. I feel like people who genuinely want to make an app and actually keep it maintained wouldn't resort to AI slop code or even a description.
top 87 comments